thinwhiteduke Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 Start at -10:00- minute mark. Trust me. This is good. SJ you're gonna like this. I can't embed this video here for what ever reason. Just make the extra click. We, The common man is wise to it all. These kids are good. https://www.youtube.com/live/4pTY_UwGXgg?feature=share Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 11 hours ago, thinwhiteduke said: Start at -10:00- minute mark. Trust me. This is good. SJ you're gonna like this. I can't embed this video here for what ever reason. Just make the extra click. We, The common man is wise to it all. These kids are good. https://www.youtube.com/live/4pTY_UwGXgg?feature=share YouTube is in bed with the man and totally corrupt pushing the One World Order bs, lost civilizations on the bottom of the ocean, and alien bases on the dark side of the Moon. Can't believe anything they put out. It is all cheap Lubetube for the masses to get tin foil hats in a lather. Why would you believe any of this fake WWE crap? You can see that setup is fake. Probably a blue screen behind them and they are all in the same studio. Quote cba fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikgaes Posted January 31 Share Posted January 31 I started at 10:00 and stopped when the dude kept saying that no one heard of Patrick Mahomes in college. Wrong. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinwhiteduke Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 The ignorance of you people lol. He in fact makes a brilliant point. Both teams in 5 super bowls combined after Rams move from Missouri. When /NFL is supposed to pay money to Missouri for taking Rams out. Are you fucking kidding me that you just cant see that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinwhiteduke Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 2 hours ago, cba fan said: YouTube is in bed with the man and totally corrupt pushing the One World Order bs, lost civilizations on the bottom of the ocean, and alien bases on the dark side of the Moon. Can't believe anything they put out. It is all cheap Lubetube for the masses to get tin foil hats in a lather. Why would you believe any of this fake WWE crap? You can see that setup is fake. Probably a blue screen behind them and they are all in the same studio. One world order bs? A. It's already here. B. That has nothing to do with this. It's simply collusion that you're too ignorant to see. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinwhiteduke Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 2 hours ago, mikgaes said: I started at 10:00 and stopped when the dude kept saying that no one heard of Patrick Mahomes in college. Wrong. Irrelevant to the rest of it. Stop avoiding like a child and listen Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinwhiteduke Posted January 31 Author Share Posted January 31 3 hours ago, cba fan said: YouTube is in bed with the man and totally corrupt pushing the One World Order bs, lost civilizations on the bottom of the ocean, and alien bases on the dark side of the Moon. Can't believe anything they put out. It is all cheap Lubetube for the masses to get tin foil hats in a lather. Why would you believe any of this fake WWE crap? You can see that setup is fake. Probably a blue screen behind them and they are all in the same studio. Hey, can you read? Rams owner Stan Kroenke forced to pay staggering $571 million of NFL's St. Louis settlement, per report. And what SB is Chiefs in, huh? Come on, you know the answer.... 57. 57. 57. But Yeah just all honesty and coincidence around here, right? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinwhiteduke Posted February 1 Author Share Posted February 1 Stop ignoring blatant truth Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinwhiteduke Posted February 1 Author Share Posted February 1 Arian Foster today Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StraightJ Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 8 hours ago, thinwhiteduke said: One world order bs? A. It's already here. B. That has nothing to do with this. It's simply collusion that you're too ignorant to see. I have not watched it yet but intend to in a moment, and wanted to reply to this first. It's hilarious, and being Davos was like a week ago, it reminds me last year of putting that word in a search engine engine being I heard some meeting being mentioned The result I clicked on has stuck in my head and I thought of making a thread about it because I wanted to see if I was the only one who wound the absurdity of the dishonesty hilarious or not. I think the article was from 2018(important, that it was relatively recent), and it was a British online paper site, where I fairly often get some of my news from, but unsure which. It starts in the beginning like something ICR2 copies and pastes when I mention something, with labeling folks who looj into what goes on their with the an ad homimem slut or something about believing in world government...... and the meeting, IIRC, is called "The Council on World Governance"!!! Goes to show you how low the bar is set by MSM. SMH. I'm not feeling industrious at the moment and without re-reading what @cba fan said, I didnt take it the same way as you and actually agreed, at least to an extent, from how I took it. You know darned well that certain well-known truths amongst the diligent are banned on there, and then even controlled opposition who mix truth with red herrings like Alex Jones are banned too(they can't make it too obvious, and I find that sincere people are always questioning). (man , I went from feeling the caffeine to drowsey....anyhow cutting and pasting JA17's statement's on conspiracy theories 2 days after the playoff game....trying to shorten posts somewhat lol) Quote Andy did you hear about this one?-REM . "I don't think I'm easy to talk about. I've got a very irregular head. And I'm not anything that you think I am anyway". -Syd Barrett, founder of Pink Floyd. Rolling Stone, December 1971. https://nativeamericanchurches.org/ My Adopt A Bill is Stefon Diggs My 2nd Adopt A Bill is Christian Wade(he gets an exemption and doesn't require a spot) :) Being staff seemed unable to train an elite legend how to run, Cole Beasley is my backup. (I doubt that explanation is wanted). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StraightJ Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Kyle Brandt or whomever...leading into the HAMLIN question asked Josh Allen if he was into conspiracy theories, giving him a chance to do an Aaron Rodgers and laugh and say no and mock flat earthers...which he surprised me by not doing, but then like Rodgers doing, but at the very end showing an incredible amount of maturity, logical function, and in this day and age courage after denouncing the flat earth theory overall. When he surprised me by saying he found them interesting, and seemed to make a wise choice when Kyle put him on the spot asking (his favorite?), he went with something relatively safe and certainly very well supported, the moon landing(do any deniers of the fakery have an explanation why the Josh Allen belt was an issue now and not then, unless that is a lie and they are going covertly...... or how when there is supposed to be one source of light why there is a photo with 2 rocks maybe 5 feet apart with shadows at nearly 90 degree angles? I'm asking sincerely, being itg's something that while interesting to me, hasn't been important enough to do a lot of research on. That one came from the guy whom they actually accidentally gave him the wrong reels when he requested them for a documentary, and got stuff he wasn't supposed to see(allegedly, there is so much fakery(f***ery) these days . ( @thinwhiteduke, I did not and still do not mean to hijack your thread, and for a change am not going to abort this post like I more often do, even with[especially with] long posts. I intend to discuss what you intended the thread to be about, whether or not I agree. Whether filters are weakened from being groggy like now or amped, I've found I long to encourage any of inner liberty in myself and others, as both secular psychologists and spiritual folk say the outer and inner world are reflective of one another. Ok, about to watch video) Anyhow too tired to even finish what I was getting at in the previous post correctly now, other than to say I was impressed with JFA17's "reprise" at the end, the Kyle Brandt video involving something a family member of mine who identifies as a scientist says, about seeing it with your own. While it's on my mind, if anyone who has heard someone who believes in flat earth theory asked/answer the question why does it matter(I know better than to open anyone to ridicule who may believe in such), that's a question I'd like answered. Apparently it doesn't hurt the establishment in the pocketbook or in any other direct way enough to make it more harmful to leaver up than to draw attention to by banning. They talk about Antartica and the treaty....but so did Admiral Byrd( @Angry Byrds) and hollow earth.... and maybe whatever the heck the Germans were doing down there was in the Globalists' eyes(along with ensuring the survival and spread of Communism) worth what "we" did to them down there and elsewhere? Again, not something relevant enough to current day(unlike the many, many, many deeply hurtful to many effects the lies regarding WW2 itself still have today, along with the pain helping the 2 Communist powers survive brought to hundreds of millions(regardless if on a globe of plane "lol"). As adults we should be able to ask such questions and have civil discourse without the CIA-instilled conditioned fear of being mocked like some here proudly wear an armband to announce(a real lol for that, that "not questioning" is being rewarded and in effect conditioning a survival trait out of folks. Some of you may hate me for any number of reasons, but those of us who question authority are to various extents fighting for your liberty, more so, and rather in opposition to those we were taught to assume are(military and the press oligopoly, who indeed are fighting tooth and nail against nationalism, and literally conjuring oppression(both literally real, and real enough in the minds of many to matter) where it dd not exist before.... which in its least harmful outcome is still another distraction like @cba fan mentioned. I mean even for someone like me that is aware the best shamans were said to be fairl equal in masculine and feminine energy, it doesnt mean you need to invent 80 or however many genders there are and make it complex where you need to be Belichick to get it. I started to notice the "Subdivisions" in musical(and accompanying fashion) genres.... Despite the best efforts of th1 1%, and despite his recent over the top antics added to the shtick, The Wisdom Of The @daryls61 in his sig is some of the best that could help our society pull a Josh Allen and come back, and/or a Picard and defy the Borg rather than enabling their efforts to assimilate others.(Or defying the Empire in Star Wars....which seemingly from the time of the original trilogy morphed from the USSR into....... Quote Andy did you hear about this one?-REM . "I don't think I'm easy to talk about. I've got a very irregular head. And I'm not anything that you think I am anyway". -Syd Barrett, founder of Pink Floyd. Rolling Stone, December 1971. https://nativeamericanchurches.org/ My Adopt A Bill is Stefon Diggs My 2nd Adopt A Bill is Christian Wade(he gets an exemption and doesn't require a spot) :) Being staff seemed unable to train an elite legend how to run, Cole Beasley is my backup. (I doubt that explanation is wanted). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanqueray Ten Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 Thanks for the post OP - I hadn't thought of this one before and it's definitely going into my quiver. I'm not going to watch the video, but I'm firmly in the super bowls are not won, they are awarded camp. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinwhiteduke Posted February 1 Author Share Posted February 1 6 minutes ago, StraightJ said: Kyle Brandt or whomever...leading into the HAMLIN question asked Josh Allen if he was into conspiracy theories, giving him a chance to do an Aaron Rodgers and laugh and say no and mock flat earthers...which he surprised me by not doing, but then like Rodgers doing, but at the very end showing an incredible amount of maturity, logical function, and in this day and age courage after denouncing the flat earth theory overall. When he surprised me by saying he found them interesting, and seemed to make a wise choice when Kyle put him on the spot asking (his favorite?), he went with something relatively safe and certainly very well supported, the moon landing(do any deniers of the fakery have an explanation why the Josh Allen belt was an issue now and not then, unless that is a lie and they are going covertly...... or how when there is supposed to be one source of light why there is a photo with 2 rocks maybe 5 feet apart with shadows at nearly 90 degree angles? I'm asking sincerely, being itg's something that while interesting to me, hasn't been important enough to do a lot of research on. That one came from the guy whom they actually accidentally gave him the wrong reels when he requested them for a documentary, and got stuff he wasn't supposed to see(allegedly, there is so much fakery(f***ery) these days . ( @thinwhiteduke, I did not and still do not mean to hijack your thread, and for a change am not going to abort this post like I more often do, even with[especially with] long posts. I intend to discuss what you intended the thread to be about, whether or not I agree. Whether filters are weakened from being groggy like now or amped, I've found I long to encourage any of inner liberty in myself and others, as both secular psychologists and spiritual folk say the outer and inner world are reflective of one another. Ok, about to watch video) Anyhow too tired to even finish what I was getting at in the previous post correctly now, other than to say I was impressed with JFA17's "reprise" at the end, the Kyle Brandt video involving something a family member of mine who identifies as a scientist says, about seeing it with your own. While it's on my mind, if anyone who has heard someone who believes in flat earth theory asked/answer the question why does it matter(I know better than to open anyone to ridicule who may believe in such), that's a question I'd like answered. Apparently it doesn't hurt the establishment in the pocketbook or in any other direct way enough to make it more harmful to leaver up than to draw attention to by banning. They talk about Antartica and the treaty....but so did Admiral Byrd( @Angry Byrds) and hollow earth.... and maybe whatever the heck the Germans were doing down there was in the Globalists' eyes(along with ensuring the survival and spread of Communism) worth what "we" did to them down there and elsewhere? Again, not something relevant enough to current day(unlike the many, many, many deeply hurtful to many effects the lies regarding WW2 itself still have today, along with the pain helping the 2 Communist powers survive brought to hundreds of millions(regardless if on a globe of plane "lol"). As adults we should be able to ask such questions and have civil discourse without the CIA-instilled conditioned fear of being mocked like some here proudly wear an armband to announce(a real lol for that, that "not questioning" is being rewarded and in effect conditioning a survival trait out of folks. Some of you may hate me for any number of reasons, but those of us who question authority are to various extents fighting for your liberty, more so, and rather in opposition to those we were taught to assume are(military and the press oligopoly, who indeed are fighting tooth and nail against nationalism, and literally conjuring oppression(both literally real, and real enough in the minds of many to matter) where it dd not exist before.... which in its least harmful outcome is still another distraction like @cba fan mentioned. I mean even for someone like me that is aware the best shamans were said to be fairl equal in masculine and feminine energy, it doesnt mean you need to invent 80 or however many genders there are and make it complex where you need to be Belichick to get it. I started to notice the "Subdivisions" in musical(and accompanying fashion) genres.... Despite the best efforts of th1 1%, and despite his recent over the top antics added to the shtick, The Wisdom Of The @daryls61 in his sig is some of the best that could help our society pull a Josh Allen and come back, and/or a Picard and defy the Borg rather than enabling their efforts to assimilate others.(Or defying the Empire in Star Wars....which seemingly from the time of the original trilogy morphed from the USSR into....... Ok, um, so about the video and what he said...... anything about that? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StraightJ Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 And really quickly before watching the video(oddly, I didn't recall until the very end of those 2 posts....despite the conspiracy theories often floated on this board on so many different subjects, and mow with SO many mentions of them in football and even @mixum and others mentioning Bills' specific ones, I seem to think only @jamsim67 reminded me of the most obvious one which I had also seen mentioned elsewhere after clicking on a link to a video in some thread from someone bitter (,maybe @seandelevan?) where 2 guys were supposed to tear McDermott a new one for about 5 minutes[which seemed milder in actuality]...... Anyhow, I've written much more than intended but it wouldn't feel right to leave Jamsim and whomever else hanging without getting the simplest one(Occam's Razor?) out there?. I hadn't even considered it, but looking back on that interview, maybe Kyle Brandt wasn't due all the praise for the magic he worked on Josh? Sincerely I didn't recall it til now, so I'm gonna let Jam decide if he wants to discuss it, and keep my word to TWD if I don't pass out. (I did bring up the issue with this hypothesis, unlike anyone else who replied to it in the Shoutbox, but I don't immediately shout down an something just because I didn't consider it on my own). Quote Andy did you hear about this one?-REM . "I don't think I'm easy to talk about. I've got a very irregular head. And I'm not anything that you think I am anyway". -Syd Barrett, founder of Pink Floyd. Rolling Stone, December 1971. https://nativeamericanchurches.org/ My Adopt A Bill is Stefon Diggs My 2nd Adopt A Bill is Christian Wade(he gets an exemption and doesn't require a spot) :) Being staff seemed unable to train an elite legend how to run, Cole Beasley is my backup. (I doubt that explanation is wanted). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamsim67 Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 27 minutes ago, thinwhiteduke said: Ok, um, so about the video and what he said...... anything about that? Just go to Rashard Mendenhall telling us the reason he retired was because he's not an entertainer. While I always thought the games were controlled, it wasn't until this season, and games where the Bill's and JA seemed to be allowing the opposition to stay in the game, or win. And then there was the Bengals coming to Buffalo, and the Bill's taking a dive, and McDermott telling us they would learn from it. lmao I watched the refs, and the players decide who would be playing in the SB. Players get paid huge salaries for a reason ... they keep their mouth's shut. The problem with sports entertainment, is that for those who don't realize it's all made up nonsense, the joke is on them and they are paying lots of hard earned money to participate. Owners, management, coaches and players all participating to not only lie to, but steal from their fans. Welcome to the World Football Federation. I hate it, and I would love for stadiums to be empty next year. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 16 hours ago, thinwhiteduke said: Hey, can you read? Rams owner Stan Kroenke forced to pay staggering $571 million of NFL's St. Louis settlement, per report. And what SB is Chiefs in, huh? Come on, you know the answer.... 57. 57. 57. But Yeah just all honesty and coincidence around here, right? yes, i can type too, Kroenke was given a huge discount by NFL as Kroenke blackmailed owners. Kroenke agreed to pay any/all legal bills; fees/settlements owed St Louis involving any part of him moving Rams to LA. He agreed to this in return for owners to approve his move from St louis. Without this guarantee, Kroenke did not have the needed votes from other owners to approve Rams move to LA. Where FYI he now rakes financially with the team, a team paying him rent(Chargers)and more so with the mega-lucrative RE development deal he has control over around SOFI stadium. So after the done deal Kroenke backs out when St Louis threatens litigation for the illegal move. NFL violated it's own franchise relocation rules so legal advice was to settle. Kroenke threatened to settle only for Rams and leave the other owners to fend for themselves which could have amounted to billions more depending on what precedent would be set by what Kroenke would pay St Louis. Ironically the more Kroenke paid St Louis would result in more the other owners might have to pay. EX Kroenke pays 500 mill. That would give legal ammo for St Louis to ask for 500 mill from each of the other NFL owners. NFL did not want to risk that. Kroenke being the prime party legally, would be reasonably expected to pay more per owner but not unreasonable for each NFL owner to be held liable to pay at least half what Kroenke paid each for 7.75 billion. Or 15.5 billion if court rules they all must pay what Kroenke pays. This is why NFL floated idea of giving St Louis an expansion team to cover some(or end the litigation +lower the cash settlement) or even all of the expected legal windfall. St Louis should have held out for that as it was worth more than the 790 million they received from Kroenke and NFL in total. And NFL franchise keeps making city money. He was dirty. Owners have stated on public record they would have never approved the move without Kroenke's guarantee and if they knew then what they know now(that Kroenke would renege on the deal) Rams would not have been allowed to move. Quote cba fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinwhiteduke Posted February 1 Author Share Posted February 1 4 hours ago, cba fan said: yes, i can type too, Kroenke was given a huge discount by NFL as Kroenke blackmailed owners. Kroenke agreed to pay any/all legal bills; fees/settlements owed St Louis involving any part of him moving Rams to LA. He agreed to this in return for owners to approve his move from St louis. Without this guarantee, Kroenke did not have the needed votes from other owners to approve Rams move to LA. Where FYI he now rakes financially with the team, a team paying him rent(Chargers)and more so with the mega-lucrative RE development deal he has control over around SOFI stadium. So after the done deal Kroenke backs out when St Louis threatens litigation for the illegal move. NFL violated it's own franchise relocation rules so legal advice was to settle. Kroenke threatened to settle only for Rams and leave the other owners to fend for themselves which could have amounted to billions more depending on what precedent would be set by what Kroenke would pay St Louis. Ironically the more Kroenke paid St Louis would result in more the other owners might have to pay. EX Kroenke pays 500 mill. That would give legal ammo for St Louis to ask for 500 mill from each of the other NFL owners. NFL did not want to risk that. Kroenke being the prime party legally, would be reasonably expected to pay more per owner but not unreasonable for each NFL owner to be held liable to pay at least half what Kroenke paid each for 7.75 billion. Or 15.5 billion if court rules they all must pay what Kroenke pays. This is why NFL floated idea of giving St Louis an expansion team to cover some(or end the litigation +lower the cash settlement) or even all of the expected legal windfall. St Louis should have held out for that as it was worth more than the 790 million they received from Kroenke and NFL in total. And NFL franchise keeps making city money. He was dirty. Owners have stated on public record they would have never approved the move without Kroenke's guarantee and if they knew then what they know now(that Kroenke would renege on the deal) Rams would not have been allowed to move. My god,...how fucking stupid are you? 571 million before super bowl 57 means they are mocking you fans. It's the wealthy playing games. Rams in 2 SBs., KC in 3 since the move. It means they blatantly knew to profit both cities and owners to cushion the blow of the lawsuit. Not to mention out of no where the Blues reach finals and the royals had been to series a couple years before Rams moved. You have to be one the dumbest human beings alive. You can't be real. And you say you believe in a god as well? The ask him if I'm right. Let's see what your excuse is then. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kelly's Heroes Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 16 minutes ago, thinwhiteduke said: My god,...how fucking stupid are you? 571 million before super bowl 57 means they are mocking you fans. It's the wealthy playing games. Rams in 2 SBs., KC in 3 since the move. It means they blatantly knew to profit both cities and owners to cushion the blow of the lawsuit. Not to mention out of no where the Blues reach finals and the royals had been to series a couple years before Rams moved. You have to be one the dumbest human beings alive. You can't be real. And you say you believe in a god as well? The ask him if I'm right. Let's see what your excuse is then. This is "Q"-level stupid shit. Man, go away with your conspiracy crap. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinwhiteduke Posted February 1 Author Share Posted February 1 14 minutes ago, Kelly's Heroes said: This is "Q"-level stupid shit. Man, go away with your conspiracy crap. So your reading comprehension is poor as well I see. What the fuck does Q have to do with it? Q is a govt created fake entity as well. Confront how this is possible without premeditated execution. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 5 hours ago, thinwhiteduke said: My god,...how fucking stupid are you? 571 million before super bowl 57 means they are mocking you fans. It's the wealthy playing games. Rams in 2 SBs., KC in 3 since the move. It means they blatantly knew to profit both cities and owners to cushion the blow of the lawsuit. Not to mention out of no where the Blues reach finals and the royals had been to series a couple years before Rams moved. You have to be one the dumbest human beings alive. You can't be real. And you say you believe in a god as well? The ask him if I'm right. Let's see what your excuse is then. I don't believe in God....and i am waiting for StraightJ to weigh in before making any hash reactions or decisions. Quote cba fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinwhiteduke Posted February 1 Author Share Posted February 1 2 minutes ago, cba fan said: I don't believe in God....and i am waiting for StraightJ to weigh in before making any hash reactions or decisions. Fine, you don't. The rest of what said still applies. I gave you blatant examples of collusion and you deny, deny, deny 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cba fan Posted February 1 Share Posted February 1 3 minutes ago, thinwhiteduke said: Fine, you don't. The rest of what said still applies. I gave you blatant examples of collusion and you deny, deny, deny white white white...... we have been friends a long time. You have deny deny deny in your blood since we met, as well. Quote cba fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tanqueray Ten Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 Is there a thread buried somewhere that has a list of boxes the Bills have checked for being awarded a super bowl title? Stuff like new ownership (minority ownership a plus...), get a likeable stud QB to lead a high powered offense, sell out current stadium, build new stadium and sell that one out too? I think the Bills are definitely on the right track, and that this just wasn't their year for a multitude of reasons. I've got more to add to these and other bullet points, just wondering if the conversation has been taking place and I've missed it??? It has to be Bills Specific, or I'll start a new one. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zan186 Posted February 2 Share Posted February 2 On 2/1/2023 at 1:39 PM, Kelly's Heroes said: This is "Q"-level stupid shit. Man, go away with your conspiracy crap. Why would Q be considered stupid? If someone was whistle blowing covertly....how is that considered stupid? There are those who's eye's are wide open, those who are still sleeping and then those who refuse to believe even when they see it.... 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thinwhiteduke Posted March 15 Author Share Posted March 15 On 2/1/2023 at 4:22 PM, Tanqueray Ten said: Is there a thread buried somewhere that has a list of boxes the Bills have checked for being awarded a super bowl title? Stuff like new ownership (minority ownership a plus...), get a likeable stud QB to lead a high powered offense, sell out current stadium, build new stadium and sell that one out too? I think the Bills are definitely on the right track, and that this just wasn't their year for a multitude of reasons. I've got more to add to these and other bullet points, just wondering if the conversation has been taking place and I've missed it??? It has to be Bills Specific, or I'll start a new one. But the fact is they've made the playoffs multiple times now while saying a new stadium was coming. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.