Jump to content

Dilbert's Throat Slit in Execution Style for Being a RACIST


SpikedLemonade
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ICRockets2 said:

You pretend this is sarcasm but you're using the word completely wrong

Hey man, if I wanted more English lessons I'll go back to college and get a degree in that. Thanks though. You got any fitness routine suggestions? 

  • Laugh 1

Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Laugh 1

Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ICRockets2 said:

lol so it's not just Rich, you do it too

sign.jpg

Although I appreciate your efforts, you really are wasting your time dialoguing with these morons.

Do Your Part to Improve The Range -- Please put the TRIO OF TRUMP FLUFFERSTM  on IGNORE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ICRockets2 said:

lol so it's not just Rich, you do it too

It's an inaccurate description but you SO desperately want us to be Nazis and Fascists that you fight online in your little LARP world that we'll just entertain your delusions.

Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

It's an inaccurate description but you SO desperately want us to be Nazis and Fascists that you fight online in your little LARP world that we'll just entertain your delusions.

Your entire political agenda is focused on rooting out so-called "degeneracy".  You are a textbook Nazi.

  • Laugh 1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, ICRockets2 said:

Your entire political agenda is focused on rooting out so-called "degeneracy".  You are a textbook Nazi.

Assuming that this retard has even ever opened a textbook.

Do Your Part to Improve The Range -- Please put the TRIO OF TRUMP FLUFFERSTM  on IGNORE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/2/2023 at 1:13 PM, ICRockets2 said:

Birth control is not 100% effective.  If someone says "I used a condom" will you let them get an abortion?

Sure, is the morning after enough time or should we wait 6 mos to make that decision? Using a condom with spermicide and pulling out is pretty damn close to 100%. But why do that when you can just commit murder? But who can remember which one of these ladies are on birth control m. You can’t keep track of all of them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/2/2023 at 1:13 PM, ICRockets2 said:

Birth control is not 100% effective.  If someone says "I used a condom" will you let them get an abortion?

Sure, is the morning after enough time or should we wait 6 mos to make that decision? Using a condom with spermicide and pulling out is pretty damn close to 100%. But why do that when you can just commit murder? But who can remember which one of these ladies are on birth control m. You can’t keep track of all of them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/2/2023 at 1:13 PM, ICRockets2 said:

Birth control is not 100% effective.  If someone says "I used a condom" will you let them get an abortion?

Sure, is the morning after enough time or should we wait 6 mos to make that decision? Using a condom with spermicide and pulling out is pretty damn close to 100%. But why do that when you can just commit murder? But who can remember which one of these ladies are on birth control m. You can’t keep track of all of them.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/26/2023 at 3:06 PM, ICRockets2 said:

The problem is capitalism and the profit motives to ignore systemic racism. 

59% of black women have children from multiple fathers. 35% Hispanic, 22% white women. Is this the systematic racism you speak? At what point do you take responsibility for your own actions?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said:

Sure, is the morning after enough time or should we wait 6 mos to make that decision? Using a condom with spermicide and pulling out is pretty damn close to 100%. But why do that when you can just commit murder? But who can remember which one of these ladies are on birth control m. You can’t keep track of all of them.

Abortion isn't murder.  Murder has a specific legal definition.  

If you want to call it killing, you can do so.  But it is not murder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said:

59% of black women have children from multiple fathers. 35% Hispanic, 22% white women. Is this the systematic racism you speak? At what point do you take responsibility for your own actions?

You're exposing what a retarded piece of shit you are here.

Either you can complain that women are getting abortions or you can complain that they have kids with multiple partners.  You can't do both.  Otherwise a woman who has a kid with one person and then is abused by the father and leaves him is condemned to celibacy for the rest of her life in your dumbfuck world.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said:

59% of black women have children from multiple fathers. 35% Hispanic, 22% white women. Is this the systematic racism you speak? At what point do you take responsibility for your own actions?

By the way did you see the new bill that would let Florida legally kidnap trans kids?

We love protecting children don't we you fucking moron

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

You're exposing what a retarded piece of shit you are here.

Either you can complain that women are getting abortions or you can complain that they have kids with multiple partners.  You can't do both.  Otherwise a woman who has a kid with one person and then is abused by the father and leaves him is condemned to celibacy for the rest of her life in your dumbfuck world.

I commend those who have the children and take responsibility. What I’m saying is YOU think they should have an abortion instead of having multiple children because many don’t have a father figure to look up to. You just can’t read. But when having sex people need to be more responsible. That would eliminate the need for abortions. I like how you put words in peoples mouth though. You’re good at it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

By the way did you see the new bill that would let Florida legally kidnap trans kids?

We love protecting children don't we you fucking moron

Oh you mean the one where one of the PARENTS can take the child across state lines if the other parent wants to change a CHILDS sex? Are you really that dumb to think that strangers are allowed to kidnap children? Are you that stupid? Please tell me this is what you thought because this definitely what you just said.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said:

 when having sex people need to be more responsible. That would eliminate the need for abortions. 

Wow, I never knew that if you use a condom it filters out the sperm that carry birth defects that's wild

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said:

Oh you mean the one where one of the PARENTS can take the child across state lines if the other parent wants to change a CHILDS sex? Are you really that dumb to think that strangers are allowed to kidnap children? Are you that stupid? Please tell me this is what you thought because this definitely what you just said.

I said precisely what the bill does.  It lets THE STATE seize custody of a child if that child is trans.
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

I said precisely what the bill does.  It lets THE STATE seize custody of a child if that child is trans.
 

 

Yeah, that’s what I said if on parent is opposed with child have sex-reassignment. It should be up to both parents. A child should not make that decision. I’ve made this clear before

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Angry Byrds said:

Yeah, that’s what I said if on parent is opposed with child have sex-reassignment. It should be up to both parents. A child should not make that decision. I’ve made this clear before

The child doesn't make the decision.  The family and the doctors all make it together.  But I think you'd agree the child should DRIVE the decision, right?  Otherwise that's parents pushing it on the kid and that's obviously bad.  The only kids who should be receiving gender-affirming care are the ones who say voluntarily that they want it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said:

Yeah, that’s what I said if on parent is opposed with child have sex-reassignment. It should be up to both parents. A child should not make that decision. I’ve made this clear before

The bill states that previous custody rulings are not to be taken into consideration.  So let's say we've got a dad who loves his trans son and a mom who's really upset that her "daughter" wants to transition.  That mom is incredibly verbally and emotionally abusive, and one day that escalates to physical abuse that hospitalizes the kid.  The dad says enough is enough and files for divorce/full custody.  The court finds that the mom's behavior was in fact abusive and awards custody to the father.  

6 months later, this bill passes.  Repressive laws against gender-affirming care in the state of Florida force the father and son to seek treatment in...let's say Georgia instead.  

You think it's GOOD that cops could kidnap that child and a judge could force them to go live with their abusive mother?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

The bill states that previous custody rulings are not to be taken into consideration.  So let's say we've got a dad who loves his trans son and a mom who's really upset that her "daughter" wants to transition.  That mom is incredibly verbally and emotionally abusive, and one day that escalates to physical abuse that hospitalizes the kid.  The dad says enough is enough and files for divorce/full custody.  The court finds that the mom's behavior was in fact abusive and awards custody to the father.  

6 months later, this bill passes.  Repressive laws against gender-affirming care in the state of Florida force the father and son to seek treatment in...let's say Georgia instead.  

You think it's GOOD that cops could kidnap that child and a judge could force them to go live with their abusive mother?

And you think this is a likely scenario? I think it will be case by case. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...