Game-On for the Coup?

[deleted]

I would like to thank the American Founding Fathers for inspiring my defense against a toothless international attack.

Professor (not much of one obviously) I will always fight against your brand of totalitarian socialism. 

This.  Is Patriotism. 

Now go do as your government directs you.  

[SackMan518]

47 minutes ago, FanBack said:

I would like to thank the American Founding Fathers for inspiring my defense against a toothless international attack.

Professor (not much of one obviously) I will always fight against your brand of totalitarian socialism. 

This.  Is Patriotism. 

Now go do as your government directs you.  

Found a recent picture of Piggy on the internet.

[DannyBoy]

 

Some striking similarities between what President Donald Trump and John F. Kennedy had to deal with regarding government deep state bureaucrats.  James W. Douglass,  in his book  "JFK and the Unspeakable".

 

Archives: Catholic Author Documented Incredible Facts In JFK Assassination

November 22, 2020 by spirit daily

But it is all documented in extraordinarily mA strong case can be made that John Fitzgerald Kennedy — the first Catholic president — had intensely upset intelligence and military circles in the U.S. with his stated efforts to reconcile with the U.S.S.R. following the Cuba missile crisis. There was also anger over the President’s desire to seek better relations with Fidel Castro, halt conflict in Laos, and — last but not least — end America’s direct involvement in Viet Nam. That Kennedy — with the help of Pope John XXIII [previous article] — was attempting this is not commonly known. It was done in large part through diplomatic “back channels.”eticulous detail (including personal interviews and 96 pages of footnotes) by Catholic author and theologian James W. Douglass in his book JFK and the Unspeakable, which poses the question: Was Kennedy assassinated as a result?

And the answer, says Douglass — whose book has been lauded by the likes of Gaeton Fonzi, an investigator for the U.S. House Select Committee on Assassinations, Professor Richard Falk of Princeton University, and Mark Lewis Taylor of Princeton Theological Seminary — is yes: JFK was slain by American intelligence operatives.

It’s no theory. He marshals tremendous evidence — facts we have not seen before, and others we have forgotten or have not seen in proper context.

We approach this at a moment when we all recall September 11.

Before that attack, the Kennedy event was modern America’s most traumatic — and fraught with potential spiritual significance.

It still plagues us because we have never felt settled with official explanations and no one wants to think that factions in the U.S. government would kill the nation’s leader (in the name of liberty, as well as for other reasons).

Yet it appears this is the case. We’ll say at the outset that there is no final “smoking gun.” There is no tape recording of intelligence agents meeting with Lee Harvey Oswald. There is no video of or confession from conspirators and additional gunmen.

Moreover, most conspiracy theories have strayed toward the anecdotal or hysterical. One famous case was built around a New Orleans businessman named Clay Shaw who government agencies have compellingly argued could not have been a linchpin in any such operation.

This book doesn’t even mention him. Instead it first focuses on the foreign moves by Kennedy with which many military leaders — as well as the Central Intelligence Agency — not only disagreed but interpreted as dangerous and highly threatening to their branches of government. Indeed, Douglass recounts how, after the Bay of Pigs fiasco (whereby C.I.A. operatives were caught red-handed trying to provoke an all-out conflict with Cuba), Kennedy threatened to splinter the C.I.A. “into a thousand pieces and scatter it to the winds. ” The agency had engineered the aborted attempt to invade that nation and as it happens was also working behind his back to undermine Asian and Cuban peace efforts — including through assassination.

“In his short presidency, Kennedy began to take steps to deal with the C.I.A.,” writes Douglass. “He tried to redefine the C.I.A.’s mandate and to reduce its power in his National Security Actions memoranda 55 and 57, which took military-type operations out of the hands of the C.I.A. President Kennedy then asked the three principal C.I.A. planners for the Bay of Pigs to resign: Director Allen Dulles, Deputy Director Richard Bissell, Jr., and Deputy Director General Charles Cabell.” (After the assassination, Dulles was appointed by President Lyndon Johnson to serve on the Warren Commission.)

JFK also moved quietly to cut the C.I.A. budget in 1962 and again in 1963, aiming at a twenty percent reduction. The “splintering” had begun. And the surreptitious foreign operations of the C.I.A., especially in Viet Nam and Cuba (where it had a special team called Alpha 66), were in great jeopardy.

Did this agency — which beyond question had developed assassination units — turn one of those teams on the President himself (in effect accomplishing a silent coup, as it had caused uprisings or coups in Asia, Central America, and elsewhere [see list])?

Until now, we have not been able to decide whether it was a lone gunman at Dallas or some sort of larger plot. For years — for decades — the notion of a conspiracy seemed out there on the fringe.

After reading this book, it seems so, perhaps, no longer.

Consider, according to Douglass:

— That, incredibly and inexplicably, as Douglass details at length, Lee Oswald once worked at Atsugi Naval Air Station in Japan, a super-secret base of operations for the C.I.A., with the express purpose, according to former C.I.A. financial officer Jim Wilcott, of “becoming a double agent assignment to the U.S.S.R.”

— That when Lee Harvey Oswald returned to the U.S. on June 13, 1962, after his supposed “defection” to the Soviet Union, he was met at U.S. Customs not with arrest and prosecution, but by Spas T. Raikin, a representative of the Travelers’ Aid Society. He was granted a passport almost immediately.

Raikin at the time was secretary-general of an anti-Communist organization with extensive intelligence connections — an unlikely source of support for Oswald, who supposedly had been a traitor. Or had he been a C.I.A. plant?

Archives: Catholic Author Documented Incredible Facts In JFK Assassination (spiritdailyblog.com)

You won't see Sleezy Joe and his "aids"  doing anything honorable.  

 

 

 

[jc856]

Wild Bill Donovan.

 

[Thebowflexbody]

On 11/21/2020 at 1:35 PM, SackMan518 said:

Found a recent picture of Piggy on the internet.

He's still in excellent shape I see.

[SackMan518]

16 hours ago, DannyBoy said:

“In his short presidency, Kennedy began to take steps to deal with the C.I.A.,” writes Douglass. “He tried to redefine the C.I.A.’s mandate and to reduce its power in his National Security Actions memoranda 55 and 57, which took military-type operations out of the hands of the C.I.A. President Kennedy then asked the three principal C.I.A. planners for the Bay of Pigs to resign: Director Allen Dulles, Deputy Director Richard Bissell, Jr., and Deputy Director General Charles Cabell.” (After the assassination, Dulles was appointed by President Lyndon Johnson to serve on the Warren Commission.)

Trump just re-enacted NSA Memorandum 57 recently along with his appointments of non-swamp creatures to oversee everything. Rumor is that's why you haven't seen him in public lately due to the risk of assassination.