Good job guys

[RichJ]

1 hour ago, shiva2999 said:

I was already a super genius at 10 years old.

I was tested by the school system at the end of grade two, scored 159 IQ, was taken out of normal school, put in the Etobicoke Advancement Classes and did grades 3, 4 and 5 in two years.

So sue me.

wow impressive . And yet you became a camera man for B movies that wont make it to youtube even for free ? 

[jc856]

1 hour ago, Herodotus said:

IF there is biblical prophecy at play then the US is the great satan.  You have orthodox killing Orthodox, you have Catholic popes being slandered for calling for peace.  You have Euros and gay American politicians from Maryland saying "to deputinize Europe we need to dechristianize it."  So guess who has the spirit of antichrist here.

 

I’m not sure if you answered my question.

you’re a little wishy -washy wiff dat answer imho

[LiterateStylish]

2 hours ago, shiva2999 said:

As someone who decided he was an atheist at 10 years old, my opinion is nothing in this situation has anything to do with biblical prophesy.

I would question anything I decided at only 10 years old.

[Herodotus]

5 hours ago, LiterateStylish said:

Okay, lets use your numbers.

 

I don't deny there are some Ukranian Nazi's. 

I deny that the 2,000 or so Ukranian Nazi's warrant a war that have killed over 6,400 civilians and more than 70,000 total casualties. 

 

Just gonna leave this here.  It may be beyond your intellect to grasp it:

 

[ICRockets2]

1 minute ago, Herodotus said:

Just gonna leave this here.  It may be beyond your intellect to grasp it:

 

I already explained why countries voted no on that

[LiterateStylish]

5 minutes ago, Herodotus said:

Just gonna leave this here.  It may be beyond your intellect to grasp it:

 

What does it feel like to have Putin controlling you like a puppet?

”The United States once again expresses concern and opposition to this resolution, a document most notable for its thinly veiled attempts to legitimize longstanding Russian disinformation narratives smearing neighboring nations under the cynical guise of halting Nazi glorification.”

[deleted]

PERSPECTIVE!!  WE ARE ARGUING ABOUT A WAR ACROSS THE GLOBE.

STFU AND GET YOUR ASS TO A JOSH ALLEN ELBOW PRAYER VIGIL. 

GEORGE WASHINGTON WARNED US ABOUT FOREIGN ENTANGLEMENTS.   IF HE WERE ALIVE TODAY, HE'D GIVE HIS SET OF WOODEN TEETH TO HEAL JOSH ALLEN'S ELBOW!!

[Herodotus]

30 minutes ago, LiterateStylish said:

What does it feel like to have Putin controlling you like a puppet?

”The United States once again expresses concern and opposition to this resolution, a document most notable for its thinly veiled attempts to legitimize longstanding Russian disinformation narratives smearing neighboring nations under the cynical guise of halting Nazi glorification.”

Yeah and the Azov btn visited US public schools.  This country has been so propagandized that it literally  thinks its a force for good

[ICRockets2]

23 minutes ago, Herodotus said:

Yeah and the Azov btn visited US public schools. 

I can't find a source for this, so I assume you have one?

[Thebowflexbody]

Ukraine is not on my top 10 list of important things.  Don't you dare call me a Russia lover.  This is another ENDLESS WAR for no real reason.  Wake up.

[Herodotus]

7 minutes ago, Thebowflexbody said:

Ukraine is not on my top 10 list of important things.  Don't you dare call me a Russia lover.  This is another ENDLESS WAR for no real reason.  Wake up.

Oh there's a reason for it, hundreds of billions in money to be laundered, guns to be ran through Ukraine to start shit in Iran, and keep all sorts of wars and terrorist actions going, and an excuse to crack down on dissent.   Its a very nice scam.

[shiva2999]

5 hours ago, RichJ said:

wow impressive . And yet you became a camera man for B movies that wont make it to youtube even for free ? 

If you're interested, this was what I did...

https://www.beyondfilmschool.com/whats-a-1st-assistant-director/

[shiva2999]

36 minutes ago, Herodotus said:

Oh there's a reason for it, hundreds of billions in money to be laundered, guns to be ran through Ukraine to start shit in Iran, and keep all sorts of wars and terrorist actions going, and an excuse to crack down on dissent.   Its a very nice scam.

People have such short memories.

In my 20+ years doing this, the US has waged 3 major wars of aggression in Afghanistan, Iraq and Libya and ALL HAD MAJORITY SUPPORT FROM BOTH PARTIES AND THE COUNTRY BECAUSE YOU WERE MORE VIRTUOUS THAN THE EVIL AYE-RABS.

Plus a bunch of other shit.

All disasters and crimes against humanity.

Not to mention all the other crappy shit you've done in so many other places.

Now the same fucking scenario, except way stupider and more dangerous.

But are Americans worried? Fuck no.

After all, if we all go up in the smoke of a thousand nukes, Americans won't care because they ALL KNOW THEY'RE GOING TO GO TO HEAVEN BECAUSE GOD LOVES THEM BEST.

Assholes...

[ICRockets2]

55 minutes ago, shiva2999 said:

 

In my 20+ years doing this, the US has waged 3 major wars of aggression

 

Now the same fucking scenario, except 

 

except not even close, because the United States did not invade another country this time thereby making it definitionally NOT a war of aggression.  

[shiva2999]

12 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

except not even close, because the United States did not invade another country this time thereby making it definitionally NOT a war of aggression.  

If you pay someone else to try to kill a third party, that still makes YOU  the aggressor, even if the intended target takes out your hit man first.

[ICRockets2]

17 minutes ago, shiva2999 said:

If you pay someone else to try to kill a third party, that still makes YOU  the aggressor, even if the intended target takes out your hit man first.

I'm too high to argue whether I grant that premise, but I don't grant the implied premise that what you're saying describes the dynamic at play in Ukraine.

[shiva2999]

13 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

I'm too high to argue whether I grant that premise, but I don't grant the implied premise that what you're saying describes the dynamic at play in Ukraine.

Of course you don't grant it because it makes you look silly and disingenuous.

Which is what you do when you deliberately ignore context.

[ICRockets2]

26 minutes ago, shiva2999 said:

Of course you don't grant it because it makes you look silly and disingenuous.

Which is what you do when you deliberately ignore context.

No, I don't grant the premise because it's absurd to believe Ukraine was a threat to invade Russia.

[shiva2999]

5 hours ago, ICRockets2 said:

No, I don't grant the premise because it's absurd to believe Ukraine was a threat to invade Russia.

Did I say it was?

So what?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Napoleon_complex

The "Napoleon complex", known informally as small man syndrome, is a syndrome normally attributed to people of small stature. It is characterized by overly-aggressive or domineering social behavior, such as lying about earnings, and carries the implication that such behavior is compensatory for the subject's physical or social shortcomings. In psychology, the Napoleon complex is regarded as a derogatory social stereotype.^[1]

 

[ICRockets2]

10 minutes ago, shiva2999 said:

Did I say it was?

 

 

Yes.

[shiva2999]

27 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

Yes.

Then it should be easy for you to post the damning text.

Until then, here's the latest from someone your previous persona admired.

https://caitlinjohnstone.com/2022/11/07/lets-be-clear-if-ww3-happens-it-will-be-the-result-of-choices-made-by-the-us-empire/

 

 

HomeArticleLet’s Be Clear: If WW3 Happens It Will Be The Result Of Choices Made By The US Empire

 

NOVEMBER 7, 2022

Let’s Be Clear: If WW3 Happens It Will Be The Result Of Choices Made By The US Empire

•  

 

The commander of the US nuclear arsenal has stated unequivocally that the war in Ukraine is just a warmup exercise for a much larger conflict that’s already in the mail.

Antiwar’s Dave DeCamp reports:

The commander that oversees US nuclear forces delivered an ominous warning at a naval conference last week by calling the war in Ukraine a “warmup” for the “big one” that is to come.

 

“This Ukraine crisis that we’re in right now, this is just the warmup,” said Navy Adm. Charles Richard, the commander of US Strategic command. “The big one is coming. And it isn’t going to be very long before we’re going to get tested in ways that we haven’t been tested [in] a long time.”

 

Richard’s warning came after the US released its new Nuclear Posture Review (NPR), which reaffirms that the US doctrine allows for the first use of nuclear weapons. The review says that the purpose of the US nuclear arsenal is to “deter strategic attacks, assure allies and partners, and achieve US objectives if deterrence fails.”

Not only does Richard appear to believe that a hot war between major world powers is a foregone conclusion, he has also previously stated that a nuclear war with Russia or China is now “a very real possibility.”

Again, this is not some armchair warrior opining from his desk at a corporate newspaper or DC think tank, this is the head of STRATCOM. Richard would be personally overseeing the very warfare he is talking about.

What I find most striking about remarks like these is how passive they always make it sound. Richard talks about “The Big One” like other people talk about California earthquakes, as though a hot war with China would be some kind of natural disaster that just happened out of nowhere.

This type of rhetoric is becoming more and more common. Describing an Atomic Age world war as something that would happen to the US empire, rather than the direct result of concrete A-or-B decisions made by the empire, is becoming its own genre of foreign policy punditry.

This passive, oopsy-poopsy narrative overlay that’s placed atop the US empire’s militarism is nothing new. Back in 2017 Fair.org’s Adam Johnson documented the way western media are always describing the United States as “stumbling” into wars and getting “sucked in” to military interventions, like a cheating spouse making up bad excuses after getting caught:

This framing serves to flatter two sensibilities: one right and one vaguely left. It satisfies the right-wing nationalist idea that America only goes to war because it’s compelled to by forces outside of its own control; the reluctant warrior, the gentle giant who will only attack when provoked to do so. But it also plays to a nominally liberal, hipster notion that the US military is actually incompetent and boobish, and is generally bad at war-making.

This is expressed most clearly in the idea that the US is “drawn into” war despite its otherwise unwarlike intentions. “Will US Be Drawn Further Into Syrian Civil War?” asked Fox News (4/7/17). “How America Could Stumble Into War With Iran,” disclosed The Atlantic (2/9/17), “What It Would Take to Pull the US Into a War in Asia,” speculated Quartz (4/29/17). “Trump could easily get us sucked into Afghanistan again,” Slate predicted (5/11/17). The US is “stumbling into a wider war” in Syria, the New York Times editorial board (5/2/15) warned. “A Flexing Contest in Syria May Trap the US in an Endless Conflict,” Vice News (6/19/17) added.

...more...

 

 

[ICRockets2]

3 minutes ago, shiva2999 said:

Then it should be easy for you to post the damning text.

 

 

"If you pay someone else to try to kill a third party,"

 

If the US is, in your mind, paying Ukraine to kill Russia then they are clearly considered a threat to invade Russia in your mind.  The only way this could not be the case is if you also believe the US is cartoonishly inept at imperialism, but if you think that's a credible read on the situation then there's no rational justification for Russia's invasion.  

So either you believe Ukraine was a threat to invade Russia and that threat was why Russia invaded first, or you do not believe Ukraine was a threat to invade Russia in which case Russia's invasion of Ukraine was an overt and unjustifiable act of aggression.  

There is no alternative to these two options.

[shiva2999]

5 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

 

"If you pay someone else to try to kill a third party,"

 

 

Sorry, but that doesn't say what you claim it does.

Read it again and try to actually understand what I'm saying rather than something you wish I'd said.

[ICRockets2]

1 minute ago, shiva2999 said:

Sorry, but that doesn't say what you claim it does.

 

Yes it does.

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7870768-never-believe-that-anti-semites-are-completely-unaware-of-the-absurdity

[shiva2999]

15 minutes ago, ICRockets2 said:

Yes it does.

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/7870768-never-believe-that-anti-semites-are-completely-unaware-of-the-absurdity

Again you refuse to explain yourself and double down by claiming I hate Jews.

Pathetic.