ICRockets2 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 1 minute ago, Toofast80 said: 🤣 Aww, thank you for that, it made my minute! Force anybody that can produce and has produced enough to now support those that can’t/won’t/haven’t! Perfect way to create an equally deficient population (except those “elites”), good job commies 👍🤦♂️. The problem is capitalism doesn't reward people who produce, it rewards people who own what others produce. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 5 minutes ago, f8ta1ity54 said: Yea, it would save us time if you would just say it more explicitly the first time around. Government is the ultimate reason for all that creates these “bubbles”, when you then ask that same entity to counter the inevitable issue they created, it won’t work out as you think!!! 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f8ta1ity54 Posted March 9 Author Share Posted March 9 2 minutes ago, Toofast80 said: Government is the ultimate reason for all that creates these “bubbles”, when you then ask that same entity to counter the inevitable issue they created, it won’t work out as you think!!! 👍 No. It is capital influence on government that creates bubbles. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 1 minute ago, ICRockets2 said: The problem is capitalism doesn't reward people who produce, it rewards people who own what others produce. It does FAR better than the alternatives you’re offering! Since any “profit” will never “trickle down” to the populace. So capitalism still allows anybody (theoretically) to produce and be the benefactor of any “profits”. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 1 minute ago, f8ta1ity54 said: No. It is capital influence on government that creates bubbles. I don’t disagree with this. But it’s NOT just one thing! It’s humanity and the good or bad of it. Government is either the “top dog” (in your concept) or the “middle man” in capitalistic societies. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f8ta1ity54 Posted March 9 Author Share Posted March 9 2 minutes ago, Toofast80 said: I don’t disagree with this. But it’s NOT just one thing! It’s humanity and the good or bad of it. Government is either the “top dog” (in your concept) or the “middle man” in capitalistic societies. The government is accountable to the people. The capitalist class is not. Why would you put your eggs in the basket of those you can not hold accountable? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 44 minutes ago, f8ta1ity54 said: The government is accountable to the people. The capitalist class is not. Why would you put your eggs in the basket of those you can not hold accountable? This is a very naïveté statement, as expected. What makes you so sure “government is accountable to the people”!? If it was that way, it most likely wouldn’t have gotten to the point where you’re asking them to give you relief 🤔, since they would have already accounted for those issues. 🍻👋 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 2 minutes ago, Toofast80 said: This is a very naïveté statement Weren't you only a couple days ago mocking someone for saying "seize" instead of "cease"? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f8ta1ity54 Posted March 9 Author Share Posted March 9 1 minute ago, Toofast80 said: This is a very naïveté statement, as expected. What makes you so sure “government is accountable to the people”!? Because if you fuck up we vote you out. What dont you understand? 1 minute ago, Toofast80 said: If it was that way, it most likely wouldn’t have gotten to the point where you’re asking them to give you relief 🤔, since they would have already accounted for those issues. 🍻👋 When has the capitalist class NOT had an influence on our governement? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 13 minutes ago, Toofast80 said: It does FAR better than the alternatives you’re offering! Since any “profit” will never “trickle down” to the populace. So capitalism still allows anybody (theoretically) to produce and be the benefactor of any “profits”. Do you actually know what alternative I'm offering? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f8ta1ity54 Posted March 9 Author Share Posted March 9 4 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said: Do you actually know what alternative I'm offering? I like how he sneaks (theoretically) in there because he doesn't actually believe what he says either. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Herodotus Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 1 hour ago, ICRockets2 said: Correct. At the expense of people who work for a living. This is why landlords shouldn't exist. Fun fact, my house costs me 600 dollars a month for a mortgage payment. My neighbors pay 1300 dollars in rent for a slightly smaller house. In 27 (actually more like 16 to 20) my house is mine. In 27 years my neighbors don't own their home, some guy in Johnson Co will be using his tenants money to golf in Hawaii. Yeah, I'll either be selling my house to buy a small farm somewhere far from people while my neighbors or the people who come after them will be paying for some rich prick to fund his retirement. The goal is to make us a nation of renters and those with serious money are well on the way to making that happen. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 9 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said: Weren't you only a couple days ago mocking someone for saying "seize" instead of "cease"? And? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 7 minutes ago, f8ta1ity54 said: I like how he sneaks (theoretically) in there because he doesn't actually believe what he says either. I like how you and ICR are so naive and gullible to think that “government is accountable to the people” 🤦♂️! It’s a system, not one human voted out for the next voted in. Remember how you’re always crying about “systemic” issues or problems!? Excellent way to announce to everybody that you’ve never tried to function on your own in reality 👍. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f8ta1ity54 Posted March 9 Author Share Posted March 9 1 minute ago, Toofast80 said: I like how you and ICR are so naive and gullible to think that “government is accountable to the people” 🤦♂️! It’s a system, not one human voted out for the next voted in. Remember how you’re always crying about “systemic” issues or problems!? You think this is a gotcha or something? I also want voter/election reform. I want to end the electoral college. The US could be far more democratic than it is. Which would only help get rid of systemic issues. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 8 minutes ago, Toofast80 said: And? Statements can be "naïve" not "naïveté" so by your own standard you should feel like a fucking idiot right now 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 8 minutes ago, Toofast80 said: I like how you and ICR are so naive and gullible to think that “government is accountable to the people” 🤦♂️! It’s a system, not one human voted out for the next voted in. Remember how you’re always crying about “systemic” issues or problems!? Excellent way to announce to everybody that you’ve never tried to function on your own in reality 👍. Oh PWEASE mistew PWEASE don't tell us the govewnment isn't democwatic enough and we need to make it mowe democwatic that would own us socialists sooooooo hawd Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 7 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said: Statements can be "naïve" not "naïveté" so by your own standard you should feel like a fucking idiot right now A person can be “naïveté”, yes or no? You feel like a “fucking idiot” most of the time I presume! Since you haven’t a clue about most of what you’re commenting on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 “Naive or naïveté” vs. “cease or sieze”! ICR continues to be JUST above the lowest percentile on the range! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 That’s cute, ICR and F8 trying to combine their quotients towards that of a respectable individual humans. Good job guys/gals 👍 it’s at the least middling now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 9 minutes ago, Toofast80 said: A person can be “naïveté”, yes or no? You feel like a “fucking idiot” most of the time I presume! Since you haven’t a clue about most of what you’re commenting on. No. A person can be naïve. Naivete is not an adjective. Naïve is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 5 minutes ago, Toofast80 said: “Naive or naïveté” vs. “cease or sieze”! ICR continues to be JUST above the lowest percentile on the range! If they were using text-to-speech it's perfectly clear how one could end up wanting to use cease but end up with seize instead. Whereas you just admitted you don't know what article of speech naivete even falls under. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 6 minutes ago, Toofast80 said: a respectable individual humans. Good job retard Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 4 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said: If they were using text-to-speech it's perfectly clear how one could end up wanting to use cease but end up with seize instead. Whereas you just admitted you don't know what article of speech naivete even falls under. Admitted to what? Using “statement” after naïveté, instead of simply naïveté as a replacement for “ICR” or “F8”. 🤣 You calling me a “retard” is HILARIOUS, I love it. Coming from a simple stupid like yourself, that doesn’t offend me whatsoever. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted March 9 Share Posted March 9 “Using text to talk it’s understandable” another statement from naïveté! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.