Four Big Questions For Election Fraud Deniers

[SackMan518]

"Most secure election in history" people you're up to bat!

Four Big Questions For Election Fraud Deniers
The same Democrats who appeared in HBO's "Kill Chain" now tell you that "2000 Mules" is a hoax!

QUESTION #1: Why do Democrats continue to insist that election fraud does not exist — and that such “baseless claims” have been “debunked” — when prominent Democrats insisted (in 2017 and 2018 and 2019 and 2020) that election fraud does exist and it’s a very big problem?

 

Did they all forget that we live in the age of video playback?

Did they all suffer from simultaneous amnesia about the hearings they held, the expert witnesses they gathered, and the interviews they gave (for documentaries like HBO’s “Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Elections”) during the Trump Administration?

 

Thank you Kamala Harris! Thank you Amy Klobuchar! Thank you Ron Wyden! Thank you Mark Warner! Thank you Stacey Abrams!

Thank you, HBO! Thank you, New York Times! Thank you, NBC News! Thank you, Atlanta Journal-Constitution! Thank you, CNN! Thank you, PBS!

Thank you all for being election deniers before you became election fraud deniers!

QUESTION #2: Why were 78 million American votes from 800 counties in seven states sent overseas to be “handled” by a bankrupt Spanish company in Barcelona called SCYTL in 2020? Why is SCYTL’s biggest customer the Department of Defense? Why would the Department of Defense subcontract the “processing” of 78 million American votes to a foreign company?

For that matter, why is the Department of Defense involved in our elections at all?

 

QUESTION #3: Why did the Associated Press just publish an article that admitted Dominion voting machines are vulnerable to hacking — and must be fixed immediately with software patches in 16 states? Why did the federal government’s own cybersecurity agency (CISA) send out a bulletin to state election officials on June 3rd that warned them about nine security vulnerabilities that must be addressed?

From the AP article:

ATLANTA (AP) — Electronic voting machines from a leading vendor used in at least 16 states have software vulnerabilities that leave them susceptible to hacking if unaddressed, the nation’s leading cybersecurity agency says in an advisory sent to state election officials.

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, or CISA, said there is no evidence the flaws in the Dominion Voting Systems’ equipment have been exploited to alter election results. The advisory is based on testing by a prominent computer scientist and expert witness in a long-running lawsuit that is unrelated to false allegations of a stolen election pushed by former President Donald Trump after his 2020 election loss.

The advisory, obtained by The Associated Press in advance of its expected Friday release, details nine vulnerabilities and suggests protective measures to prevent or detect their exploitation. Amid a swirl of misinformation and disinformation about elections, CISA seems to be trying to walk a line between not alarming the public and stressing the need for election officials to take action.

Didn’t the Associated Press (and all the rest of the corrupt corporate media) spend the last 18 months telling the world that anyone who questioned the security of our elections was a conspiracy theorist?

QUESTION #4: Why has a federal judge in Georgia refused to release a report by a cybersecurity expert who inspected Dominion voting machines and found them vulnerable to hacking and manipulation?

Why is Judge Amy Totenberg opposed to the public release of J. Alex Halderman’s special report regarding the vulnerability of electronic voting machines?

 

Why has Judge Totenberg denied a request by the Louisiana secretary of state to review the special report? (Louisiana uses Dominion voting machines as well.) Why has Judge Totenberg denied access to the Halderman report to media outlets as well?

Media outlets such as Fox News and One America News (OAN) are currently being sued for defamation by Dominion — and a federal judge is refusing to release a report that reportedly shows the Dominion machines are not secure?

Think about it.

 

 

[Woody]

[SackMan518]

1 minute ago, Woody said:

Dave Van Zandt is ON the case!

[HipKat]

6 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

"Most secure election in history" people you're up to bat!

Four Big Questions For Election Fraud Deniers
The same Democrats who appeared in HBO's "Kill Chain" now tell you that "2000 Mules" is a hoax!

QUESTION #1: Why do Democrats continue to insist that election fraud does not exist — and that such “baseless claims” have been “debunked” — when prominent Democrats insisted (in 2017 and 2018 and 2019 and 2020) that election fraud does exist and it’s a very big problem?

 

Did they all forget that we live in the age of video playback?

Did they all suffer from simultaneous amnesia about the hearings they held, the expert witnesses they gathered, and the interviews they gave (for documentaries like HBO’s “Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Elections”) during the Trump Administration?

 

Thank you Kamala Harris! Thank you Amy Klobuchar! Thank you Ron Wyden! Thank you Mark Warner! Thank you Stacey Abrams!

Thank you, HBO! Thank you, New York Times! Thank you, NBC News! Thank you, Atlanta Journal-Constitution! Thank you, CNN! Thank you, PBS!

Thank you all for being election deniers before you became election fraud deniers!

 

6 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

QUESTION #2: Why were 78 million American votes from 800 counties in seven states sent overseas to be “handled” by a bankrupt Spanish company in Barcelona called SCYTL in 2020? Why is SCYTL’s biggest customer the Department of Defense? Why would the Department of Defense subcontract the “processing” of 78 million American votes to a foreign company?

For that matter, why is the Department of Defense involved in our elections at all?

Weird how the ONLY place this shows up in a search is the site you're sourcing here

78 million American votes from 800 counties in seven states sent overseas to be “handled” by a bankrupt Spanish company in Barcelona called SCYTL in 2020?

6 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

 

QUESTION #3: Why did the Associated Press just publish an article that admitted Dominion voting machines are vulnerable to hacking — and must be fixed immediately with software patches in 16 states? Why did the federal government’s own cybersecurity agency (CISA) send out a bulletin to state election officials on June 3rd that warned them about nine security vulnerabilities that must be addressed?

From the AP article:

ATLANTA (AP) — Electronic voting machines from a leading vendor used in at least 16 states have software vulnerabilities that leave them susceptible to hacking if unaddressed, the nation’s leading cybersecurity agency says in an advisory sent to state election officials.

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, or CISA, said there is no evidence the flaws in the Dominion Voting Systems’ equipment have been exploited to alter election results. The advisory is based on testing by a prominent computer scientist and expert witness in a long-running lawsuit that is unrelated to false allegations of a stolen election pushed by former President Donald Trump after his 2020 election loss.

The advisory, obtained by The Associated Press in advance of its expected Friday release, details nine vulnerabilities and suggests protective measures to prevent or detect their exploitation. Amid a swirl of misinformation and disinformation about elections, CISA seems to be trying to walk a line between not alarming the public and stressing the need for election officials to take action.

 

Weird how the article you used debunks your claim

6 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

QUESTION #4: Why has a federal judge in Georgia refused to release a report by a cybersecurity expert who inspected Dominion voting machines and found them vulnerable to hacking and manipulation?

Why is Judge Amy Totenberg opposed to the public release of J. Alex Halderman’s special report regarding the vulnerability of electronic voting machines?

 

Why has Judge Totenberg denied a request by the Louisiana secretary of state to review the special report? (Louisiana uses Dominion voting machines as well.) Why has Judge Totenberg denied access to the Halderman report to media outlets as well?

Media outlets such as Fox News and One America News (OAN) are currently being sued for defamation by Dominion — and a federal judge is refusing to release a report that reportedly shows the Dominion machines are not secure?

Think about it.

Ummm, ok. Looks like she was right 

 

U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg was always worried that bad-faith actors would exploit a cybersecurity researcher’s report on voting machine vulnerabilities to cast doubt on the 2020 election. MyPillow magnate Mike Lindell is here to prove her right.

On Saturday, Lindell and his attorneys demanded a copy of the voting machine analysis that purports to show how a certain kind of Dominion ballot machine can be hacked. While that report was authored by a renowned computer security expert who merely posits that theoretical flaws should be fixed for future elections, Lindell appears to see this as an opportunity to bolster his bogus assertions that the 2020 presidential election was rigged.

When Judge Totenberg took the rare step of sealing this expert report back in July, she did so out of concern that its release would fuel conspiracy theories. Totenberg refused to entertain ideas about releasing it to the public, saying she was “at the end of my rope about that.”

 

 

[Thebowflexbody]

6 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

"Most secure election in history" people you're up to bat!

Four Big Questions For Election Fraud Deniers
The same Democrats who appeared in HBO's "Kill Chain" now tell you that "2000 Mules" is a hoax!

QUESTION #1: Why do Democrats continue to insist that election fraud does not exist — and that such “baseless claims” have been “debunked” — when prominent Democrats insisted (in 2017 and 2018 and 2019 and 2020) that election fraud does exist and it’s a very big problem?

 

Did they all forget that we live in the age of video playback?

Did they all suffer from simultaneous amnesia about the hearings they held, the expert witnesses they gathered, and the interviews they gave (for documentaries like HBO’s “Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Elections”) during the Trump Administration?

 

Thank you Kamala Harris! Thank you Amy Klobuchar! Thank you Ron Wyden! Thank you Mark Warner! Thank you Stacey Abrams!

Thank you, HBO! Thank you, New York Times! Thank you, NBC News! Thank you, Atlanta Journal-Constitution! Thank you, CNN! Thank you, PBS!

Thank you all for being election deniers before you became election fraud deniers!

QUESTION #2: Why were 78 million American votes from 800 counties in seven states sent overseas to be “handled” by a bankrupt Spanish company in Barcelona called SCYTL in 2020? Why is SCYTL’s biggest customer the Department of Defense? Why would the Department of Defense subcontract the “processing” of 78 million American votes to a foreign company?

For that matter, why is the Department of Defense involved in our elections at all?

 

QUESTION #3: Why did the Associated Press just publish an article that admitted Dominion voting machines are vulnerable to hacking — and must be fixed immediately with software patches in 16 states? Why did the federal government’s own cybersecurity agency (CISA) send out a bulletin to state election officials on June 3rd that warned them about nine security vulnerabilities that must be addressed?

From the AP article:

ATLANTA (AP) — Electronic voting machines from a leading vendor used in at least 16 states have software vulnerabilities that leave them susceptible to hacking if unaddressed, the nation’s leading cybersecurity agency says in an advisory sent to state election officials.

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, or CISA, said there is no evidence the flaws in the Dominion Voting Systems’ equipment have been exploited to alter election results. The advisory is based on testing by a prominent computer scientist and expert witness in a long-running lawsuit that is unrelated to false allegations of a stolen election pushed by former President Donald Trump after his 2020 election loss.

The advisory, obtained by The Associated Press in advance of its expected Friday release, details nine vulnerabilities and suggests protective measures to prevent or detect their exploitation. Amid a swirl of misinformation and disinformation about elections, CISA seems to be trying to walk a line between not alarming the public and stressing the need for election officials to take action.

Didn’t the Associated Press (and all the rest of the corrupt corporate media) spend the last 18 months telling the world that anyone who questioned the security of our elections was a conspiracy theorist?

QUESTION #4: Why has a federal judge in Georgia refused to release a report by a cybersecurity expert who inspected Dominion voting machines and found them vulnerable to hacking and manipulation?

Why is Judge Amy Totenberg opposed to the public release of J. Alex Halderman’s special report regarding the vulnerability of electronic voting machines?

 

Why has Judge Totenberg denied a request by the Louisiana secretary of state to review the special report? (Louisiana uses Dominion voting machines as well.) Why has Judge Totenberg denied access to the Halderman report to media outlets as well?

Media outlets such as Fox News and One America News (OAN) are currently being sued for defamation by Dominion — and a federal judge is refusing to release a report that reportedly shows the Dominion machines are not secure?

Think about it.

 

 

Hear hear

[Philly'sFinest]

They're beyond any type of critical thought or ability to go against their current train of thought. 

It's mostly because of TDS, which is another form of programming that they fell for before any of this.

I can only imagine if the outcomes were reversed, and we had the vote counting stop in all the battleground states when Biden was up only to see each and every one go the other way around 3 or 4 the next morning. I can only imagine the outrage over mass mail in ballots. I can only imagine the chaos and destruction Dems would have unleashed if it wasn't fully investigated.

But since it was that bad, bad, orange man...it was simply the most secure election ever (total lie), and it is not to be questioned whatsoever. 

 

[SackMan518]

43 minutes ago, HipKat said:

Weird how the article you used debunks your claim

"Thanks for believing in me Hip!" - Love Hills

[thinwhiteduke]

Lol 

Did you really have to use, election fraud "deniers?

I'm sick of the ter.

 

[HipKat]

50 minutes ago, SackMan518 said:

 

"Thanks for believing in me Hip!" - Love Hills

Ummmm, OK, whatever, you still debunked your own claim in the article you posted

[SackMan518]

18 minutes ago, HipKat said:

Ummmm, OK, whatever, you still debunked your own claim in the article you posted

The article did no such thing and then there's this about SCYTL:

 

[HipKat]

8 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

The article did no such thing and then there's this about SCYTL:

 

The SCYTL thing is only being reported on a very small handful of far right wing, conspiracy theory sites, like the one you used, and OAN, here. It's a bullshit non-existent Right wing lie, just like all the other lies that have been explained and debunked, but your side refuses to accept because you WANT there to be this big conspiracy - where none exists. It's not even reported by more mainstream Right Wing outlets. 

As for the article that you posted, read the parts in bold print. Your whole theory is based on "What if..."

 

Electronic voting machines from a leading vendor used in at least 16 states have software vulnerabilities that leave them susceptible to hacking if unaddressed, the nation’s leading cybersecurity agency says in an advisory sent to state election officials.

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, or CISA, said there is no evidence the flaws in the Dominion Voting Systems’ equipment have been exploited to alter election results. 

 

[SackMan518]

4 hours ago, HipKat said:

The SCYTL thing is only being reported on a very small handful of far right wing, conspiracy theory sites, like the one you used, and OAN, here. It's a bullshit non-existent Right wing lie, just like all the other lies that have been explained and debunked, but your side refuses to accept because you WANT there to be this big conspiracy - where none exists. It's not even reported by more mainstream Right Wing outlets. 

As for the article that you posted, read the parts in bold print. Your whole theory is based on "What if..."

 

Electronic voting machines from a leading vendor used in at least 16 states have software vulnerabilities that leave them susceptible to hacking if unaddressed, the nation’s leading cybersecurity agency says in an advisory sent to state election officials.

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, or CISA, said there is no evidence the flaws in the Dominion Voting Systems’ equipment have been exploited to alter election results. 

 

Seriously? You are a prime chef of the Weak Sauce replies.

21 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

Electronic voting machines from a leading vendor used in at least 16 states have software vulnerabilities that leave them susceptible to hacking if unaddressed, the nation’s leading cybersecurity agency says in an advisory sent to state election officials.

What this sentence means is that there are numerous vulnerabilities that IF UNADRESSED lead to faulty results. That means if they're not fixed then there's no reason to trust the machines. Did you ever take a course in grammar?

21 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, or CISA, said there is no evidence the flaws in the Dominion Voting Systems’ equipment have been exploited to alter election results.

That's what CISA said but analysis by other sources doubts this claim and remember that the CISA head Christopher Krebs claimed that it was "the most secure election in history" before he was fired. He then joined with former Facebook employee Alex Stamos to form his own cybersecurity company which then took on shady software company SolarWinds as its first client. Oh, also Krebs said this:

So he admitted that election security was never his job and only passed on info pertaining to dead voters which doesn't seem to be the focus with the mounds of printed ballots stuffed in drop boxes (with no chain of custody by the way) and algorithmic shenanigans by the machines all of which gave Biden a mathematically highly improbable bump in the dead of night. 

[HipKat]

1 hour ago, SackMan518 said:

Seriously? You are a prime chef of the Weak Sauce replies.

What this sentence means is that there are numerous vulnerabilities that IF UNADRESSED lead to faulty results. That means if they're not fixed then there's no reason to trust the machines. Did you ever take a course in grammar?

That’s very cute how you’re trying to move the goal posts, but you’re missing out on my point. You originally made it look like these vulnerabilities had been exploited. I pointed out they have not been exploited as it clearly says in the article that you used. Now all of a sudden you’re moving the goalposts I repeating the same thing I said.
 

Are you getting confused? It seems like you’re getting confused.

1 hour ago, SackMan518 said:

That's what CISA said but analysis by other sources doubts this claim and remember that the CISA head Christopher Krebs claimed that it was "the most secure election in history" before he was fired. He then joined with former Facebook employee Alex Stamos to form his own cybersecurity company which then took on shady software company SolarWinds as its first client. 

None of that really matters about Anything. Bottom line is that no matter how deep you dig, no matter how many false flags you pull up, none of this is evidence of a stolen election. It’s all innuendo, rhetoric and baseless accusations without merit.

[deleted]

23 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

"Most secure election in history" people you're up to bat!

Four Big Questions For Election Fraud Deniers
The same Democrats who appeared in HBO's "Kill Chain" now tell you that "2000 Mules" is a hoax!

QUESTION #1: Why do Democrats continue to insist that election fraud does not exist — and that such “baseless claims” have been “debunked” — when prominent Democrats insisted (in 2017 and 2018 and 2019 and 2020) that election fraud does exist and it’s a very big problem?

 

Did they all forget that we live in the age of video playback?

Did they all suffer from simultaneous amnesia about the hearings they held, the expert witnesses they gathered, and the interviews they gave (for documentaries like HBO’s “Kill Chain: The Cyber War on America’s Elections”) during the Trump Administration?

 

Thank you Kamala Harris! Thank you Amy Klobuchar! Thank you Ron Wyden! Thank you Mark Warner! Thank you Stacey Abrams!

Thank you, HBO! Thank you, New York Times! Thank you, NBC News! Thank you, Atlanta Journal-Constitution! Thank you, CNN! Thank you, PBS!

Thank you all for being election deniers before you became election fraud deniers!

QUESTION #2: Why were 78 million American votes from 800 counties in seven states sent overseas to be “handled” by a bankrupt Spanish company in Barcelona called SCYTL in 2020? Why is SCYTL’s biggest customer the Department of Defense? Why would the Department of Defense subcontract the “processing” of 78 million American votes to a foreign company?

For that matter, why is the Department of Defense involved in our elections at all?

 

QUESTION #3: Why did the Associated Press just publish an article that admitted Dominion voting machines are vulnerable to hacking — and must be fixed immediately with software patches in 16 states? Why did the federal government’s own cybersecurity agency (CISA) send out a bulletin to state election officials on June 3rd that warned them about nine security vulnerabilities that must be addressed?

From the AP article:

ATLANTA (AP) — Electronic voting machines from a leading vendor used in at least 16 states have software vulnerabilities that leave them susceptible to hacking if unaddressed, the nation’s leading cybersecurity agency says in an advisory sent to state election officials.

The U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Agency, or CISA, said there is no evidence the flaws in the Dominion Voting Systems’ equipment have been exploited to alter election results. The advisory is based on testing by a prominent computer scientist and expert witness in a long-running lawsuit that is unrelated to false allegations of a stolen election pushed by former President Donald Trump after his 2020 election loss.

The advisory, obtained by The Associated Press in advance of its expected Friday release, details nine vulnerabilities and suggests protective measures to prevent or detect their exploitation. Amid a swirl of misinformation and disinformation about elections, CISA seems to be trying to walk a line between not alarming the public and stressing the need for election officials to take action.

Didn’t the Associated Press (and all the rest of the corrupt corporate media) spend the last 18 months telling the world that anyone who questioned the security of our elections was a conspiracy theorist?

QUESTION #4: Why has a federal judge in Georgia refused to release a report by a cybersecurity expert who inspected Dominion voting machines and found them vulnerable to hacking and manipulation?

Why is Judge Amy Totenberg opposed to the public release of J. Alex Halderman’s special report regarding the vulnerability of electronic voting machines?

 

Why has Judge Totenberg denied a request by the Louisiana secretary of state to review the special report? (Louisiana uses Dominion voting machines as well.) Why has Judge Totenberg denied access to the Halderman report to media outlets as well?

Media outlets such as Fox News and One America News (OAN) are currently being sued for defamation by Dominion — and a federal judge is refusing to release a report that reportedly shows the Dominion machines are not secure?

Think about it.

 

 

The greatest assault on electoral integrity and citizen rights since the 1960 '(s)election'.  An evil that has a six decade stink.

[SackMan518]

2 minutes ago, HipKat said:

That’s very cute how you’re trying to move the goal posts, but you’re missing out on my point. You originally made it look like these vulnerabilities had been exploited. I pointed out they have not been exploited as it clearly says in the article that you used. Now all of a sudden you’re moving the goalposts I repeating the same thing I said.

I fail to see how I'm moving the goalposts. The vulnerabilities are there but then a government agency, CISA, said there was no evidence they were exploited and then admit that it isn't their jurisdiction to analyze such. Conclusion? Don't bother with CISA since they deal with government cybersecurity and not elections.

[HipKat]

2 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

I fail to see how I'm moving the goalposts. The vulnerabilities are there but then a government agency, CISA, said there was no evidence they were exploited and then admit that it isn't their jurisdiction to analyze such. Conclusion? Don't bother with CISA since they deal with government cybersecurity and not elections.

Because you’re using it to insinuate that those machines were tampered with

[SackMan518]

1 hour ago, HipKat said:

Because you’re using it to insinuate that those machines were tampered with

We'll never know because many of them were not subject to analysis and/or were wiped out. To me that is not properly running an election.

[HipKat]

1 hour ago, SackMan518 said:

We'll never know because many of them were not subject to analysis and/or were wiped out. To me that is not properly running an election.

You mean after all the votes were counted and the recounts, etc?

[212frawk]

4 big answers for proponents of the big lie.

1. Its a lie.
2. Its a big lie
3. Its a really big lie
4. You are a fucking moron cause you swallowed (cause that's what you do) the big lie.

[SackMan518]

3 hours ago, HipKat said:

You mean after all the votes were counted and the recounts, etc?

Yup, the recounts counting the same counterfeit votes.

[HipKat]

12 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

Yup, the recounts counting the same counterfeit votes.

That there are no evidence of existing. See, if there WERE counterfeit votes, there'd be more votes than people who voted, BUT, that's not the case. The number of votes:the number of voters adds up.

Your premise is, as usual, based on a lie that you would rather believe no matter how many times it's proven to be a lie

[SackMan518]

6 hours ago, HipKat said:

That there are no evidence of existing. See, if there WERE counterfeit votes, there'd be more votes than people who voted, BUT, that's not the case. The number of votes:the number of voters adds up.

Your premise is, as usual, based on a lie that you would rather believe no matter how many times it's proven to be a lie

Sure, so is that why we have video of people scanning in loads of ballots in the middle of the night after allegedly being closed, people blocking off windows, and throwing out republican poll watchers? Why would they do that if Biden had a comfortable lead? 

Face it, the Big Lie is that Biden won but the Orange Man has your vagina in so much of a twist that you'll pretend to believe it. 

[HipKat]

41 minutes ago, SackMan518 said:

Sure, so is that why we have video of people scanning in loads of ballots in the middle of the night after allegedly being closed, people blocking off windows, and throwing out republican poll watchers? Why would they do that if Biden had a comfortable lead? 

Face it, the Big Lie is that Biden won but the Orange Man has your vagina in so much of a twist that you'll pretend to believe it. 

All of this shit has been explained, over and over.

Protesters who stormed a vote-counting site in Detroit on Wednesday, banging on windows and shouting “Stop the count!” appear to have had one thing in common: They organized themselves online.

A New York Times analysis found 32 public and private Facebook groups with a total of 301,000 followers organized an “urgent call to action in Detroit,” asking Republican poll challengers to watch the vote counting at the downtown site, TCF Center. The call was also shared on less popular social networks like Parler and the pro-Trump website TheDonald.win.

The earliest call for additional Republican poll challengers was posted to Facebook at 7:27 a.m., according to The Times’s analysis. “Come to TCF Center,” read the post in a group called Michigan for Donald Trump. “Help needed to protect our lead. Tell others.”

By around 3 p.m., there were dozens of calls posted on Facebook, and people responded by showing up; over 100 people were at the vote-counting site by then.

NBC News earlier reported on a private Facebook group, Stand Up Michigan to Unlock Michigan, that was part of the calls; Facebook removed the group shortly after.

Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

After the protesters arrived, workers began to cover the site’s windows, leading to unfounded rumors about their motivations. Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary, shared one such video, and captioned her post, “SHADY …” It collected 62,000 likes and shares on Twitter, and 7.3 million video views. On Wednesday evening, President Trump tweeted about the falsehood, generating more than 350,000 likes and shares.

——————-

 

 

An example can be seen here (here), where a Facebook user says: “I just spent 37 hours at TCF center in Detroit, I personally witnessed egregious and obvious cheating, and extreme election fraud….Conservatives being barred from coming inside.”

This check will not examine the suggestion of fraud, for which no evidence is provided.

The allegation that Conservatives were barred from coming inside is misleading: Republican and Democrat challengers were allowed inside the room but people from both sides were blocked from re-entering because maximum capacity had been reached.

Emotions were running high in Michigan, a battleground state, as votes continued to be counted across the United States after the election began on Nov. 3.

 

Reuters and the Detroit Free Press reported that confusion arose on the afternoon of Nov. 4 as city election officials blocked 30 people, mostly Republicans but also some Democrats, from re-entering the vote-counting room (here , here) . This was due to capacity restrictions to fight the spread of COVID-19.

The decision angered the crowd outside, who were mostly Republicans, and led to posts on social media suggesting it was a partisan decision to prevent Conservatives from viewing the counting process.

However, the City of Detroit’s corporation counsel, Lawrence Garcia, the official spokesman on this issue, told Reuters by text message: “Both Republicans and Democrats were inside the ballot-counting room.

“Officials just had to stop letting more in because the room was well beyond capacity of both Republican and Democrat,” he wrote. “There was never a policy of blocking only one party’s election challengers from entering the CCB (Central Counting Board). When we realized we had far more than one challenger per counting board per party - for both parties - we temporarily stopped admitting all challengers regardless of party.”

——————-

 

A video shared on Twitter by the Trump campaign appears to show workers at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia, where absentee ballots for the 2020 election were tabulated. One worker can be seen pulling something that looks like a suitcase out from under a table.

WATCH: Video footage from Georgia shows suitcases filled with ballots pulled from under a table AFTER supervisors told poll workers to leave room and 4 people stayed behind to keep counting votes pic.twitter.com/AcbTI1pxn4

— Team Trump (@TeamTrump) December 3, 2020

 

The tweet reads: “Video footage from Georgia shows suitcases filled with ballots pulled from under a table AFTER supervisors told poll workers to leave room and 4 people stayed behind to keep counting votes.”

While some workers chose to leave the arena before all the ballots were scanned, election officials agree that the video shows proper protocol for handling the ballots being followed. For instance, communications manager for Georgia’s secretary of state Walter Jones said in a statement to Check Your Fact that, “Nothing we have learned from the independent monitor or our investigation have suggested any improper ballots were scanned.”

Gabriel Sterling, Georgia’s voting systems implementation manager, likewise confirmed that the video showed normal procedure to the fact-checking website Lead Stories. “If you look at the video tape, the work you see is the work you would expect, which is you take the sealed suitcase looking things in, you place the ballots on the scanner in manageable batches and you scan them,” Sterling said.

 

 

The “suitcases” in the video were actually “standard containers” that were used to hold ballots, according to Frances Watson, the Georgia secretary of state’s chief investigator. The containers had been emptied out and “the ballots from it were actually out on the table when the media were still there,” Watson told Lead Stories.

Sterling explained that the ballots had been verified by “cutters,” election workers who open absentee ballot envelopes to verify the ballots before they are scanned and counted. The cutters left the arena around 10 p.m. when they finished their work. Other workers began to leave as well, though they were not told to, according to Watson.

“Nobody told them to stay. Nobody told them to leave,” she told Lead Stories. “Nobody gave them any advice on what they should do. And it was still open for them or the public to come back in to view at whatever time they wanted to, as long as they were still working.”

Fulton County Elections Director Richard Barron had five county workers stay behind to finish scanning the ballots, WSB-TV 2, an Atlanta-based television outlet, reported on Nov. 4. These are seemingly the individuals seen in the video.

 

“Some people were let go, and when I found out they were letting people go, I told them they needed to stay,” Barron said.

Barron repeated during a Dec. 4 Board of Registration and Elections special meeting to re-certify the 2020 election results that the video showed “normal processing.” (RELATED: Does This Video Show Ballots Being Destroyed In Georgia’s Cobb County?)

“What the video shows is that they pulled out plastic bins from underneath the desk,” Barron said in the meeting. “Those are bins that they keep under their desk near the scanners. They then cut those seals that are on those, open those up and pull the ballots out. They were still in the process of cleaning so they hadn’t sealed those ballot boxes up so they were able to start right back up. It was normal processing that occurred there, as Gabe Sterling from the state explained.”

Additionally, WSB-TV 2 investigative reporter Justin Gray shared on Twitter that he had reviewed the footage himself and saw no evidence of anything “improper” occuring.

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Philly'sFinest]

2 hours ago, HipKat said:

All of this shit has been explained, over and over.

Protesters who stormed a vote-counting site in Detroit on Wednesday, banging on windows and shouting “Stop the count!” appear to have had one thing in common: They organized themselves online.

A New York Times analysis found 32 public and private Facebook groups with a total of 301,000 followers organized an “urgent call to action in Detroit,” asking Republican poll challengers to watch the vote counting at the downtown site, TCF Center. The call was also shared on less popular social networks like Parler and the pro-Trump website TheDonald.win.

The earliest call for additional Republican poll challengers was posted to Facebook at 7:27 a.m., according to The Times’s analysis. “Come to TCF Center,” read the post in a group called Michigan for Donald Trump. “Help needed to protect our lead. Tell others.”

By around 3 p.m., there were dozens of calls posted on Facebook, and people responded by showing up; over 100 people were at the vote-counting site by then.

NBC News earlier reported on a private Facebook group, Stand Up Michigan to Unlock Michigan, that was part of the calls; Facebook removed the group shortly after.

Facebook did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

After the protesters arrived, workers began to cover the site’s windows, leading to unfounded rumors about their motivations. Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary, shared one such video, and captioned her post, “SHADY …” It collected 62,000 likes and shares on Twitter, and 7.3 million video views. On Wednesday evening, President Trump tweeted about the falsehood, generating more than 350,000 likes and shares.

——————-

 

 

An example can be seen here (here), where a Facebook user says: “I just spent 37 hours at TCF center in Detroit, I personally witnessed egregious and obvious cheating, and extreme election fraud….Conservatives being barred from coming inside.”

This check will not examine the suggestion of fraud, for which no evidence is provided.

The allegation that Conservatives were barred from coming inside is misleading: Republican and Democrat challengers were allowed inside the room but people from both sides were blocked from re-entering because maximum capacity had been reached.

Emotions were running high in Michigan, a battleground state, as votes continued to be counted across the United States after the election began on Nov. 3.

 

Reuters and the Detroit Free Press reported that confusion arose on the afternoon of Nov. 4 as city election officials blocked 30 people, mostly Republicans but also some Democrats, from re-entering the vote-counting room (here , here) . This was due to capacity restrictions to fight the spread of COVID-19.

The decision angered the crowd outside, who were mostly Republicans, and led to posts on social media suggesting it was a partisan decision to prevent Conservatives from viewing the counting process.

However, the City of Detroit’s corporation counsel, Lawrence Garcia, the official spokesman on this issue, told Reuters by text message: “Both Republicans and Democrats were inside the ballot-counting room.

“Officials just had to stop letting more in because the room was well beyond capacity of both Republican and Democrat,” he wrote. “There was never a policy of blocking only one party’s election challengers from entering the CCB (Central Counting Board). When we realized we had far more than one challenger per counting board per party - for both parties - we temporarily stopped admitting all challengers regardless of party.”

——————-

 

A video shared on Twitter by the Trump campaign appears to show workers at the State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Georgia, where absentee ballots for the 2020 election were tabulated. One worker can be seen pulling something that looks like a suitcase out from under a table.

WATCH: Video footage from Georgia shows suitcases filled with ballots pulled from under a table AFTER supervisors told poll workers to leave room and 4 people stayed behind to keep counting votes pic.twitter.com/AcbTI1pxn4

— Team Trump (@TeamTrump) December 3, 2020

 

The tweet reads: “Video footage from Georgia shows suitcases filled with ballots pulled from under a table AFTER supervisors told poll workers to leave room and 4 people stayed behind to keep counting votes.”

While some workers chose to leave the arena before all the ballots were scanned, election officials agree that the video shows proper protocol for handling the ballots being followed. For instance, communications manager for Georgia’s secretary of state Walter Jones said in a statement to Check Your Fact that, “Nothing we have learned from the independent monitor or our investigation have suggested any improper ballots were scanned.”

Gabriel Sterling, Georgia’s voting systems implementation manager, likewise confirmed that the video showed normal procedure to the fact-checking website Lead Stories. “If you look at the video tape, the work you see is the work you would expect, which is you take the sealed suitcase looking things in, you place the ballots on the scanner in manageable batches and you scan them,” Sterling said.

 

 

The “suitcases” in the video were actually “standard containers” that were used to hold ballots, according to Frances Watson, the Georgia secretary of state’s chief investigator. The containers had been emptied out and “the ballots from it were actually out on the table when the media were still there,” Watson told Lead Stories.

Sterling explained that the ballots had been verified by “cutters,” election workers who open absentee ballot envelopes to verify the ballots before they are scanned and counted. The cutters left the arena around 10 p.m. when they finished their work. Other workers began to leave as well, though they were not told to, according to Watson.

“Nobody told them to stay. Nobody told them to leave,” she told Lead Stories. “Nobody gave them any advice on what they should do. And it was still open for them or the public to come back in to view at whatever time they wanted to, as long as they were still working.”

Fulton County Elections Director Richard Barron had five county workers stay behind to finish scanning the ballots, WSB-TV 2, an Atlanta-based television outlet, reported on Nov. 4. These are seemingly the individuals seen in the video.

 

“Some people were let go, and when I found out they were letting people go, I told them they needed to stay,” Barron said.

Barron repeated during a Dec. 4 Board of Registration and Elections special meeting to re-certify the 2020 election results that the video showed “normal processing.” (RELATED: Does This Video Show Ballots Being Destroyed In Georgia’s Cobb County?)

“What the video shows is that they pulled out plastic bins from underneath the desk,” Barron said in the meeting. “Those are bins that they keep under their desk near the scanners. They then cut those seals that are on those, open those up and pull the ballots out. They were still in the process of cleaning so they hadn’t sealed those ballot boxes up so they were able to start right back up. It was normal processing that occurred there, as Gabe Sterling from the state explained.”

Additionally, WSB-TV 2 investigative reporter Justin Gray shared on Twitter that he had reviewed the footage himself and saw no evidence of anything “improper” occuring.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The video clearly shows stacks being scanned and scanned over and over. Three or four times they do it. There is nothing normal about that. Factor in the water main break lie and most of the poll workers leaving, and we have a clear cut case of some type of operation to commit fraud.

And as far as the TCF Center goes...I'd listen and read the testimony from the numerous people that signed affidavits as to what happened. I know you have only read the info that fits the narrative you choose to believe, but these people gave damning testimony. I watched and listened to it, and it is very compelling.

And these irregularities happened all over. There's similar testimony in AZ, WI, GA, and PA. They refused to let poll watchers in in Philadelphia...even with a court order. Covid was used as an excuse in some of these cases, and that was also part of the plan to alter and subvert rules and regulations in many places.

We all know that if even a fraction of what happened was reversed, that Dems would have burned cities to the ground...insisting it was stolen and vowing to cause as much pain and suffering as needed until it's fixed.

There's just so much that took place that was not standard in terms of voting and voting laws, and there were more irregularities and shenanigans than any other election by a mile...yet we had everyone and their mother come out a week after saying it was the most secure election in American history...which I think anyone with any common sense and logic would not agree with.

I still believe that it's all going to come out, and that the house of cards will eventually collapse. 

I'd try to at least entertain the things that we have been trying to tell you because if or when it comes to light, it's going to hit you hard.

[Philly'sFinest]

https://rumble.com/v1cev5j-election-fraud-algorithm-exposed-odonnell-drops-a-bomb.html

And if you think there aren't some very smart and determined people that are still digging and still coming up with findings that need to be examined further, then you're not paying attention.

This Video is 10 minutes, but it goes into how the vote reporting is done, and maybe even more importantly, by whom.

They also said that the Fulton County data is much worse and will be revealed soon.

This will never go away, and we will keep fighting for transparency until we get the answers we need to be sure we have free and fair elections