Jump to content

I am already showing my Zimbabwean Flag on my Twitter Feed. . . .


Herodotus
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yes, right next to my Venezuelan, Ukrainian, Taiwan, and Iranian Flag, I am putting up my Zimbabwean Flag because Zimbabwe is soon going to experience a USAID and National Endowment for Democracy democratization party.  That the "democracy" movement will look like a military coup and will result in a murderous uniparty rule that will make most Zimbabweans long for the latter years of Comrade Bob is incidental.  That the plunder of Zimbabwean resources, plummeting of living standards for the average Zimbabwean, and misery of the Zimbabwean people will soon be worse than ever before is incidental too because soon and very soon we are going to democratize their lithium mines in the same way we have worked to bring liberal democracy to Iraqi, Libyan, Venezuelan and Syrian oil fields, and how we bought liberal democracy to Chilean copper mines and central American banana plantations.  So yes, Zimbabwe we are gonna give you democracy whether you like it or not. . . .  

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/raw-lithium-exports-banned-zimbabwe-151918459.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Herodotus said:

Yes, right next to my Venezuelan, Ukrainian, Taiwan, and Iranian Flag, I am putting up my Zimbabwean Flag because Zimbabwe is soon going to experience a USAID and National Endowment for Democracy democratization party.  That the "democracy" movement will look like a military coup and will result in a murderous uniparty rule that will make most Zimbabweans long for the latter years of Comrade Bob is incidental.  That the plunder of Zimbabwean resources, plummeting of living standards for the average Zimbabwean, and misery of the Zimbabwean people will soon be worse than ever before is incidental too because soon and very soon we are going to democratize their lithium mines in the same way we have worked to bring liberal democracy to Iraqi, Libyan, Venezuelan and Syrian oil fields, and how we bought liberal democracy to Chilean copper mines and central American banana plantations.  So yes, Zimbabwe we are gonna give you democracy whether you like it or not. . . .  

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/raw-lithium-exports-banned-zimbabwe-151918459.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

Nah, the US, UN, etc.. has nothing to do with any type of nation building to create a Global network ready for annexation. These crazy, conspiracy theorists and their bullshit “Globalist” plots🤦‍♂️.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Herodotus said:

We do so repeatedly.  Its our thing.   If you have raw materials and don't yield them up on our terms coups and you are lucky we just fuck around in your elections and deem the guy your people hate as winner.  If not, well you get violent coups, insurgencies and insurrections, assassination attempts (involving anything from poisoning to snipers to car bombs) and other "peaceful democratic protests." If you're really fucked your cities get bombed due to "humanitarian concerns," or your "egregious disregard for human rights." Normally bombing for human rights is coupled with civil wars and sanctions because as Madeline Albright observed, "killing 500,000 [Iraqi children] was well worth the price." So help me, there has to be a hell.  Cunts like her demand it and it must be endlessly worse than anything you or I could imagine.  If you're really fucked and our dicks are hard you get invaded and occupied and we don't leave you until all your cities are in ruins, your combat aged men are dead, and you are in the hands of incompetent and corrupt as all fuck extremists who will get out of the way as we plunder your resources.  Its our thing, its what we do.

It’s not really “our thing”, at least not most decent humans/Americans!  I always refer to it as “them,they” (that’s their pronouns, always has been), so “that’s “their” thing”, to kindly, but as forceful as necessary make us consent to “their” demands.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Herodotus said:

Normally bombing for human rights is coupled with civil wars and sanctions because as Madeline Albright observed, "killing 500,000 [Iraqi children] was well worth the price." So help me, there has to be a hell.  Cunts like her demand it and it must be endlessly worse than anything you or I could imagine.

She died this year.

is she in hell?

you believe in hell.

is she burning in agony right now?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, jc856 said:

She died this year.

is she in hell?

you believe in hell.

is she burning in agony right now?

 

If there's any justice at all in this world her death was painful and whatever is next is infinitely worse.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, Herodotus said:

If there's any justice at all in this world her death was painful and whatever is next is infinitely worse.

Not picking on you gibby, just interested in people that believe that stuff.

and like a lot of people, you get wish-washy* about what you actually think is happening.

I find that irritating about religiosity and religionless in general…

 

 

* aaaaaand then I pick on you🤣 sorry…🫣

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Herodotus said:

If there's any justice at all in this world her death was painful and whatever is next is infinitely worse.

How spiritual of you.  lol

Wait, aren't you supposedly a religious person or am I thinking of someone else?

 

do-you-think-this-republican-would-change-parties-today-full.jpg[/img]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, micknaboz said:

How spiritual of you.  lol

Wait, aren't you supposedly a religious person or am I thinking of someone else?

 

I'm a Catholic of a sort, but yeah when you kill half a million children and say "its well worth it" I have issues with you.  By the way, before you say whataboutism, okay Russia's thing is holding on to its old empire whether they want  to be buds with Moscow or not and fighting proxy wars with us around the globe be it Vietnam or more recently Syria.  Its their schtick.  Am I a fan of it? No.  I am not like Jeffrey Sachs in claiming to be an internationalist, but I am a realist.  I know that great powers, be they Russia, China, or us, or even former imperial powers such as UK and France fight proxy wars and love attempting to preserve their dominance over places that may or may not want to be a part of them anymore.  We saw this in the Falklands.  We see in this Ukraine, Georgia, Kazakhstan, or even their role in the Armenian-Azerbaijan war.  We see this in Syria where we occupy a third of their land, mostly their oil fields and we see this in Africa where France, Belgium, Britain, and Italy very much meddle in the affairs of their former holdings up to the point of being directly involved in coups, regime changes, civil wars and what not.  

 

The thing about being a realist, however, is not accepting the way the world is.  I don't.  I think the exploitation of the great powers needs to stop.  I also thing the great powers need to be a lot more cautious in the borderlands of their near peer rivals.  So Russia and China should stay out of Central and South America, we should stay out of the South China Sea and we should not be trying to exploit and exacerbate Russia's traditional phobias about its western borders as that backs them into a corner where they may fill compelled to do something nuclear.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Herodotus said:

I'm a Catholic of a sort,

 

You mean you're like an Old Testament  Catholic.

See, I seriously rejected that shit in like the 2nd-3rd grade when the nuns would be teaching us how God loves us like his children in one breath  but if we fked up would burn in hell for eternity in the next breath. The disconnect there was just too much for me even as a 2nd grader.

That being said I pretty much wholly embrace most of the teachings of Jesus as outlined in the New Testament.  You know things the Right almost totally rejects, things like charity, forgiving people for their transgressions,feeding the hungry, housing the homeless. 

Wishing a painful death and worse on someone not so much.

 

do-you-think-this-republican-would-change-parties-today-full.jpg[/img]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, micknaboz said:

You mean you're like an Old Testament  Catholic.

See, I seriously rejected that shit in like the 2nd-3rd grade when the nuns would be teaching us how God loves us like his children in one breath  but if we fked up would burn in hell for eternity in the next breath. The disconnect there was just too much for me even as a 2nd grader.

That being said I pretty much wholly embrace most of the teachings of Jesus as outlined in the New Testament.  You know things the Right almost totally rejects, things like charity, forgiving people for their transgressions,feeding the hungry, housing the homeless. 

Wishing a painful death and worse on someone not so much.

 

You are clueless, it's been proven over and over again that Conservatives donate more money to charities than any other group and its not even close. Capitalism has raised more people out of poverty than any other system in the history of the world. Your mistake is thinking that people like yourself that refuse to work deserve other peoples money. As a communist its not surprising that you have disdain for religion-God and those who worship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Republicans do give more, but where that money ends up is not yet clear. One of the study’s authors, Rebecca Nesbit, associate professor of public administration and policy at the University of Georgia, told the New York Times that Republicans prefer to “provide for the collective good through private institutions. But we don’t know what type of institutions they’re giving to.” It also wasn’t obvious “whether donors were being purely generous or whether they would also benefit from their donation. This relationship is called consumption philanthropy, in which people give to a religious organization or a school from which they will derive a benefit in the form of, say, a better religious education program or a new gymnasium.” Giving to a food bank or a homeless shelter has a very different outcome than does giving to a private school."

And at least for politicians the left is far more charitable than the right who inevitably rail against and oppose health care, raising the min wage, increases in food stamps and innumerable social programs.

do-you-think-this-republican-would-change-parties-today-full.jpg[/img]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Very Wide Right said:

You are clueless, it's been proven over and over again that Conservatives donate more money to charities than any other group and its not even close. Capitalism has raised more people out of poverty than any other system in the history of the world. Your mistake is thinking that people like yourself that refuse to work deserve other peoples money. As a communist its not surprising that you have disdain for religion-God and those who worship.

That’s weird. I looked for that proof and I can’t find it.

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...