Jump to content

NYS voter database is completely untrustworthy, but we just had the most secure election ever


Recommended Posts

On 5/25/2023 at 10:02 PM, Philly'sFinest said:

Typical leftist retard response to anything that doesn't fit their own beliefs

 

He gets his info from Foodstamps Weekly. 

  • Laugh 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Philly'sFinest said:

Can you post links from a site that hasn't been caught manufacturing lies, please?

  • Laugh 1

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HipKat said:

Can you post links from a site that hasn't been caught manufacturing lies, please?

How about for once you simply try to prove that they are lies instead of just making a quick dismissive comment and pretending you are in the right.

You know for a fact that the he lost all 60 of his cases is false, but you don't wanna acknowledge it

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, TonyasTaters said:

Lmao he lost those cases. If you look up the case it clearly states that. No where does it say Trump won. OMG do you even read?

I'll give Philly the benefit of the doubt and do the hard work, organize by state with outcomes from his election-integrity.info site and let this illustrate how petty and insignificant they were but still allow him to say "well, he DID win some"

______________________________________________________________________________

Iowa
Vote-by-Mail (pre-populating ballots should not be allowed)
Granted Injunction.
Iowa counties were told to send blank ballots - didn't change the outcome

Vote-by-Mail (Signature Verification Standards; Claim that Mail Voting Leads to Fraud and/or Vote Dilution; Other Vote-by-Mail Issue)
Corrective Action Ordered - didn't change the outcome

Prepopulating of mail-in ballots
Injunction Granted, Stay Granted - didn't change the outcome

Minnesota
Vote-by-Mail (Mail Voting Deadlines [for Applying, Receiving, Postmark])
Granted Injunction. Sequestration of late ballots - Didn't change outcome

Objected to State not enforcing Minnesota’s Election-Day ballot receipt deadline
Denied request, Granted: Reversed lower court - Didn't change outcome

Pennsylvania
Vote-by-Mail (Sec of State can not allow ID proof to be delayed by several days)
Granted Injunction. Late ballots without ID not counted - Didn't change outcome

Vote-by-Mail (Mail Voting Deadlines [for Applying, Receiving, Postmark], etc.) [Plaintiff was Democratic Party]
Partial victory - didn't change the outcome

Wisconsin
Misleading info re absentee ballots
Granted motion for TRO - Didn't change outcome

Colorado
Objected to the Governor being able to change some of the Vote-by-Mail rules.
Denied on statutory basis then Overturned - didn't change the outcome

California
Governor can not bypass Legislature
Withdrawn as Governor complied - didn't change the outcome

Michigan
Clean-up, purge voter rolls
State agreed to update voter rolls - didn't change the outcome

Violations of State Election Laws re signature verification, etc
Granted - didn't change the outcome

Texas
County Clerk sending mail-in ballots to all voters in the election.
Insufficient evidence of harm, Over turned and agreed w Plaintiff - didn't change the outcome

Virginia
Enforce  statutes governing the acceptance of absentee ballots with respect to postmarks
Granted State agreed to update voter rolls - didn't change the outcome

Nevada
Request for various voter data
Mostly Granted - didn't change the outcome

Georgia
Improper ballot counting: ask to inspect ballots
Granted - didn't change the outcome

Arizona
Objection to State's voter deadline
Supported on statutory grounds, Overturned, Defective claims' - didn't change the outcome

DC
County objecting to a Senate investigation
Senate requests are legal - didn't change the outcome

  • Like 1

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Philly'sFinest said:

How about for once you simply try to prove that they are lies instead of just making a quick dismissive comment and pretending you are in the right.

You know for a fact that the he lost all 60 of his cases is false, but you don't wanna acknowledge it

Why do I need to when there are people who do it for a living and post their findings for everyone to read?

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...