Jump to content

45% of Americans Say U.S. Should Be a ‘Christian Nation’


f8ta1ity54
 Share

Recommended Posts

Mercuns say a lot of stupid shit.  In 2003 72 percent of people in Dumfuckistan supported invading Iraq.  Not too be outdone in their own stupidity, almost 75 percent of Dumbfuckistanis support giving Nazis guns and money to Ukraine.  40 percent of the fucktards in Dumbfuckistan believe in special creation and 10 to 15 percent of those think the world was created on a Thursday in April 6500 years ago.  Two percent believe the earth is flat.  10 percent believe the moon landing was a hoax (down from an alarming 30 percent in 69).  53 percent of Dumbfuckistanis believe America is the greatest country ever. 67.3 percent of all dumbfuckistanis believe in capital punishment, over half of dumbfuckistanis support using nuclear weaponry.  60 percent of Dumbfuckistanis believe Russia meddled in the 2016 election, Over 40 percent of Dumbfuckistanis think Biden "stole" the 2020 election.  We won't even talk vaccines, I am not even going to talk covid vaccines, I am talking about childhood vaccines.  Two things should scare the shit out of you in this:

1. Most of these dumbfuckistanis are eligible to vote which means in theory at least they get to elect our policy makers
2. The Dumbfuckistanis have 8000 nuclear weapons, spend (with no audit or oversight) between 500 bill and a trillion dollars on offense every year and have done so at that rate since 2000.  

If that doesn't make you say Oh Fuck, we're doomed I don't know what does.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Philly'sFinest said:

Atheists and those that want to sexualize education for children are upset by this

Having the lord in your life is a good thing

Most people that do are good hearted and kind.

Those that don't are much more likely to be influenced by hatred and evil.

 

 

What a load of shit!     Take your American Taliban and stick it up your ass.

  • Like 2
do-you-think-this-republican-would-change-parties-today-full.jpg[/img]
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, foster said:

At least the founding fathers knew enough to prescribe the separation of church and state. 
 

 

I love when people say this and they don’t understand the true meaning of separation of church and state. It doesn’t mean that the country can’t have a religion, it means you have the freedom of religion without persecution. 
 

 

'Separation of church and state' metaphor rooted in early American fears of government involvement

Roger Williams, founder of Rhode Island, was the first public official to use this metaphor. He opined that an authentic Christian church would be possible only if there was “a wall or hedge of separation” between the “wilderness of the world” and “the garden of the church.” Williams believed that any government involvement in the church would corrupt the church.
 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, RichJ said:

F8 is so scared of Chrisitans. Must be the devil in him. 

He hates them, but they probably do more to help the people he is fighting for than the people he is electing into office. Crazy how that works, huh? Maybe he really doesn’t care for those people, maybe it’s just politics for him. Damn Christians feed the and housing homeless, fostering children, helping single mothers in need.

  • Like 2

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Philly'sFinest said:

Atheists and those that want to sexualize education for children are upset by this

Atheists are on the same level as those who want to sexualize children? lmao

10 hours ago, Philly'sFinest said:

Having the lord in your life is a good thing

Which one?

10 hours ago, Philly'sFinest said:

Most people that do are good hearted and kind.

like some good Christian nationalists who believe that LGBTQ people should be executed?

10 hours ago, Philly'sFinest said:

Those that don't are much more likely to be influenced by hatred and evil.

citation?

  • Like 1

81Yi-LuxR2L._SY355_.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Angry Byrds said:

He hates them, but they probably do more to help the people he is fighting for than the people he is electing into office. Crazy how that works, huh? Maybe he really doesn’t care for those people, maybe it’s just politics for him. Damn Christians feed the and housing homeless, fostering children, helping single mothers in need.

I hate religious extremists of all faiths. Evangelical Christians just happen to be the dominant religious group in the country. The people I want to elect to office have plans to combat wealth inequality and homelessness. The GOP doesn't give two fucks about either of those things.

  • Like 1

81Yi-LuxR2L._SY355_.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, f8ta1ity54 said:

I hate religious extremists of all faiths. Evangelical Christians just happen to be the dominant religious group in the country. The people I want to elect to office have plans to combat wealth inequality and homelessness. The GOP doesn't give two fucks about either of those things.

Sure they do. Why haven’t they helped homeless in their democrat ran cities. Why does parts of California, New Orleans a and Portland look like a 3rd world country. Yet the Church’s in those cities are doing more than the politicians 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Angry Byrds said:

I love when people say this and they don’t understand the true meaning of separation of church and state. It doesn’t mean that the country can’t have a religion, it means you have the freedom of religion without persecution. 
 

 

'Separation of church and state' metaphor rooted in early American fears of government involvement

Roger Williams, founder of Rhode Island, was the first public official to use this metaphor. He opined that an authentic Christian church would be possible only if there was “a wall or hedge of separation” between the “wilderness of the world” and “the garden of the church.” Williams believed that any government involvement in the church would corrupt the church.
 

 

 

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Seems pretty clear to me in the establishment clause of the 1st amendment that the government is not to establish a national religion. The government is not supposed to sponsor any one religion over another.

  • Like 1

81Yi-LuxR2L._SY355_.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45% of Americans it is not a majority. What is the percentage of Republicans that think they should be a Christian nation? 90%? Proving once again that Republicans are in the minority voice in this country

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Angry Byrds said:

Sure they do. Why haven’t they helped homeless in their democrat ran cities. Why does parts of California, New Orleans a and Portland look like a 3rd world country. Yet the Church’s in those cities are doing more than the politicians 

So why haven't the churches ended homelessness in this country?

81Yi-LuxR2L._SY355_.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, f8ta1ity54 said:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Seems pretty clear to me in the establishment clause of the 1st amendment that the government is not to establish a national religion. The government is not supposed to sponsor any one religion over another.

Yeah, you’ve posted this before. It means that the government can’t make law preventing you from religious right. You don’t read so well. 
 

Respecting the establishment of religion or preventing free exercise thereof.

it’s exactly what I just said. They can’t tell you who to worship. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Angry Byrds said:

Yeah, you’ve posted this before. It means that the government can’t make law preventing you from religious right. You don’t read so well. 
 

Respecting the establishment of religion or preventing free exercise thereof.

it’s exactly what I just said. They can’t tell you who to worship. 

The government cannot sponsor a religion. That means, the government cannot say "we are now a Christian nation". What part of that do you not understand?

81Yi-LuxR2L._SY355_.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...