NFL Fraud

[Thebowflexbody]

Unhinged post above.  Avoid.

[the climber]

On 1/27/2021 at 9:55 AM, HipKat said:

They have all sorts of medications your Physician can prescribe for you, you don't have to live like this!

[rcas0308]

On 1/27/2021 at 12:34 PM, HipKat said:

And the moral of the story is that people, specifically people who support Donald Trump, can't take a fucking joke

It's not funny because 20 million more people voted for Biden than Hillary...that's so funny. Not really,  I think it's sad really sad people believe they weren't dooped! Almost as sad as late night comedy for the past 4 years 

[HipKat]

1 hour ago, rcas0308 said:

It's not funny because 20 million more people voted for Biden than Hillary...that's so funny. Not really,  I think it's sad really sad people believe they weren't dooped! Almost as sad as late night comedy for the past 4 years 

Got any evidence?? Why is it so hard for you MAGA people too understand that most people HATE Trump. Remember that only 43% Approval Rating he carried for 4 years?? You think you're part of a majority?? lol No. I been trying to tell you people this for 4 years. You REALLY think someone who couldn't get over 45% approval was going to win after 300,000 people had died of as virus he admitted on tape he purposefully kept from us?? Use your fucking head.

 

 

https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/56038/are-there-more-democrats-than-republicans-in-the-united-stat

 

I have been thinking about the Democratic Party and whether or not its members are more numerous than the opposing faction.

Evidence to suggest this is the case:

1. This party is expected to win the popular vote for president seven out of eight times since 1992. Please don't say "this hasn't happened yet". If this bothers you, say 6 out of 7.
2. The party has received 51.9 percent of the votes cast in presidential elections from 1992 to 2016 for it or its opponent, the Republican Party. This shows that 2012 was the mean election in popular vote as of 2016.
3. Party registration in states that register by party says this same thing.
4. Trump's approval has not gone above 50 percent ever as president on 538.
5. A plurality of Americans consistently supported impeachment by 2 to 5 points while it was happening.

This suggests that the partisan lean the American electorate is about D+4. I believe that it might be closer to D+5 now for various reasons and the fact that 2012 was the mean result. This can get a little bit fuzzy because of independents.

 

It really depends on how you define 'members', but both early registration totals and opinion polling suggest that there are significantly more Democrats than Republicans. For example, Ballot Access News has collated the early 2020 registration totals from 32 states, and presents the figure of 45,715,952 Democrats compared to 33,284,020 Republicans in its March 2020 edition, which translates to a two-party advantage of D+15. However, this figure needs to be taken in context - similar figures from 2016 also gave a similar early advantage of D+15.

If we look at opinion polling, Gallup has collated party affiliation polls back to 2004. The most recent poll at the time of writing gives a D+11 advantage. Looking just at the net Republican/Democrat advantage, ignoring Independents, we can create the graph below - with positive percentages representing a Democrat lead, and negative percentages representing a Republican lead.

 

 

[rcas0308]

2 hours ago, HipKat said:

Got any evidence?? Why is it so hard for you MAGA people too understand that most people HATE Trump. Remember that only 43% Approval Rating he carried for 4 years?? You think you're part of a majority?? lol No. I been trying to tell you people this for 4 years. You REALLY think someone who couldn't get over 45% approval was going to win after 300,000 people had died of as virus he admitted on tape he purposefully kept from us?? Use your fucking head.

https://politics.stackexchange.com/questions/56038/are-there-more-democrats-than-republicans-in-the-united-stat

I have been thinking about the Democratic Party and whether or not its members are more numerous than the opposing faction.

Evidence to suggest this is the case:

1. This party is expected to win the popular vote for president seven out of eight times since 1992. Please don't say "this hasn't happened yet". If this bothers you, say 6 out of 7.
2. The party has received 51.9 percent of the votes cast in presidential elections from 1992 to 2016 for it or its opponent, the Republican Party. This shows that 2012 was the mean election in popular vote as of 2016.
3. Party registration in states that register by party says this same thing.
4. Trump's approval has not gone above 50 percent ever as president on 538.
5. A plurality of Americans consistently supported impeachment by 2 to 5 points while it was happening.

This suggests that the partisan lean the American electorate is about D+4. I believe that it might be closer to D+5 now for various reasons and the fact that 2012 was the mean result. This can get a little bit fuzzy because of independents.

It really depends on how you define 'members', but both early registration totals and opinion polling suggest that there are significantly more Democrats than Republicans. For example, Ballot Access News has collated the early 2020 registration totals from 32 states, and presents the figure of 45,715,952 Democrats compared to 33,284,020 Republicans in its March 2020 edition, which translates to a two-party advantage of D+15. However, this figure needs to be taken in context - similar figures from 2016 also gave a similar early advantage of D+15.

If we look at opinion polling, Gallup has collated party affiliation polls back to 2004. The most recent poll at the time of writing gives a D+11 advantage. Looking just at the net Republican/Democrat advantage, ignoring Independents, we can create the graph below - with positive percentages representing a Democrat lead, and negative percentages representing a Republican lead.

MAGA? Just American who wants a fair election. Sorry you can't see bullshit right in front of you. More people voted for Trump this time around and Biden swooped in for the record by far. Just after a overnight intermission..aww bull to the shit. 
 
Do you ever think maybe the powers to be wants to be in wars in the Middle East, wants war for profit, wants people poor and dependent upon them. Precisely why they targeted the orange man who likes to speak frankly. He didn't play ball. The federal reserve families paid their companies well in the pandemic and gained more control over the free market ..How dare Kennedy, Reagan and Trump in the past expose them for who they are. All shot or targeted relentlessly in the media. Study up on Rockefeller and Facism..you will see that Hitler was just a pawn for him and his cronies for oil sales. Oh and they founded the FED too. 
 

 

[HipKat]

5 hours ago, rcas0308 said:

MAGA? Just American who wants a fair election. Sorry you can't see bullshit right in front of you. More people voted for Trump this time around and Biden swooped in for the record by far. Just after a overnight intermission..aww bull to the shit. 
 
Do you ever think maybe the powers to be wants to be in wars in the Middle East, wants war for profit, wants people poor and dependent upon them. Precisely why they targeted the orange man who likes to speak frankly. He didn't play ball. The federal reserve families paid their companies well in the pandemic and gained more control over the free market ..How dare Kennedy, Reagan and Trump in the past expose them for who they are. All shot or targeted relentlessly in the media. Study up on Rockefeller and Facism..you will see that Hitler was just a pawn for him and his cronies for oil sales. Oh and they founded the FED too. 
 

Lol... So, that evidence?

Btw, Trump did not get us out of any wars and did you know that last year the United States conducted the most drone bombings in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan ever? Ever!

Now you tell me who's being fed up a bunch of bullshit. More people voted overall. Trump is the least popular president in the history of this country. Get it through your fucking heads.

[rcas0308]

5 hours ago, HipKat said:

Lol... So, that evidence?

Btw, Trump did not get us out of any wars and did you know that last year the United States conducted the most drone bombings in Syria, Iraq and Afghanistan ever? Ever!

Now you tell me who's being fed up a bunch of bullshit. More people voted overall. Trump is the least popular president in the history of this country. Get it through your fucking heads.

How do you suggest they get evidence....actually have an investigation? They didn't conduct one. It was only a recount of votes, from the insane amount of people that sent mail in ballots, yet never showed up anywhere with an ID. They didn't actually call these voters back who showed up in person either. You can have voter fraud and easily get away with it these days, that's the whole point. 
 

Hey if you are comfortable with all that there is nothing to talk about here. But for people like me, I understand the art of politics is to lie to the public. The PC answer isn't good enough. Black and White answers aren't good enough. There was some crazy irregularities(the whole town voting blue) and some trends we never saw before in this election and no one wants to ask why. Just let's move on, nothing to see here. If you are okay with this America well then what is there to talk about with you. I fully expect more of the same. People who wrote you your stimulus checks didn't want you to ask questions, they won. Their businesses wiped out their competition and gave them more control over the markets. We all lost here. 
 

Their is a difference from killing Terrorist who want to kill us and trying to transition out of a place we aren't welcome in ...to pointless sticking your nose into other countries business and causing wars over oil. "The War Hawks" who incited conflict in WW1 and WW2 made a lot of money off oil to the Nazis and Allies. They had a eugenic lab in Manhattan in 1912 to create the perfect human race and we want to say Hitler was original. These same "War Hawks" bought a piece of the media because hey if you are the devil, you don't want people to know you exist. Those are the same fuckers that started the Federal Reserve and wack presidents who try to expose them. All though the originals may be dead their families aren't and they have a stake in almost every major business in the world, including the media. So really there is a lot to get through your head. 

[HipKat]

14 minutes ago, rcas0308 said:

How do you suggest they get evidence....actually have an investigation? They didn't conduct one. It was only a recount of votes, from the insane amount of people that sent mail in ballots, yet never showed up anywhere with an ID. They didn't actually call these voters back who showed up in person either. You can have voter fraud and easily get away with it these days, that's the whole point. 

Recounting votes Is an investigation. As is reviewing video, etc. All accusations made by the right were debunked for being filed without merit..  And who do expect to investigate?? Why, let's start with the accusers, who "investigated" and showed up in court with nothing - over 50 times. This is a ridiculous argument that's been repeated over and over. NO EVIDENCE!!!! Can't have a crime if there wasn't one.

And then - there's the other leg of this; all this effort to protect the worst President in the history of this country who did way more damage than good. It would make a lot more sense if it were someone who hasn't left behind a trainwreck that will take at least a generation to recover from.

Oh, wait, I forgot, you're not allowed to acknowledge anything negative about the Trump Administration... My bad

[rcas0308]

1 hour ago, HipKat said:

Recounting votes Is an investigation. As is reviewing video, etc. All accusations made by the right were debunked for being filed without merit..  And who do expect to investigate?? Why, let's start with the accusers, who "investigated" and showed up in court with nothing - over 50 times. This is a ridiculous argument that's been repeated over and over. NO EVIDENCE!!!! Can't have a crime if there wasn't one.

And then - there's the other leg of this; all this effort to protect the worst President in the history of this country who did way more damage than good. It would make a lot more sense if it were someone who hasn't left behind a trainwreck that will take at least a generation to recover from.

Oh, wait, I forgot, you're not allowed to acknowledge anything negative about the Trump Administration... My bad

Takes two to tango would you not agree? You only see one side that's your problem, always has been 

I think you give a little too much credit to the validity of a recount. Not much you can do after the fact, people are gone, they went home..mailed it in literally. You just have to ask your self are you okay with it because you don't like someone.  Many have said a resounding yes. So the problem lives on for future elections. You all said this fraud existed the last election why the denial now. Because the media and people in power told you to move on and so you did. No investigation, a recount is exactly that a recounting of ballots submitted, not a close look at the validity of them 

[HipKat]

1 hour ago, rcas0308 said:

Takes two to tango would you not agree? You only see one side that's your problem, always has been 

I think you give a little too much credit to the validity of a recount. Not much you can do after the fact, people are gone, they went home..mailed it in literally. You just have to ask your self are you okay with it because you don't like someone.  Many have said a resounding yes. So the problem lives on for future elections. You all said this fraud existed the last election why the denial now. Because the media and people in power told you to move on and so you did. No investigation, a recount is exactly that a recounting of ballots submitted, not a close look at the validity of them 

Some recounts were three times and more. How much validity do you need? And yes, the validity of each vote was checked - that's why it took so long. Maybe you're Pro-Trump mouthpieces forgot to report that.

I never said any fraud existed in the last election and I only heard that from people on the fringe. Almost everyone on both sides agree that Hillary was a horrible candidate and Trump won more because of her than in spite of her.

[rcas0308]

11 minutes ago, HipKat said:

Some recounts were three times and more. How much validity do you need? And yes, the validity of each vote was checked - that's why it took so long. Maybe you're Pro-Trump mouthpieces forgot to report that.

I never said any fraud existed in the last election and I only heard that from people on the fringe. Almost everyone on both sides agree that Hillary was a horrible candidate and Trump won more because of her than in spite of her.

No arguing with you, you have that blind faith in government and media, exactly the way it was designed for many 

[HipKat]

Just now, rcas0308 said:

No arguing with you, you have that blind faith in government and media, exactly the way it was designed for many 

The irony of you accusing someone else of having blind faith is impossible to miss

[rcas0308]

1 minute ago, HipKat said:

The irony of you accusing someone else of having blind faith is impossible to miss

Wrong I'm probably one of the most reasonable people on here 

[HipKat]

52 minutes ago, rcas0308 said:

Wrong I'm probably one of the most reasonable people on here 

Sure thing...