ICRockets2 Posted September 4 Author Share Posted September 4 4 minutes ago, shiva2999 said: So you say. So let's hear what composes the rest of the exchange. There were obviously more words than what you've cherry picked. What are they? If you want to know, watch the video. If you refuse to watch the video, you don't want to know and your line of questioning can be dismissed as overtly bad faith. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f8ta1ity54 Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 2 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said: If you want to know, watch the video. If you refuse to watch the video, you don't want to know and your line of questioning can be dismissed as overtly bad faith. That's all it ever is. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiva2999 Posted September 4 Share Posted September 4 1 hour ago, ICRockets2 said: If you want to know, watch the video. If you refuse to watch the video, you don't want to know and your line of questioning can be dismissed as overtly bad faith. It's your post. You pulled a fragment of a sentence out of the video and claimed it said something damning. When you intentionally ignore context, it's a pretty solid reason to suspect someone is trying to pull a fast one. Are you? Again? Quote "The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date." ~ Gen. Mark (Killer) Kimmitt http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/911_newpearlharbor.pdf http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted September 4 Author Share Posted September 4 2 minutes ago, shiva2999 said: You pulled a fragment of a sentence out of the video and claimed it said something damning. If you disagree, feel free to make an argument to that effect. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiva2999 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 9 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said: If you disagree, feel free to make an argument to that effect. I'm not going to waste my time refuting an argument that hasn't been made, only insinuated. Quote "The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date." ~ Gen. Mark (Killer) Kimmitt http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/911_newpearlharbor.pdf http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted September 5 Author Share Posted September 5 4 minutes ago, shiva2999 said: I'm not going to waste my time refuting an argument that hasn't been made, only insinuated. Make up your mind. Did I claim or did I insinuate? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiva2999 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 17 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said: Make up your mind. Did I claim or did I insinuate? They are not mutually exclusive. Quote "The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date." ~ Gen. Mark (Killer) Kimmitt http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/911_newpearlharbor.pdf http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted September 5 Author Share Posted September 5 1 minute ago, shiva2999 said: They are not mutually exclusive. Yeah they are. If I claim that Jimmy said something, that is different from insinuating he said that thing. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shiva2999 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 8 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said: Yeah they are. If I claim that Jimmy said something, that is different from insinuating he said that thing. The claim carries the insinuation. You claimed he said something which insinuated something yet are willing to ignore any consideration of context or even just the rest of the sentence. Don't be sneaky. You're not good at it. Quote "The Zarqawi PSYOP program is the most successful information campaign to date." ~ Gen. Mark (Killer) Kimmitt http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/archivos_pdf/911_newpearlharbor.pdf http://www.cooperativeresearch.org/project.jsp?project=911_project Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted September 5 Author Share Posted September 5 Just now, shiva2999 said: willing to ignore any consideration of context or even just the rest of the sentence. Nope. I considered the context before I posted. If you'd like me to consider it from a different angle, you need to present your case. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HipKat Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 8 hours ago, shiva2999 said: Prepare to be disappointed... Translation: I really have nothing else to do... 1 Quote “There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted September 5 Author Share Posted September 5 15 minutes ago, HipKat said: Translation: I really have nothing else to do... At this point I'm over 50% on Shiva being a paid troll who HAS to post this much or he loses his job. It would be anti-proletarian of me not to help him out, but it would be anti-me to treat him with a scintilla of respect. Hence our dynamic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f8ta1ity54 Posted September 5 Share Posted September 5 @shiva2999 out of curiosity, which politicain would you prefer to vote for/represent you based on their policy/policy advocacy? Bernie Sanders or Mitch McConnell? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.