f8ta1ity54 Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 Just now, Angry Byrds said: I will go ahead and listen to what the attorneys say. But thanks for your input it will be duly noted. But, you said you heard both ways. How did you determine which way to pick? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
IrishLass Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Byrds Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 2 minutes ago, f8ta1ity54 said: But, you said you heard both ways. How did you determine which way to pick? I didn’t, I said I will listen to what the attorneys say, unless you’re an attorney who specializes in political law. So far it’s all quiet and most likely nothing will come of it. Nice try though Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f8ta1ity54 Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 2 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said: I didn’t, I said I will listen to what the attorneys say, unless you’re an attorney who specializes in political law. So far it’s all quiet and most likely nothing will come of it. Nice try though 53 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said: I’ve read it both ways that an ex president does and doesn’t have clearance from lawyers. You read it both ways, sorry I wasn't exact. So how did you determine which lawyer was correct? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Byrds Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 17 minutes ago, f8ta1ity54 said: You read it both ways, sorry I wasn't exact. So how did you determine which lawyer was correct? I didn’t, Just said this. I don’t think anything will happen though. Especially now that this happened with your boy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
f8ta1ity54 Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 3 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said: I didn’t, Just said this. I don’t think anything will happen though. So what will you say if he is indicted? The only reason it is taking so long is that trump has been trying to stall and there is no precedent for indicting a former president. 3 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said: Especially now that this happened with your boy. Not my boy. If he broke the law, hold him accountable. I'm not in a personality cult, so it makes it easy for me to say that. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Byrds Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 2 minutes ago, f8ta1ity54 said: So what will you say if he is indicted? The only reason it is taking so long is that trump has been trying to stall and there is no precedent for indicting a former president. Not my boy. If he broke the law, hold him accountable. I'm not in a personality cult, so it makes it easy for me to say that. We will see Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HipKat Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 3 hours ago, Angry Byrds said: It looks even worse that they didn’t care about this VP bs but they go after and ex president for the same shit. So then you should not have a problem if they go after both of them, right? Quote “There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HipKat Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 3 hours ago, f8ta1ity54 said: If he broke the law then I expect the house to investigate, and if guilty he should be held accountable. Of course, though, you cannot indict a sitting president………………. Quote “There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HipKat Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 2 hours ago, Angry Byrds said: I will go ahead and listen to what the attorneys say. But thanks for your input it will be duly noted. You’ll go ahead and listen to what Donald Trump’s attorneys say but you will not go ahead and listen to what the opposing attorney say. Let’s just be clear on that. Quote “There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HipKat Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 2 hours ago, f8ta1ity54 said: But, you said you heard both ways. How did you determine which way to pick? Quote “There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die.” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Angry Byrds Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 33 minutes ago, HipKat said: So then you should not have a problem if they go after both of them, right? I already answered this. Am I not making myself clear or do you just read the parts you want? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly'sFinest Posted January 10 Author Share Posted January 10 (edited) 1 hour ago, Angry Byrds said: I already answered this. Am I not making myself clear or do you just read the parts you want? He only reads what he wants He only hears what he wants He only sees what he wants Actually...he's programmed to operate in that fashion by his media masters that have wiped any semblance of logic and common sense from his memory banks Sad, but true Edited January 10 by Philly'sFinest Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 2 minutes ago, Philly'sFinest said: He only reads what he wants He only hears what he wants He only sees what he wants Actually...he's programmed to operate in that fashion by his media masters that have wiped any semblance of logic and common sense from his memory banks Sad, but true Hey champ tell us more about Parag Agrawal's child pornography arrest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toofast80 Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 Get the impeachments’ started! Biden should have already been removed from office for multiple offenses (or disqualified from holding any public offices) at this point! Get it done “right wingers” 👍 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thebowflexbody Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 HYPOCRITES Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LIBills Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 2 minutes ago, Thebowflexbody said: HYPOCRITES Your font is too small. You need to make it larger so everyone can see. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Angry Byrds Posted January 11 Popular Post Share Posted January 11 40 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said: Hey champ tell us more about Parag Agrawal's child pornography arrest. Can you tell us more about Ted Nugents girlfriends dick. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FanBack Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 4 hours ago, f8ta1ity54 said: So what will you say if he is indicted? The only reason it is taking so long is that trump has been trying to stall and there is no precedent for indicting a former president. Not my boy. If he broke the law, hold him accountable. I'm not in a personality cult, so it makes it easy for me to say that. You have a history of Fascist Subservience. Hence your earned descriptive nickname - FascistalityDeconstructedSwastika. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 6 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said: Can you tell us more about Ted Nugents girlfriends dick. Only that the twig stands alone because the berries have yet to descend. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly'sFinest Posted January 11 Author Share Posted January 11 LOL They always do what they claim the other side does...ALWAYS And FTR, POTUS has the authority to declass...while the VP does not. Also, 45 had his documents under lock and key in his highly secure compound, while Biden had his out on a desk at the University of Penn where the CCP has funded large portions of Bidens think tank. The corruption and fraudulent operations continue...courtesy of our government and the Biden regime 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly'sFinest Posted January 11 Author Share Posted January 11 https://twitter.com/CollinRugg/status/1612632433551355905?t=SvVAX0z4mlm8Kl3BEN6pcA&s=19 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Philly'sFinest Posted January 11 Author Share Posted January 11 Ukraine? You don't say I'm sure this has nothing to do with the billion dollars that then VP Biden threatened to withhold if the Ukranian AG didn't fire the person investigating Burisma...the company that was paying Joe's crackhead son very well as a zero experience top executive. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ICRockets2 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 3 minutes ago, Philly'sFinest said: Ukraine? You don't say I'm sure this has nothing to do with the billion dollars that then VP Biden threatened to withhold if the Ukranian AG didn't fire the person investigating Burisma...the company that was paying Joe's crackhead son very well as a zero experience top executive. You mean the AG dragging his feet on the investigation, that everybody wanted gone? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thebowflexbody Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 ***** Impeach Joe Biden ***** 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.