Jump to content

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has been IMPEACHED


HipKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, Philly'sFinest said:

Sounds like he committed high treason if he blocked 2.5 million legal votes. I wonder why nothing has happened with this massive crime up until now?

You mean like him getting impeached?

6 minutes ago, Philly'sFinest said:

And once again...just because you claim something was debunked doesn't mean it was. This is always your go to line...just like you trying to discredit every source that doesn't fit your accepted version of the truth. The number of ballots he came up with was an estimate based on what he saw when he inspected the load and saw the ballots. If that's the best you can do to "dEbUnK" the claim from this hard working, truck driving Bills fan, then you have done nothing.

Just incase you said that, I did the debunking myself. Dispute a single thing I posted. Dispute Biden got more mail in ballots than Trump. I drove truck for 15 years - including hauling mail at times. Dispute what I know to be true about the driver's knowledge of how many ballots there were

6 minutes ago, Philly'sFinest said:

And then you say that since the truck disappeared the next day that it proves nothing? Does it prove your claim? Is it not suspicious and opens the possibility of it being taken so they could use those fraudulent ballots?

Does it prove another driver didn't hook up to it to continue it's trip to where ever it was going?? It's called drop and hook. This Jesse dude's time is up, shift is over, another hooks to it and keeps it going, since it was fucking time sensitive freight.

There's not one thing online that says the trailer was never found.

6 minutes ago, Philly'sFinest said:

Talk about swallowing. You have some serious blinders on, and you dismiss every and any claim because you simply can't even bring yourself to have the slightest bit of curiosity and skepticism when it comes to something that screams of shenanigans. 

I dismiss every claim that can be LOGICALLY and/or FACTUALLY disproven. 

6 minutes ago, Philly'sFinest said:

One day you'll see that you should have been better than this, and we'll be here for it

I hope you were looking in a mirror when you said that

  • Downvote 1

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/2/2023 at 11:27 PM, HipKat said:

You mean like him getting impeached?

Just incase you said that, I did the debunking myself. Dispute a single thing I posted. Dispute Biden got more mail in ballots than Trump. I drove truck for 15 years - including hauling mail at times. Dispute what I know to be true about the driver's knowledge of how many ballots there were

Does it prove another driver didn't hook up to it to continue it's trip to where ever it was going?? It's called drop and hook. This Jesse dude's time is up, shift is over, another hooks to it and keeps it going, since it was fucking time sensitive freight.

There's not one thing online that says the trailer was never found.

I dismiss every claim that can be LOGICALLY and/or FACTUALLY disproven. 

I hope you were looking in a mirror when you said that

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/06/jesse_morgan_and_the_200k_missing_ballots__an_update.html

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Philly'sFinest said:

Typical Philly "I found someone that agrees with me at the bottom the barrel" news source.

Meanwhile;

Quote

 

In its highly-redacted “Closing Memorandum,” the Post Office Inspector General (OIG) does not deny that Morgan was a subcontractor truck driver who took mail from Bethpage to Harrisburg, and then to Lancaster. The OIG claims that Morgan identified the wrong trailer number, and that his estimate of ballots could be much lower. The OIG also asserts:

Postal service employees working on October 21st could not recall directing [Morgan] to proceed to Lancaster (emphasis added).

 

Incase you're not sure what this means, it's that Morgan was wrong about his trailer number so his entire story is bullshit
You still haven't addressed the fact that IF this story was true, and since the HUGE majority of mail in ballots were for Biden, then it was Biden who logically would have been negatively affected by this, not Trump

Do better and we'll talk.

 

American Thinker - Questionable Source - Extreme Right Bias - Conservative - Republican - Fake News - Not Credible

Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias

Analysis / Bias

American Thinker consists of two sections, one is articles, and the other is a blog. You can check out their archives Here. 

In review, American Thinker uses strong emotionally loaded language in their headlines: “The Most Memorable Leftist Hypocrisies of 2017-8”. This article is authored by Robert Oscar Lopez, who writes with extremely biased language: “The left is composed of horrible people.  Most sane people realize this, even if they have friends on the dark side.” Another article with loaded wording is this one: “The Great Depression of 2019?” Although they utilize credible sources such as thebalance.comCNBCNew York TimesThe Guardian and factually mixed sources such as LifeZette, Wall Street Journal, Human Events.com, they also utilize questionable sources to back their claims, such as Breitbart and non-credible conservative blogs such as michaelsavage.com.  

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, American Thinker has published Anti-LGBT articles and those by prominent white nationalist Jared Taylor. Further, American Thinker routinely publishes conspiracy theories, such as those by Pamela Geller. The latter is also on the SPLC’s hate watch list due to anti-Islam positions: Report: Obama said ‘I Am a Muslim,’ which has been debunked as a false claim. They have also promoted conspiracies about the Seth Rich Murder, and they have published numerous articles that are not supportive of the consensus of science, such as this one: The Hoax of ‘Climate Change.’

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

 

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, HipKat said:

Typical Philly "I found someone that agrees with me at the bottom the barrel" news source.

Meanwhile;

Incase you're not sure what this means, it's that Morgan was wrong about his trailer number so his entire story is bullshit
You still haven't addressed the fact that IF this story was true, and since the HUGE majority of mail in ballots were for Biden, then it was Biden who logically would have been negatively affected by this, not Trump

Do better and we'll talk.

 

American Thinker - Questionable Source - Extreme Right Bias - Conservative - Republican - Fake News - Not Credible

Factual Reporting: Low - Not Credible - Not Reliable - Fake News - Bias

Analysis / Bias

American Thinker consists of two sections, one is articles, and the other is a blog. You can check out their archives Here. 

In review, American Thinker uses strong emotionally loaded language in their headlines: “The Most Memorable Leftist Hypocrisies of 2017-8”. This article is authored by Robert Oscar Lopez, who writes with extremely biased language: “The left is composed of horrible people.  Most sane people realize this, even if they have friends on the dark side.” Another article with loaded wording is this one: “The Great Depression of 2019?” Although they utilize credible sources such as thebalance.comCNBCNew York TimesThe Guardian and factually mixed sources such as LifeZette, Wall Street Journal, Human Events.com, they also utilize questionable sources to back their claims, such as Breitbart and non-credible conservative blogs such as michaelsavage.com.  

According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, American Thinker has published Anti-LGBT articles and those by prominent white nationalist Jared Taylor. Further, American Thinker routinely publishes conspiracy theories, such as those by Pamela Geller. The latter is also on the SPLC’s hate watch list due to anti-Islam positions: Report: Obama said ‘I Am a Muslim,’ which has been debunked as a false claim. They have also promoted conspiracies about the Seth Rich Murder, and they have published numerous articles that are not supportive of the consensus of science, such as this one: The Hoax of ‘Climate Change.’

Failed Fact Checks

Overall, we rate the American Thinker, Questionable based on extreme right-wing bias, promotion of conspiracy theories/pseudoscience, use of poor sources, and several failed fact checks.

 

LOL

You can't bring ballots from one state to another...that's not how it works. The "investigation" just so happened to say that the ballots may have been taken to Pennsylvania, but also maybe NY. This is done for a very specific reason.

And if you ever used your brain, you would realize that your site for "truth and facts" is always more favorited towards lefty sites. It is no better than any other BS site that claims to be above board when they themselves are just another con

If you watched this guy's press conferences and statements, you'd know that he didn't get mixed up on the details...he knew exactly what trailer he had.

But you will always believe in and land on the side that supports the conclusion you came to before the election even took place, and we all know why that is

T

D

S

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Philly'sFinest said:

LOL

You can't bring ballots from one state to another...that's not how it works. The "investigation" just so happened to say that the ballots may have been taken to Pennsylvania, but also maybe NY. This is done for a very specific reason.

Postal transfer sites are not in every city. Freight crosses lines to get form Hub to hub. The final destination for PA votes would still be PA

1 hour ago, Philly'sFinest said:

And if you ever used your brain, you would realize that your site for "truth and facts" is always more favorited towards lefty sites. It is no better than any other BS site that claims to be above board when they themselves are just another con

That's because lefty sites are less full of shit than the sites you use. That's the one thing you can't get your head around. I've posted the few times that MBFC gave bad reviews to a lefty site

1 hour ago, Philly'sFinest said:

If you watched this guy's press conferences and statements, you'd know that he didn't get mixed up on the details...he knew exactly what trailer he had.

Yet the OIG says different. Are you calling him a liar?

1 hour ago, Philly'sFinest said:

But you will always believe in and land on the side that...

...is telling the truth based on facts and logic

 

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/30/2023 at 3:24 PM, jpp said:

Politician gets busted for bribery.....Now a days any politician who doesnt commit some form of bribery likely doesnt climb that "political ladder"......in other words...there all corrupt one way or another...Left-right-up-down-sideways-him-her-pronouns-etc etc etc 

Fuck that "they're all the same" bullshit, it's a right wing meme meant to suppress democratic voter turnout.

Grow up and start thinking for yourself.

  • Downvote 1
do-you-think-this-republican-would-change-parties-today-full.jpg[/img]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, micknaboz said:

Fuck that "they're all the same" bullshit, it's a right wing meme meant to suppress democratic voter turnout.

Grow up and start thinking for yourself.

Ahh how sweet...you good little sheep...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
39 minutes ago, RichJ said:

Nice of Republicans to right a wrong.   If only dems did the same, Pelossi would have never been House majority leader. 

If Pelosi being House Majority Leader is the wrong you want righted, then she would have to have been it in order for there to be a wrong to right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RichJ said:

Meant speaker of the house. Thanks. 

No, what I'm saying is, in order for a wrong to be righted the wrong has to exist first.

Meaning she'd have had to BE Speaker for the wrong of her BEING SPEAKER to be righted.  

So saying "if the Dems had righted that wrong she'd never have been Speaker" is objectively untrue.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ICRockets2 said:

No, what I'm saying is, in order for a wrong to be righted the wrong has to exist first.

Meaning she'd have had to BE Speaker for the wrong of her BEING SPEAKER to be righted.  

So saying "if the Dems had righted that wrong she'd never have been Speaker" is objectively untrue.  

Wait....

What!!??

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, HipKat said:

Wait....

What!!??

I explained myself already.

In order to right a wrong, the wrong has to happen.  

Rich said that if the Democrats had righted their wrong Pelosi never would have been Speaker.

But that's not true.  The wrong he's suggesting is Pelosi being Speaker.  In order to right the wrong, she has to be Speaker first.  Otherwise there's nothing to right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

I explained myself already.

In order to right a wrong, the wrong has to happen.  

Rich said that if the Democrats had righted their wrong Pelosi never would have been Speaker.

But that's not true.  The wrong he's suggesting is Pelosi being Speaker.  In order to right the wrong, she has to be Speaker first.  Otherwise there's nothing to right.

Dude, she was the speaker for 8 years

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, HipKat said:

Dude, she was the speaker for 8 years

I am aware.  The part I'm saying is wrong is "NEVER would have been".

In order to right a wrong, the wrong must first exist.  So the Dems couldn't have righted the wrong of Pelosi being Speaker by never making her Speaker.  That's not righting a wrong.  She had to be Speaker in order for the wrong of her being Speaker to be righted.

This really isn't complicated, there's no reason I should have to explain what I'm saying this many times.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ICRockets2 said:

No, what I'm saying is, in order for a wrong to be righted the wrong has to exist first.

Meaning she'd have had to BE Speaker for the wrong of her BEING SPEAKER to be righted.  

So saying "if the Dems had righted that wrong she'd never have been Speaker" is objectively untrue.  

She's a crook and they still made her speaker of the house. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RichJ said:

That's where the wrong is . 

Yeah.  You can't right a wrong that never happened, so you can't say the Democrats would be righting a wrong by never making her speaker because in a universe where they never made Pelosi Speaker you couldn't describe them as having righted a wrong.

  • Eye Roll 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, RichJ said:

She's a crook and they still made her speaker of the house. 

Says a Trump apologist....

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RichJ said:

Lol. You butthurt about my blasting Pelossi too?

Why would I be?? Do you ever actually read my posts?? I called her out MANY times for being 1, too fucking old, 2, too out of touch, and 3, too fucking rich and priviledged

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, HipKat said:

Why would I be?? Do you ever actually read my posts?? I called her out MANY times for being 1, too fucking old, 2, too out of touch, and 3, too fucking rich and priviledged

Yet you reply as if you're defending the drunk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...