Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
direbills

TRUMP WILL NOT TESTIFY

Recommended Posts

Ha ha ha. The coward chickenshit does not have the balls to testify. We all knew that. He hides behind the Proud Boys, the White Supremacists, the Oath Keepers and 3 Percenters. He is a coward just like his cult members who hide behind their guns. Just a bunch of cowards.

  • Thanks 2
  • Trump 1
  • Barf 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, direbills said:

Ha ha ha. The coward chickenshit does not have the balls to testify. We all knew that. He hides behind the Proud Boys, the White Supremacists, the Oath Keepers and 3 Percenters. He is a coward just like his cult members who hide behind their guns. Just a bunch of cowards.

Shit take by a shit mind.

Many defendants don't testify.  Especially in criminal proceedings; although this is simply the kookiest collection of Australian marsupial jurisprudence that I have ever seen.  The first impeachment was an outright abuse of power by our legislative branch.  This is just grandstanding.

He should stand up there so myriad, Ignorant Totalitarian-socialist congressman can give long-winded speeches for their dullard constituents?  Hard pass by the Aquarian, our greatest living President.

Just to brighten up this thread:

    kjeQ=&risl=&pid=ImgRaw

 

GetFile.aspx?guid=8690b2d6-67eb-46ff-b7d

gettyimages-509212674.jpg?w=1500

  • Like 1
  • Gay 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, FanBack said:

Shit take by a shit mind.

Many defendants don't testify.  Especially in criminal proceedings; although this is simply the kookiest collection of Australian marsupial jurisprudence that I have ever seen.  The first impeachment was an outright abuse of power by our legislative branch.  This is just grandstanding.

He should stand up there so myriad, Ignorant Totalitarian-socialist congressman can give long-winded speeches for their dullard constituents?  Hard pass by the Aquarian, our greatest living President.

Just to brighten up this thread:

    kjeQ=&risl=&pid=ImgRaw

GetFile.aspx?guid=8690b2d6-67eb-46ff-b7d

gettyimages-509212674.jpg?w=1500

In the interest of balance I was going to post photos of Joe Biden.

I just couldn't find three good photos where he wasn't groping someone.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It's in the best interest of the former president to not take the stand.  I can't see him having the self control to be able to keep from incriminating himself.  

Interesting that he's focused on trying to get the action tossed on constitutionality instead of on whether he's guilty or not.  Maybe his actual case isn't in his favor.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Disagree 1
  • Barf 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, foster said:

It's in the best interest of the former president to not take the stand.  I can't see him having the self control to be able to keep from incriminating himself.  

Interesting that he's focused on trying to get the action tossed on constitutionality instead of on whether he's guilty or not.  Maybe his actual case isn't in his favor.

Actually, he doesn't want to do what you suggest.  Perhaps you should research things.

662149cf-7b47-452c-8b1a-3a5fccc211eb-AP_MZTHUEES5YI6TFLKRDBJDK24HA.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

trump-faith-freedom.jpg?fit=640,369&ssl=

  • Like 1
  • Gay 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, FanBack said:

Actually, he doesn't want to do what you suggest.  Perhaps you should research things.

662149cf-7b47-452c-8b1a-3a5fccc211eb-AP_MZTHUEES5YI6TFLKRDBJDK24HA.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

trump-faith-freedom.jpg?fit=640,369&ssl=

That

  • Gay 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, FanBack said:

Actually, he doesn't want to do what you suggest.  Perhaps you should research things.

662149cf-7b47-452c-8b1a-3a5fccc211eb-AP_MZTHUEES5YI6TFLKRDBJDK24HA.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

trump-faith-freedom.jpg?fit=640,369&ssl=

was

  • Gay 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, FanBack said:

Actually, he doesn't want to do what you suggest.  Perhaps you should research things.

662149cf-7b47-452c-8b1a-3a5fccc211eb-AP_MZTHUEES5YI6TFLKRDBJDK24HA.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

trump-faith-freedom.jpg?fit=640,369&ssl=

an

  • Gay 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, FanBack said:

Actually, he doesn't want to do what you suggest.  Perhaps you should research things.

662149cf-7b47-452c-8b1a-3a5fccc211eb-AP_MZTHUEES5YI6TFLKRDBJDK24HA.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

trump-faith-freedom.jpg?fit=640,369&ssl=

AWE-

  • Gay 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, FanBack said:

Actually, he doesn't want to do what you suggest.  Perhaps you should research things.

662149cf-7b47-452c-8b1a-3a5fccc211eb-AP_MZTHUEES5YI6TFLKRDBJDK24HA.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

trump-faith-freedom.jpg?fit=640,369&ssl=

SOME

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 minutes ago, FanBack said:

Actually, he doesn't want to do what you suggest.  Perhaps you should research things.

662149cf-7b47-452c-8b1a-3a5fccc211eb-AP_MZTHUEES5YI6TFLKRDBJDK24HA.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

trump-faith-freedom.jpg?fit=640,369&ssl=

Post!!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, FanBack said:

Actually, he doesn't want to do what you suggest.  Perhaps you should research things.

662149cf-7b47-452c-8b1a-3a5fccc211eb-AP_MZTHUEES5YI6TFLKRDBJDK24HA.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

trump-faith-freedom.jpg?fit=640,369&ssl=

I'd like to thank the artistry of Andy Warhol, particularly his skill with collages, for inspiring this post.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 minutes ago, FanBack said:

Actually, he doesn't want to do what you suggest.  Perhaps you should research things.

662149cf-7b47-452c-8b1a-3a5fccc211eb-AP_MZTHUEES5YI6TFLKRDBJDK24HA.jpg

maxresdefault.jpg

trump-faith-freedom.jpg?fit=640,369&ssl=

I'd also like to say I was inspired by the musicality of Tony Iommi; particularly his skill in connecting disparate musical motifs into one cohesive whole.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

What's there to testify about? He's not in office any longer and they have no proof he incited a riot. However, plenty of proof of Democrats inciting riots in blue cities with billions worth of damage. Who should be impeached now?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, foster said:

It's in the best interest of the former president to not take the stand.  I can't see him having the self control to be able to keep from incriminating himself.  

Interesting that he's focused on trying to get the action tossed on constitutionality instead of on whether he's guilty or not.  Maybe his actual case isn't in his favor.

How could it be in his favor? Every senator, every Congress person was in the capital when it was attacked. We all watched it on live tv. The evidence is indisputable. The best he has is to find it unconstitutional but even then he loses because there's precedence where somebody who was no longer in office was convicted in an impeachment hearing. Granted he wasn't a president but there is nothing that specifies the level of office.

On top of that, he no longer has the ability to hide behind that doj opinion about indicting a sitting president. And, if he takes the fifth, well that's not going to look very good for him either.

Fortunately, almost every Republican senator is a traitor to his oath and will prove that when they vote against convicting him

  • Haha 1

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

 

Twitter: @HKTheResistance

 

HipKat, on *** other h***, is genuine, unapoli***tically nasty, and w**** his hea** on his ******. jc856

I’ll just forward them to Bridgett. comssvet11

Seek help. soflabillsfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, direbills said:

Ha ha ha. The coward chickenshit does not have the balls to testify. We all knew that. He hides behind the Proud Boys, the White Supremacists, the Oath Keepers and 3 Percenters. He is a coward just like his cult members who hide behind their guns. Just a bunch of cowards.

Why would the man testify at a sham proceeding where there's no chance he'll be convicted?  To give the MSM big ratings?  The whole thing is a complete joke and you're a big idiot.  :classic_laugh:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Thebowflexbody said:

Why would the man testify at a sham proceeding where there's no chance he'll be convicted?  To give the MSM big ratings?  The whole thing is a complete joke and you're a big idiot.  :classic_laugh:

There is no chance that the Qanon bitch was going to get stripped of her committees either, but you saw how that turned out


“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

 

Twitter: @HKTheResistance

 

HipKat, on *** other h***, is genuine, unapoli***tically nasty, and w**** his hea** on his ******. jc856

I’ll just forward them to Bridgett. comssvet11

Seek help. soflabillsfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Thebowflexbody said:

Why would the man testify at a sham proceeding where there's no chance he'll be convicted?  To give the MSM big ratings?  The whole thing is a complete joke and you're a big idiot.  :classic_laugh:

There are people who study the Constitution for a living telling us that a President who is no longer in office cannot be impeached.

If this is true, there is only one explanation for this impeachment proceeding to continue..........

They need Trump to stay in the news.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, FanBack said:

Shit take by a shit mind.

Many defendants don't testify.  Especially in criminal proceedings; although this is simply the kookiest collection of Australian marsupial jurisprudence that I have ever seen.  The first impeachment was an outright abuse of power by our legislative branch.  This is just grandstanding.

He should stand up there so myriad, Ignorant Totalitarian-socialist congressman can give long-winded speeches for their dullard constituents?  Hard pass by the Aquarian, our greatest living President.

Just to brighten up this thread:

    kjeQ=&risl=&pid=ImgRaw

GetFile.aspx?guid=8690b2d6-67eb-46ff-b7d

gettyimages-509212674.jpg?w=1500

I usually ignore you like you should ignore an unhinged rabid insane dog. 

But I will take the time to say, he LOST and is now a twice impeached POS lose. Ha ha. You can continue your unhinged drivel but the bottom-line is you supported a twice impeached Loser who lost in a landslide. LANDSLIDE and now he sits in POS club with no way to communicate. Take about pathetic. So there is that.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...