Jump to content

Let's Marvel At How Far We Have Evolved as a Civilization -- We Can Now Watch a Genocide on TV From the Comfort of Our Homes


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, RichJ said:

Man. You're deteriorating. You're daughter thinks you would drive with no vision and stoned at the same time? 

Sure. Why not?

Are you aware of how many F1, World Rally Driving and World Motorcycle Championships Finns have won?

When you count how small the population of Finland is, you can only conclude Finns and people of Finnish heritage are by FAR AND AWAY the best drivers in the world.

Straight or high.

  • Laugh 1

"The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date." ~ Gen. Mark (Killer) Kimmitt

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/911_newpearlharbor.pdf

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shiva2999 said:

Sure. Why not?

Are you aware of how many F1, World Rally Driving and World Motorcycle Championships Finns have won?

When you count how small the population of Finland is, you can only conclude Finns and people of Finnish heritage are by FAR AND AWAY the best drivers in the world.

Straight or high.

High and blind. Nice combo. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, SpikedLemonade said:

Me too especially when my automobile energy costs are so low compared to you Petro Bitches.

You have a beta car. It's very feminine. Your wife probably  drives the truck or suv.

  • Laugh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RichJ said:

Is see it as a sign of strength. 

Lots of people (not just Germans) thought Hitler throwing the Jews into concentration camps was a sign of strength.

  • Like 1

"The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date." ~ Gen. Mark (Killer) Kimmitt

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/911_newpearlharbor.pdf

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, shiva2999 said:

Lots of people (not just Germans) thought Hitler throwing the Jews into concentration camps was a sign of strength.

The difference is one is defending  itself and the other thought it could conquer the world.

 

  Israel in Gaza is a statement  saying " Never again"  and the world is seeing their message. F with them, you get sent to stone age. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RichJ said:

The difference is one is defending  itself and the other thought it could conquer the world.

 

 

Germany thought it was defending itself too.

  • Like 1

"The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date." ~ Gen. Mark (Killer) Kimmitt

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/911_newpearlharbor.pdf

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, shiva2999 said:

Germany thought it was defending itself too.

So the Jews attacked fellow Germans and cut their kids heads off? See this is exactly why you need reliable sources. You don't even know history. You once again have demonstrated you are not an expert. You are getting the incorrect information.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, RichJ said:

No, they wanted racial cleansing and world conquest 

Did I say they didn't?

Read it again.

"The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date." ~ Gen. Mark (Killer) Kimmitt

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/911_newpearlharbor.pdf

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RichJ said:

The difference is one is defending  itself and the other thought it could conquer the world.

 

  Israel in Gaza is a statement  saying " Never again"  and the world is seeing their message. F with them, you get sent to stone age. 

Well, depends on who you ask.  If you read Der Angriff (The Attack), Die Volkischer Beobachter (the People's Observer), or Deutsche Wochenschau, the equivalent of Fox News (it was a news reel you saw before the movies), or listened to the radio, you would be told that the pogroms were in retaliation against the Jews.  Kristallnacht? A German diplomat (who conveniently disliked the Nazis) gets killed by a Jewish Bolshevik? So the SS helped foment the rage of the German people.  Sudetenland? The Czechs are persecuting the German minority there.  We must protect them.  Poland? they attacked the Fatherland.  See, Polish people attacked our settlements.  Attack.  France? They declared war on us after we defended ourselves against Poland, we must invade.  Belgium and Holland? They didn't let us in.  The Soviet Union?  Its the heartland of Jewish Bolshevism and see the Red Army was plotting to attack us first.  We had no choice but to attack them.  BTW, neocons still pimp this interpretation of the start of Barbarossa and so do those such as Viktor Suvorov.  Man, the neocons were so effective at this on that they had me parroting this interpretation of events at the time.  Then, well I read the source material.  Yeah, the Red Army was in no position to defend itself, let alone launch any sort of offensive war in 1941.  For much more on that read David Glantz's Stumbling Colossus.  

Anyways, everything the Nazis did to the Jews in Germany from the Nuremberg Laws to Kristallnacht was portrayed as countering the Jewish threat.  Every invasion the Germans did? That's right it was to defend the Fatherland.  The Soviet Union and every war crime they committed there? To defend the reich against Jewish Bolshevism.  People gobbled it up.  The experts and government and official media sold it that way.  The dissidents? They were silenced (brutally), and the White Rose Society? They were fucking beheaded.  

So yeah, the nazis were full of shit.  So are Netenyahu regime apologists and boy oh boy is the lingo in defense of their policies disturbingly similar.

  • Laugh 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, shiva2999 said:

Did I say they didn't?

Read it again.

Israel's. Say  you didn't. Read it again.   You did say they were defending themselves which they really werent. If they were it isn't for the same reason as Israels. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Herodotus said:

Well, depends on who you ask.  If you read Der Angriff (The Attack), Die Volkischer Beobachter (the People's Observer), or Deutsche Wochenschau, the equivalent of Fox News (it was a news reel you saw before the movies), or listened to the radio, you would be told that the pogroms were in retaliation against the Jews.  Kristallnacht? A German diplomat (who conveniently disliked the Nazis) gets killed by a Jewish Bolshevik? So the SS helped foment the rage of the German people.  Sudetenland? The Czechs are persecuting the German minority there.  We must protect them.  Poland? they attacked the Fatherland.  See, Polish people attacked our settlements.  Attack.  France? They declared war on us after we defended ourselves against Poland, we must invade.  Belgium and Holland? They didn't let us in.  The Soviet Union?  Its the heartland of Jewish Bolshevism and see the Red Army was plotting to attack us first.  We had no choice but to attack them.  BTW, neocons still pimp this interpretation of the start of Barbarossa and so do those such as Viktor Suvorov.  Man, the neocons were so effective at this on that they had me parroting this interpretation of events at the time.  Then, well I read the source material.  Yeah, the Red Army was in no position to defend itself, let alone launch any sort of offensive war in 1941.  For much more on that read David Glantz's Stumbling Colossus.  

Anyways, everything the Nazis did to the Jews in Germany from the Nuremberg Laws to Kristallnacht was portrayed as countering the Jewish threat.  Every invasion the Germans did? That's right it was to defend the Fatherland.  The Soviet Union and every war crime they committed there? To defend the reich against Jewish Bolshevism.  People gobbled it up.  The experts and government and official media sold it that way.  The dissidents? They were silenced (brutally), and the White Rose Society? They were fucking beheaded.  

So yeah, the nazis were full of shit.  So are Netenyahu regime apologists and boy oh boy is the lingo in defense of their policies disturbingly similar.

Sorry too long to read. Read the last paragraph though. And no. People want to exterminate and end Israel. No one tried to exterminate Germans. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Herodotus said:

1. You're lying shithead, you did read the entire thing, you just didn't like it

2. You read the last paragraph without comprehension.  I take it your hatred of teachers comes from your failure to learn, but it's also possible you were the insolent type of little shit who not only refused to learn but tried to prevent others from learning as well.

3. From what I read, nobody wants to end Israel, they want Israel to end the illegal seizure of Palestinian homesteads, war crimes, and apartheid

4. Again, the threats to Germany being either greatly exaggerated or completely fabricated matters not.  What matters is that the German authorities and news media portrayed these almost non existent threats as existential and the average Kraut ate it up.  In much the same way as the Nazis  85 years ago, the Apartheid regime is using non existent threats as casus belli* to commit genocie and too few are questioning them on it.

 

*Because you actually are an imbecile, as opposed to merely playing one, casus belli means justification (just uh fuck a shun) for war. 

Non existent threats? Hamas broke the seize fire on 10/7. Children were murdered and taken from their homes. Why don't you sympathize with the Jewish hostages? Btw if you understood history the land is the Jews well before the Palestinians. I just hope they can someday live peacefully together. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RichJ said:

Israel's. Say  you didn't. Read it again.   You did say they were defending themselves which they really werent. If they were it isn't for the same reason as Israels. 

This is incomprehensible.

I have no idea what any of this means.

Take another crack at it.

  • Laugh 1

"The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date." ~ Gen. Mark (Killer) Kimmitt

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/911_newpearlharbor.pdf

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, TonyasTaters said:

Non existent threats? Hamas broke the seize fire on 10/7. 

What "seize fire" did they break?

  • Laugh 1

"The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date." ~ Gen. Mark (Killer) Kimmitt

http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/911_newpearlharbor.pdf

http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...