Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation since 05/24/2023 in all areas

  1. Last time I checked here it was the Spike’s and the rest of the leftist retards that are telling people to kill themselves, threatening to dox, and posting pictures of their own feces. You tell me who looks like the nut jobs, and who looks like people questioning things using logic and reasoning?
    6 points
  2. 5 points
  3. Too bad you can’t grow hair like you grow fat cells, you could’ve had a shot! You may want to enter “the fattest Canadian” contest and “the dumbest Canadian” contest 👍, you have a decent chance of one of those trophies... Good luck Blobby 🍻.
    5 points
  4. Even the Ukrainians now admit they've lost Bakhmut. The Ukrainians are said to have the best-trained army in Europe and have had the full backing of NATO, yet they lost to Russian militia fighters. Almost none of the fighting on the ground in the city was done by the Russian army, which mainly provided artillery support, e.g. After the loss of Bakhmut, the MSM is suddenly all about how strategically unimportant Bakhmut is. All but forgotten now is Zelensky's statement last year that holding Bakhmut was critical and that it could spell the end of the Ukraine if they lost it. What is the US strategy? How is it in the US's national interest to continue supplying the Ukrainians with unlimited funds, equipment, weapons, training, etc., especially in a cause that is almost certainly a lost one? The warmonger-in-chief had previously said that too much involvement could lead to WWIII, but since then he's been involving the US more and more by providing tanks, missiles, training, logistical support, etc. The latest pledge to Ukraine is to provide F-16s. But a few dozen F-16s aren't going to make any difference. Even the Pentagon has admitted this. The possible risk of escalation into WWIII remains and the economies of the West continue to suffer, but, well, as long as we can weaken Russia by fighting them with Ukrainians to the last man -- which seems to be the unstated policy of the US government -- then everything's just fine, I guess.
    4 points
  5. Yep, I’m looking at bikers with pitchforks outside a gay bar right now.
    4 points
  6. Nope, instead they try to overthrow the government for an orange hate filled idiot, while they preach law and order and police support. All in the name of Christian values.
    4 points
  7. You mean just like Liberals bringing up Trump when Republicans and rightfully so point out how Biden is a terrible President.
    4 points
  8. You put too many threads here @SpikedLemonade. Please stop. It's just one giant list of obtuse topics that are boring.
    4 points
  9. I have no idea what you're talking about and went on a divergent point that totally misses the idea. Please try again and give me something that I can debate with you. I really tried to read that but all I see is the inebriated rant from an Uncle at Thanksgiving. We're talking about a common culture in America. You're adding in religion, the Constitution, and somehow the Nazis for a weird reason that are small subsects of a larger culture. The fact is that drags queens, homosexuality, radicals, and everything else that you talk about a lot are just a very, very small voice that doesn't even hit a blip even though they've been given a HUGE megaphone to make everyone thinks that these are the imminent issues of today and they aren't. Globally, cultures also agree. The human brain works as it is for a default for a reason and social engineering will not reprogram the organic software so don't think that you can become God over Man.
    4 points
  10. What does this have to do with values? Why is when the right wing is challenged ie guns all we hear about is the constitution. But when the right challenges anyone else we hear the it's our values talk. Aren't drag queens protected by by the constitution? Where are you deriving your values from? Christianity, catholicism. The same folks who molested kids, help hide Nazis and justified slavery through the bible? Spare us all with the bullshit. It's not values it bigotry and hate.
    4 points
  11. The only way Allen gets beat in the playoffs is by McDermott coaching scared. It happened the last 3 seasons now.
    4 points
  12. Whoa! Another threat to kill a poster? Lefties are so angry. Can dish it but can't take it. Good thing we know you're scared of a little call center caller from India or we would report your threats to the authorities. We did save them just in case though. Back to topis , speaking of sea or water animals I'm told your term of endearment of the Mrs is Shamu . That true?
    3 points
  13. Thank you to all the men and women who have served and are serving. Please let's give our veterans free healthcare to seek treatment wherever they prefer.
    3 points
  14. Espionage Act charges have been mentioned by a legal expert as prosecutors have gathered evidence that Trump sometimes showed classified documents to others and kept them in a place they were visible to others in his office. In a damning and well documented report in the Washington Post, we learned today: “Prosecutors in addition have gathered evidence indicating that Trump at times kept classified documents in his office in a place where they were visible and sometimes showed them to others, these people said. Taken together, the new details of the classified-documents investigation suggest a greater breadth and specificity to the instances of possible obstruction found by the FBI and Justice Department than has been previously reported.” Even during his presidency when Trump treated Mar-a-Lago like a “Winter White House” he kept no visitor logs or other system of tracking visitors. Forbes has documented a few of the thousands of visitors through a compilation of photos shared and other means, showing a range from conspiracy theorists to former European Parliament member Nigel Farage , Ray J and the former general who pleaded guilty to lying to investigators Michael Flynn (not a great person to be seeing classified documents), Roger Stone who the government accused of undermining the Russia investigation by lying about his communications with Wikileaks, intimidating a witness, and more was found guilty of seven felony counts but later pardoned by Trump, and also in addition to the usual suspects of Republicans and conservative activists were the son of Brazil’s president Eduardo Bolsonaro and Lee Dong-sup, who was a member of South Korea’s parliament in 2018. Representatives from Brazil, South Korea and Russia – check. The list is not comforting, especially from a man who made a “joke” about his bigger “red button” just last night. Over this incredibly disturbing news, former Special Counsel for the Department of Defense and co-editor-in-chief of Just Security Ryan Goodman wrote, “I expect this will result in Espionage Act charges. Dissemination is key.” “The reported facts are now far beyond just an obstruction case. Willfully disseminating to third parties is also easily distinguishable from Pence, Biden, other instances in which DOJ has declined to prosecute (eg Alberto Gonzales),” Goodman continued. In the next tweet, he highlighted an excerpt from this breaking news, “A second employee who help Walt Nauta move boxes into storage room a day before FBI visit on June 3. The next day… “the employee helped Nauta pack an SUV ‘when former president Trump left for Bedminster.’” Goodman pointed out a section saying the DOJ has “evidence that even before Trump’s office received the subpoena in May, he had what some officials have dubbed a ‘dress rehearsal’ for moving government documents that he did not want to relinquish,” from which he concludes the following two charges are applicable: People familiar with the situation told the Post reporters that “Smith’s team has concluded the bulk of its investigative work in the documents case and believes it has uncovered a handful of distinct episodes of obstructionist conduct,” one of which occurred AFTER the August 8th FBI search. Donald Trump has denied all wrong-doing in the classified documents case, even claiming during a March Fox appearance that he had “the right to take” classified documents with him to Mar-a-Lago and in his recent CNN town hall when asked if he had shown the classified documents to anyone else, said, “Not really… I would have the right to… not that I can think of.” In reality, intentionally disclosing classified information without authorization is a federal crime under the Espionage Act, hence Goodman’s mentioning of it in this case. Punishment can be up to 10 years in prison or even charged with treason. Trump has labeled this investigation a “witch hunt.”
    3 points
  15. Do you know what’s funny fatman? Unlike you, he can probably see his testicles. You probably haven’t seen yours since you were in your 20s.
    3 points
  16. Get ready for some terror attacks during June pride month. The usual suspects will call them hoaxes, or FBI false flags, then go on to justify the attacks. It is the next step after dehumanizing LGBTQ people as groomers. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/may/28/lone-wolf-far-right-terror-attack-warning
    3 points
  17. That freak lives in a bubble and jerks off to his right wing fantasies.
    3 points
  18. Like I said, @f8ta1ity54just told us that Right Wingers are coming for June to attack LGBTQ yet the guy who had the biggest LGBTQ most lately massacre who killed almost 50 people it was not done by a Right Winger. Hmmmm... do you get it now? I did not celebrate that disgusting attack and if you really think you know anything about me then you know nothing. You tried to spin it as usual, my point is that these attacks are not exclusive for "Right Wingers." Now fuck off because you're boring me again FascistFatBoy and you're an ending record skipping over and over. You know for a fact that I never advocated having LGTBQ people wanted by physical harm situations. You're a liar and a very poor one at that. Now beat it you ungrateful mixed up whack job and find some meaning in your life... maybe back on the BZ. Oh wait... ooops!
    3 points
  19. You so fucking lost it isn’t even funny. I don’t worry about the LGBTJGJYTBFJRFHGBGJFHFVFGGHH community because I am nowhere near them, except now. They stay away from me, I stay away from them. Pretty simple.
    3 points
  20. You cannot possibly be serious. Do we want to list the crimes that Trump is accused of and compare them to a list of crimes that Hillary is accused of? I think the ratio will work out somewhere like 10:1. This is why we can’t can’t get along with this, because your side refuses to deal in realism. We know what Donald Trump’s crimes are, because we can see them. He brags about some of them. We’ve heard the audio and we’ve seen the video. We can pull the numbers. What actual crimes do you have on Hillary? That they’re is actual evidence of?
    3 points
  21. He'll be alright. Paxton will be sleeping easy on his MyPillow 2.0 tonight.
    3 points
  22. An interesting take on what's going on with the Bud Lights and Targets of the world. A while back, I covered the mysterious CEI scores that seemed to be the root of Budweiser’s poorly thought-out marketing campaign with transgender TikToker Dylan Mulvaney. Budweiser and its parent company, Anheuser Busch, have since lost more than $15.7 billion dollars in revenue, a number that is almost unfathomable to most of us. You’d think that this would be a cautionary tale about what the average folks in America want. You’d think this would stop marketing firms in the tracks before making a similar move. You’d be wrong. It has people saying, “What on earth are they thinking?” as it happens again and again. That’s what this article is all about. What they’re thinking. Because “go woke, go broke” is not actually as clear-cut as we might think. The apparent suicide missions may not be quite as deadly as expected. The conclusions in this article may not be popular. But when I begin researching to answer a question I’ve posed, I have an obligation to share my findings honestly, whether I like those findings or not. Since the Bud Light fiasco, one company after another has followed suit. Since that ill-considered partnership, it seems like huge companies are following Anheuser Busch off the exact same cliff in a mission of corporate suicide. Actually, it started before the Bud Light campaign. Notably, Hershey’s celebrated International Woman’s Day by putting a photo of a person who was not born a woman on a candy bar wrapper with a label that said Her/She. Calvin Klein, a company well known for suggestive ads featuring buff, sculpted models in provactive poses, changed course with an ad that appeared in 2022 but has recently resurfaced. This time, they advertised their bras and undergarments with a “pre-surgery” transgender person with a beard and breasts that had not yet been removed at the time of the shoot. Nike immediately partnered with Mulvaney, a biological male, to advertise sports bras and women’s athletic wear. Many women were outraged since this took away promotional opportunities for biological female athletes. As well, Mulvaney’s clip was far from athletic. To be clear, I’m not picking on Mulvaney. The TikToker just happens to be the paid partner in more than one of these controversies. Most people who make a living as an influencer would accept a lucrative offer. I don’t endorse violence or hatred toward those who have made choices I don’t understand. It’s the offer itself with which I take issue. Miller, owned by Molson-Coors, quickly came into the spotlight after Anheuser Busch with an ad apologizing for using women in bikinis in previous advertising campaigns. This ad was actually aired in March, before the Bud Light fiasco. Molson-Coors claims the ad was satirical and stood behind their marketing person. Soon came an ad from Adidas featuring an unnamed, very obviously biological male model in a women’s swimsuit. The advertisement drew backlash for “erasing women” and resulted in an outcry for a “Bud Light moment,” referring to the beer boycott. Not to be outdone, North Face launched a campaign with a drag queen for their “summer of Pride” outdoor gear. Most recently, Target is taking fire for its Pride Month line-up. To be clear, Target has had a Pride Month marketing campaign for as long as I can remember, so the concept itself is not new nor is it directly related to the other campaigns. This year may have been a bridge too far with a unisex “tuck-friendly” swimsuit in adult sizes in a style usually worn by women and a line of Pride clothing for children, including a onesie for infants. Target has since moved the products out of their former front-and-center locations, citing employee safety concerns. The company lost 9 billion dollars in value in the span of a week. What in the world is going on here? Are all the companies losing money? While Bud and Target have suffered losses in the billions, Rolling Stone assures us that actually, the woke do not go broke in this article. At the same time, other pundits say that these companies are taking a financial hit. The Street also says that the ESG crowd is losing money hand over fist. However, it’s important to note that the LBGT community accounts for 3.9 trillion dollars in retail revenue, making this a demographic to be reckoned with for marketing decisions. Just because they aren’t going broke doesn’t mean that it’s what most folks want in their brands. Most of us just want to wear shoes, drink beer, and browse Joanna Gaines’s cute household stuff. We really don’t want moral lessons of tolerance along with our shopping. However, the latest Rasmussen Report tells us that the majority of Americans are turned off by woke marketing. But due to investment groups like BlackRock pushing agendas, you can expect to keep seeing these confounding advertising partnerships on your screens and in your stores. A quick recap of CEI scores CEI stands for Corporate Equality Index. The next two sections of this article are a recap from a previous article. A company can receive up to 100 points in the CEI rating system. Here’s how those points are earned. Now, let me be clear about my own opinions here before I go further. I’m not a conservative. I’m really rather ambivalent about people’s identities and orientations as long as it’s an issue for consenting adults. I know this differs from many in my audience, and I also support the rights of people to not engage in things that are an affront to their own religious or personal doctrines. That’s the beauty of America. (Well, it was, anyway.) However, the above FORCES “public support” of something a person might not support at all. And I am NOT okay with that. I’m very live-and-let-live, but I expect the same courtesy. So why do corporations comply? First of all, money. Of course. So investor money is more important than consumer money. But that’s not all. Companies that don’t comply could lose everything. It’s not just about, “Go woke, go broke.” It’s about, “Don’t go woke, go under.” The message is clear that if you don’t comply, you will be destroyed. So…these companies, in fact, probably aren’t going to go broke. The power of the boycott may not be what it once was. Cancel culture seems only truly to ruin a business if the liberals do it. There’s so much ESG investment money that our effect is somewhat limited. But that doesn’t mean you should support businesses with which you vehemently disagree. At this point, we still have choices. We don’t have to buy Nike footwear or drink Bud Light beer. We’re not required to shop at Target when we need cleaning supplies. We can put our money where our values are. However, we probably shouldn’t expect this to cause a change in the direction these companies are taking. What this does for people who choose not to spend money with these companies is it strengthens their independence. Folks who don’t want to support an agenda have no choice but to seek out other options. The free-est thing you can do is to walk away from things with which you disagree. There’s a culture war afoot. There is a war going on. It’s a culture war. Even those of us who don’t consider ourselves right or left politically are being put in positions we don’t like. The language is heated. One side is accused of being fill-in-the-blank-phobic, hateful, extreme MAGA, and intolerant. The other side is deemed to be Satanist, perverted, hedonistic, regressive left, snowflakes, and ultra-feminist. You have to align with your “side” in an all-or-nothing way, or suddenly, you are called an insulting name. It’s hard to imagine any place people could meet in the middle anymore when the very being of the “other side” is met with disgust and scorn. And that’s the least of it – we’re getting closer every day to violence. In fact, Target said that’s why they pulled their Pride displays – because of the safety of their workers. Folks have had enough, and that’s true for both sides. At some point, it won’t stop with words and boycotts. I’ve often written about the power of the “people holding the microphones,” and this is no different. When the advertising, retail, media, and entertainment industries are all held hostage by CEI scores, we will watch our country continue to divide and devolve. A lot of folks are quietly saying no and I think this will grow. You have to wonder what America is going to look like by the time a pendulum swing occurs. Will we even recognize it by then? What are your thoughts on all of this? What are your thoughts on these advertising campaigns? Are you surprised that the boycotts have not halted this marketing trend in its tracks? Have you stopped supporting any brands? Do you feel investment groups and the CEI have more power than consumers? If so, what do you think can be done about it? LINK
    3 points
  23. Does anyone from this island of Misfit Toys deserve our respect??
    3 points
  24. Trump calls everyone names. All the MAGATs cheer him on. MAGATs try to take the moral high ground when they have no arguments and can only divert the discussion away from the topic.
    3 points
  25. Pfft. I also heard that Donald left the toilet seat up on several occasions during his time in the White House.
    3 points
  26. Let's stop it, you know this is just more bullshit Lawfare that will do nothing. Do you really think this will get any resolution? Trump is in the clear but, however, there were people who were the former VP that know they're getting a big pass because they're on the right side of the hand greasings. Weak sauce WaPo.
    3 points
  27. Except that's not how you have chosen to operate here Someone posts something that you don't agree with, and you attack them instead of actually coming up with a legitimate response That is why you are a poster that offers nothing of value here, and why you should be universally ignored and dismissed
    3 points
  28. Actually it's drag, but I was trying to trigger you fascists. It worked.
    3 points
  29. Are they? Or are they rewarding her for getting Trump to undermine his own legal issues Trump convicting self with own mouth. Donald Trump speaks about his legal woes in ways that would make most defense attys wince. In March interview on FNC, he said that he had "the right to take" classified docs home with him upon leaving office and wouldn't lie that he hadn't looked at them since. At a CNN townhall this month he said he told a Ga. elections official "you owe me" votes. The same townhall, BTW, where he insulted a female writer as a "wack job" just a day after she had won a $5M judgment against him for defamation & sexual assault. Trump, leading contender for the 2024 R nomination, has never hesitated to offer opinion or joust with antagonists. The problem, legal experts say, is that he's under intensifying scrutiny from state & federal prosecutors, and anything he says can be used against him in a court of law, er, in a variety of ways. "Any utterances by a defendant, whether confessions, denials, observations, nonsensical gibberish or just plain goofy are pure gold for prosecutors," said a former asst. US atty. A law prof opined that prosecutors & agents were busily taking notes during the townhall, where he also indicated that he was personally responsible for docs getting from WH to Mar-a-Lardo- "I was there and I took what I took and it gets declassified," a statement at odds with arguments by his lawyers, who had just stated in a letter to Congress that the docs transfer was a result of "haphazard recordskeeping and packing" rather than intent on part of Trump. I just love it that his lawyer said he took them by accident and then he comes out and says no, he took them on purpose. IMO too much is made of whether documents taken are classified or not. ALL presidential records must be turned over to the National Archives at the end of the term. The Orange Utterance-Generator seems to focus on things getting declassified by thinking about them, but classified or not doesn't matter. The documents legally belong to the public, in the custody of NARA.
    3 points
  30. The judge said what Rhodes had done was domestic terrorism. Let's be clear Trump supports Rhodes who also is a terrorist. Put Trump and Rhodes in Guantanamo bay.
    3 points
  31. Makes perfect sense as to why the GOP is trying to remove black history, LGBTQ education, and add Christianity back into schools. The right has no problem with indoctrination as long as it's their form of indoctrination.
    3 points
  32. We also have the support of 70% of the world.
    3 points
  33. "If we go down, we're taking the rest of the world with us!" - Proud Ukrainian patriots
    3 points
  34. I wouldn't drink this piss water if it were free nevermind the woke bullshit people are complaining about.......
    3 points
  35. He can't be any worse than Edmunds was stopping the run between the tackles.
    3 points
×
×
  • Create New...