SVB Bank Crash

[deleted]

38 minutes ago, SackMan518 said:

Fascist? Oh honey, you don't even know what the word means!

But he can enroll in my Voter Coaching Services Program for a proper definition!!

[f8ta1ity54]

Just now, FanBack said:

Hate much, FascistalityDeconstructedSwastika?

And I didn't address the 'woke'.  I agree with your premise the bank did 'stupid shit': I disagree that government regulation is the answer.   Government speculation caused the depression; government suppression of the prime interest rate caused the housing crisis of the 2000s.  Thank you, Barney Frank.  Regulating didn't help there. 

down is up and up is down. got it. 

[deleted]

Just now, f8ta1ity54 said:

down is up and up is down. got it. 

You can't understand my nuanced thinking. 

[HipKat]

3 hours ago, ICRockets2 said:

Worth noting that the 28 billion went to farm OWNERS, not farm WORKERS, and the possibility exists that the farming lobby could even have been advocating for the tariffs behind the scenes knowing it would lead to an influx of wealth in the guise of corporate welfare

Good point

[HipKat]

2 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

Don't fool yourself. He wasn't bad especially in comparison to crimes committed by other Presidents. Woodrow Wilson sold out the entire country to a small cabal of bankers and wasn't even touched even though it has cost us nothing but financial misery since then. FDR bolstered a floundering communist government in Russia and then sent about a half million American military men to their death in WWII and created the biggest welfare deal in history. The Clintons sold military technology to the Chinese.

And what are Trump's crimes? Real estate value inflation, a couple bucks at some hotel, and fake Russian collusion fairy tale?

Like I said, you're too myopic in your analyses and can't see the giant picture here.

That's because I live in the here and right now more than the past and decisions that we can't just rescind. 

[HipKat]

2 hours ago, ICRockets2 said:

Cabal CAN be a generic term for any small party who controls something.

It can also be an antisemitic dogwhistle.

I've seen no evidence that you deserve the benefit of the doubt as to which one you intended.

If the majority of Bankers are Jews, then WTF is your faux-outrage about?

[ICRockets2]

1 minute ago, HipKat said:

If the majority of Bankers are Jews, then WTF is your faux-outrage about?

Who said the majority of bankers are Jews?

[HipKat]

6 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

Who said the majority of bankers are Jews?

You did 

[ICRockets2]

8 minutes ago, HipKat said:

You did 

I did?

[HipKat]

9 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

I did?

Yeah, Sack said a Cabal of bankers and you whipped the Jew card right the fuck out, without missing a beat

[ICRockets2]

7 minutes ago, HipKat said:

Yeah, Sack said a Cabal of bankers and you whipped the Jew card right the fuck out, without missing a beat

Because of the word cabal.

[HipKat]

46 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

Because of the word cabal.

It doesn’t matter why. Do you still brought it up. You still are the one that made that connection.

[ICRockets2]

23 minutes ago, HipKat said:

It doesn’t matter why. Do you still brought it up. You still are the one that made that connection.

No, Sack is the one that made the connection.  I'm the one who called him on it.

[jc856]

1 hour ago, ICRockets2 said:

No, Sack is the one that made the connection.  I'm the one who called him on it.

This is why it should be discussed.

many people hint at a central control by elites, operating behind the scenes.

it isn’t Sanchez, Vazquez, Hernandez, Fernandez or any other “ez” running banks.

its , Bergs, Steins, et al.

you don’t believe Jewish bankers have influence on world politics?

 

[ICRockets2]

24 minutes ago, jc856 said:

This is why it should be discussed.

many people hint at a central control by elites, operating behind the scenes.

it isn’t Sanchez, Vazquez, Hernandez, Fernandez or any other “ez” running banks.

its , Bergs, Steins, et al.

you don’t believe Jewish bankers have influence on world politics?

 

But it's not Bergs or Steins either.  

JPMorgan Chase is run by Jamie Dimon.  Not Jewish.

Bank of America is run by Warren Buffett.  Not Jewish.

Citigroup is run by John Dugan.  As far as I can tell, Not Jewish.  

 

[ICRockets2]

37 minutes ago, jc856 said:

This is why it should be discussed.

many people hint at a central control by elites, operating behind the scenes.

I think the majority of their operations are in broad daylight.  The world is run, by and large, by Capital.   There's no secret Illuminati or Freemason group pulling the strings.  It's just bog-standard bourgeoisie shit.

 

[jc856]

1 hour ago, ICRockets2 said:

I think the majority of their operations are in broad daylight.  The world is run, by and large, by Capital.   There's no secret Illuminati or Freemason group pulling the strings.  It's just bog-standard bourgeoisie shit.

 

Ok! There’s an answer.

could you expand on that?

are you saying a system of greed has been set up and our materialism dampens  our altruistic nature?

 

 

[ICRockets2]

30 minutes ago, jc856 said:

Ok! There’s an answer.

could you expand on that?

are you saying a system of greed has been set up and our materialism dampens  our altruistic nature?

 

 

From a Marxist perspective, one can look at the world through a lens called "Historical Materialism".  

In laymen's terms, it's the idea that the human race has been waging a class war from the beginning of our existence between the owners (the bourgeoisie) and the workers (the proletariat), and that the arc of justice is bent towards flattening the hierarchy that exists between these two groups.  

The two sides of that war have not always looked the same, of course.  In the past it has been landed aristocracy vs serfs or villagers or whatever you want to call them.  Or slave owners vs slaves.  But the recurring theme has been that the interests of those who own property- be it land, business, person, etc.- and those who work on that property are diametrically opposed.  What is good for the slave owner is obviously not good for the slave.  What is good for the serf tends to come at the expense of the lord.  Over time, we've worked (largely) collectively as humanity to abolish the monarchy, to abolish slavery, and we instituted a new and more equitable system: Capitalism.

In a capitalist system, anybody with the funds to do so can own property.  You can start a business.  You can buy up local housing and rent it.  I don't think you'll hear a single anti-capitalist who doesn't acknowledge that the system is superior to what came before.  We just think it ought to be- and can be- made even better.  

The system we want to implement is one where private property is abolished.  Landlords could no longer enrich themselves by buying up tons of housing and generate passive income by renting it out at a premium.  Bosses could no longer own companies by themselves and hoard the profits generated by workers.  Housing would be decommodified.  Businesses would be democratized.  

But that doesn't benefit the "global elite" or what have you.  If they can no longer get rich off another man's labor, then their relative place in the hierarchy is threatened.  If Elon Musk didn't have billions of dollars and had to make the case that he ought to be in charge of Twitter based on MERIT, there's no way he'd get to be in charge of Twitter because he's the single worst and unfunniest tweeter on the planet.  Likewise for a great deal of the bourgeoisie that knows the only special thing about them is the amount of 0's at the end of the number in their bank account.  So they lobby the government to make sure it works for THEM instead of working for US.  And they've been so successful in this endeavor that it's often 100% legal for them to do so.  

[Angry Byrds]

14 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

LOL. What a joke. Cabal is a generic term for any small party who controls something. Unfortunately you've told us that you're an anti-semite because you think all bankers are Jewish. I think I'll report your fat ass to the AJC and SPLC.

It’s pretty clear that he hates all religions not just Jews. 

[ICRockets2]

1 hour ago, Angry Byrds said:

It’s pretty clear that he hates all religions not just Jews. 

This is correct.  

[deleted]

14 hours ago, FanBack said:

You can't understand my nuanced thinking. 

Once again FanBack wins against the irrational hatred of a Goose-Stepping Fascist Thuggee.  BTW, Thuggee is the proper name for the cult of thieves that served under Thug Berham of India during the late 18th and early 19th century.   They were the scourge of British Colonialists.   Current Leftists, such as FascistalityDeconstructedSwastika, are far worse as they seek to subjugate their fellow countrymen.   The thuggees preyed on outsiders.

 

[Philly'sFinest]

 

[Angry Byrds]

4 hours ago, ICRockets2 said:

This is correct.  

That is a Nazi

[SackMan518]

15 hours ago, ICRockets2 said:

But it's not Bergs or Steins either.  

JPMorgan Chase is run by Jamie Dimon.  Not Jewish.

Bank of America is run by Warren Buffett.  Not Jewish.

Citigroup is run by John Dugan.  As far as I can tell, Not Jewish.  

 

Thanks for proving my point dumb ass! I asserted that a small cabal controls the banking industry, which is factual, but instead of addressing my statement you decided to turn it into a debate about whether it was a dog whistle against a certain group (which it wasn't). Yet, now you admit that the entire cabal is NOT composed solely of Jewish people which is something I had already said (this also applies to Globalists).

Now, I could easily play semantics here and swap out the word "cabal" for "cartel" but then I predict that you, Mr-Seeker-of-Racial-Grievances-and-Policer-of-Words, would likely say that it was another "dog whistle" slamming Hispanics. 

Now, I have a question for you, it's a simple yes or no, and depending on which option you choose I will have a statement for you. The question is: Are Jewish people White?

[SackMan518]

Kevin O’Leary Stuns CNN Panel Telling Them “Biden Just Nationalized U.S. Banking System”

 

The CNN panel was jaw-agape as Kevin O’Leary appeared earlier today to inform them the decision by Joe Biden to guarantee every deposit in U.S. regional banks is akin to “Joe Biden just nationalized the U.S. banking system.”

O’Leary is correct, and anyone who is holding assets like stocks or bonds in U.S. banks now needs to reconsider the disappeared line between government and the bank assets.  If the government can assume, control and backstop every single account balance within the bank, the government can assume and control all activity of the bank.

 

Downstream…. think about the consequences.  Remember the frozen bank accounts in Canada as a result of defining truck protest supporting Canadian citizens as domestic extremists?

Now think about the government no longer needing to ask the bank to take action, the govt has a regulatory ability to demand the bank to take action.  This takes “debanking” to an entire new level.  People are wondering why cryptocurrencies went up in value today.  There’s your answer.

Comrade citizens, at the end of this rainbow of bank nudges, we will find ourselves at the footsteps of a government controlled central bank digital currency.