LIBills Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 18 minutes ago, jamsim67 said: A good offensive coordinator takes what the defense gives him. Did anybody see the Bengals forcing the ball downfield in the wind and snow? No, because the Bill's and McStupid gave them all the room they needed to just march downfield, control the clock and head to Kansas City. McStupid (defensive guy), didn't even try. However, once again, he did say that they will learn from this. I'm not holding my breath ... Bill's fans who paid for a ticket, should have been given a refund. The Bills played that game, from the very start, like they did not want to be there. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamsim67 Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 9 hours ago, LIBills said: The Bills played that game, from the very start, like they did not want to be there. Exactly. I kept waiting for them to do something positive, thinking eventually they would begin to try and turn things around ... but nothing. Because of the weather, they could have, and should have played the same type of offense the Bengals were playing ... "strange" It doesn't take a great OC to know that you need to design your game-plan around the elements, because the weather will make it near impossible to throw the ball 30 plus yards downfield ... yet 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyasTaters Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 12 hours ago, LIBills said: The Bills played that game, from the very start, like they did not want to be there. I think the Bills were out coached. Allen had been looking for the big play most of all last season. Not having Beasley from the start took away his security blanket. The Bengals knew that and with the weather they took advantage of it. Also the lack of inside pressure allowed Cinci to make those short quick passes. I will say the Bengals loss may end up being a good thing. As I think it made the Bills realize they need better offensive weapons. If the Bills hung with them I think they would have gone defense in the first row nd this year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 On 5/20/2023 at 10:54 AM, drpepper said: The Bengals and Bills got together in the postseason, after the unexpectedly truncated game in Cincinnati to cap Week 17. Former Bills receiver Isaiah McKenzie recently claimed that, if the game had been played indoors, the home team would have won. McKenzie, now with the Colts, made the comments on a podcast with Tyler Dunne [more] View the full article no McKenzie never said the home team would have won. McKenzie only said it would have been a different game. That is true as Bills O sucks in bad weather. Quote cba fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Greg Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 24 minutes ago, cba fan said: no McKenzie never said the home team would have won. McKenzie only said it would have been a different game. That is true as Bills O sucks in bad weather. This is Bean's fault. As the GM he needs to do a better job with the roster as far as being able to play in bad weather. Outdoor stadium in Orchard Park. From rain, wind, snow you have a good chance you will be playing in bad weather at some point especially late in the season. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpikedLemonade Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 1 hour ago, TonyasTaters said: I think the Bills were out coached. Allen had been looking for the big play most of all last season. Not having Beasley from the start took away his security blanket. The Bengals knew that and with the weather they took advantage of it. Also the lack of inside pressure allowed Cinci to make those short quick passes. I will say the Bengals loss may end up being a good thing. As I think it made the Bills realize they need better offensive weapons. If the Bills hung with them I think they would have gone defense in the first row nd this year. OF COURSE THEY WERE. EVERY GAME WE HEAD INTO WITH McCOLLAPSY AS THE BILLS HC WE ARE AT A DISTINCT DISADVANTAGE Quote Do Your Part to Improve The Range -- Please put the TRIO OF TRUMP FLUFFERSTM on IGNORE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TonyasTaters Posted May 23 Share Posted May 23 1 hour ago, SpikedLemonade said: OF COURSE THEY WERE. EVERY GAME WE HEAD INTO WITH McCOLLAPSY AS THE BILLS HC WE ARE AT A DISTINCT DISADVANTAGE I don't think that is always the case. McDermott has won a lot of football games. BUT I think this year will determine is McDermott a Marty shottenheimer type coach who can only win the regular season or can he close the deal and win it all. I still think that is TBD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamsim67 Posted May 24 Share Posted May 24 10 hours ago, TonyasTaters said: I think the Bills were out coached. Allen had been looking for the big play most of all last season. Not having Beasley from the start took away his security blanket. The Bengals knew that and with the weather they took advantage of it. Also the lack of inside pressure allowed Cinci to make those short quick passes. I will say the Bengals loss may end up being a good thing. As I think it made the Bills realize they need better offensive weapons. If the Bills hung with them I think they would have gone defense in the first row nd this year. Not hard to out coach someone who fails to step up. They did absolutely nothing on both sides of the ball for a full four quarters. They didn't even bother to mail it in, as that would have been to much work. But they will learn from this, McStupid said so 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.