Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  
SackMan518

5 More Ways Joe Biden Magically Outperformed Election Norms

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, 212frawk said:

MAGAT tears, they never get old!

Perhaps, but the team Biden is putting together is god awful.  Awful.  Are you saying they're great and what you like??????????

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
18 minutes ago, Thebowflexbody said:

Perhaps, but the team Biden is putting together is god awful.  Awful.  Are you saying they're great and what you like??????????

I'm saying they are not a) billionaires (devos, ross b) grifters (kush,) c) tv personalities (Kudlow the blow freak, Bolton) d) internet trolls (grenell) e) blood relatives (Iskanka).  

I'll take that.  

So Jethro, now that its finally sinking in that fatass is a goner, why not start focusing on putting a real R in the WH in '24, mKay?

  • Thanks 1

lol

 

ECQKgbmW4AAkI5n.jpg:large

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
42 minutes ago, 212frawk said:

MAGAT tears, they never get old!

Like I said, the worst.  Hey, sucks for you as well as me.  I have a feeling you already know this, though.  Retread-City.  Ugh.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Professor Pigworth said:

So there's been this massive, widespread, easily proven election conspiracy committed by unscrupulous Democrats in all the swing states in the presidential race but somehow not in the senate and congressional races.

And to date this massive, widespread, easily proven election conspiracy hasn't gotten the slightest traction in court. In some cases they've literally been laughed out of court, in fact.

Does this mean that the conspiracy extends to all the courts as well? 

Donald cultists, did you actually try thinking this through before swallowing the latest radical conspiracy theory hook, line and sinker?

See these posts show that while you are passable at satire your intellectual capacity and information processing ability are feeble at best. You haven't figured out that when people vote no one just checks the President and leaves all of the downstream ballots unmarked even if they don't personally know the candidates people vote down the party line for D or R. So to see the smaller candidates winning big and the President not benefiting from the residual of that is highly suspicious at a minimum and defies norms going all the way back to the 2 party system. Of course, being a limey you may not be familiar with how the American election process works but we'll forgive you for that even though your best quality is being the Range's two-bit version of John Oliver.

Second, you talk about the courts not even knowing that many of them are part of the Democratic machine who are in on it. Why wouldn't they cover for the Harris-Biden team? Example, in the recent Trump vs. Boockvar Pennsylvania lawsuit which was denied it was presided over by Judge Matthew W. Brann (a 2012 Obama appointee). If the same situation happened in a Red state and it went before the courts you would see similar results. Don't believe me? Reference Bush v Gore in 2000.

So in the future figure out if you want to debate with the big boys are be a parody account because you're not succeeding at either one.

  • Like 2

Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, 212frawk said:

I'm saying they are not a) billionaires (devos, ross b) grifters (kush,) c) tv personalities (Kudlow the blow freak, Bolton) d) internet trolls (grenell) e) blood relatives (Iskanka).  

I'll take that.  

So Jethro, now that its finally sinking in that fatass is a goner, why not start focusing on putting a real R in the WH in '24, mKay?

I'm not sure there are any real Republicans anymore

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Thebowflexbody said:

As if we've heard the last of Donald J. Trump!  LOL.  More to come.  Don't worry.  :classic_biggrin:

I'm not a Trumpster, just cant stand Biden (or Democrats) and I hate the lesser of two evils. if there is another election, I think I will only vote local.

We deserve much better.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, jamsim67 said:

I'm not sure there are any real Republicans anymore

not many after trump.  but that's what you get when districts are gerrymandered to crush a primary candidate to dust with 10% of the vote. 


lol

 

ECQKgbmW4AAkI5n.jpg:large

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, 212frawk said:

I'm saying they are not a) billionaires (devos, ross b) grifters (kush,) c) tv personalities (Kudlow the blow freak, Bolton) d) internet trolls (grenell) e) blood relatives (Iskanka).  

I'll take that.  

So Jethro, now that its finally sinking in that fatass is a goner, why not start focusing on putting a real R in the WH in '24, mKay?

LOL.  Biden dream team?  More like the shit team.  Right now I like Josh Hawley, but that could change.  I doubt Trump is going to want to run when he's up there in Biden's current age bracket in 2024.  I like Tom Cotton and Ron DeSantis too.  Already looking good for the Repubs in 2024.  I, of course, am an Independent who always votes Republican because I HAVE NO OTHER CHOICE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, 212frawk said:

not many after trump.  but that's what you get when districts are gerrymandered to crush a primary candidate to dust with 10% of the vote. 

The one who sounded the most like a Republican, was a Democrat, Tulsi Gabbards. I actually liked her

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

image.thumb.png.633bfc7e267dce76c34d00b94e0de97a.png
 

 

image.png


“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

 

Twitter: @HKTheResistance

 

HipKat, on *** other h***, is genuine, unapoli***tically nasty, and w**** his hea** on his ******. jc856

I’ll just forward them to Bridgett. comssvet11

Seek help. soflabillsfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well researched and you can read the entire report at the link. You won't find this on MSM sites.

Anomalies in Vote Counts and Their Effects on Election 2020

A Quantitative Analysis of Decisive Vote Updates in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia on and after Election Night

 

Executive Summary
In the early hours of November 4th, 2020, Democratic candidate Joe Biden received several major “vote spikes” that substantially — and decisively — improved his electoral position in Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia. Much skepticism and uncertainty surrounds these “vote spikes.” Critics point to suspicious vote counting practices, extreme differences between the two major candidates’ vote counts, and the timing of the vote updates, among other factors, to cast doubt on the legitimacy of some of these spikes. While data analysis cannot on its own demonstrate fraud or systemic issues, it can point us to statistically anomalous cases that invite further scrutiny. 

This is one such case: Our analysis finds that a few key vote updates in competitive states were unusually large in size and had an unusually high Biden-to-Trump ratio. We demonstrate the results differ enough from expected results to be cause for concern.
With this report, we rely only on publicly available data from the New York Times to identify and analyze statistical anomalies in key states. Looking at 8,954 individual vote updates (differences in vote totals for each candidate between successive changes to the running vote totals, colloquially also referred to as “dumps” or “batches”), we discover a remarkably consistent mathematical property: there is a clear inverse relationship between difference in candidates’ vote counts and and the ratio of the vote counts. (In other words, it's not surprising to see vote updates with large margins, and it's not surprising to see vote updates with very large ratios of support between the candidates, but it is surprising to see vote updates which are both). 

The significance of this property will be further explained in later sections of this report. Nearly every vote update, across states of all sizes and political leanings follow this statistical pattern. A very small number, however, are especially aberrant. Of the seven vote updates which follow the pattern the least, four individual vote updates — two in Michigan, one in Wisconsin, and one in Georgia — were particularly anomalous and influential  with respect to this property and all occurred within the same five hour window.

In particular, we are able to quantify the extent of compliance with this property and discover that, of the 8,954 vote updates used in the analysis, these four decisive updates were the 1st, 2nd, 4th, and 7th most anomalous updates in the entire data set. Not only does each of these vote updates not follow the generally observed pattern, but the anomalous behavior of these updates is particularly extreme. That is, these vote updates are outliers of the outliers.

The four vote updates in question are: 

  1. An update in Michigan listed as of 6:31AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 141,258 votes for Joe Biden and 5,968 votes for Donald Trump
  2. An update in Wisconsin listed as 3:42AM Central Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 143,379 votes for Joe Biden and 25,163 votes for Donald Trump
  3. A vote update in Georgia listed at 1:34AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 136,155 votes for Joe Biden and 29,115 votes for Donald Trump
  4. An update in Michigan listed as of 3:50AM Eastern Time on November 4th, 2020, which shows 54,497 votes for Joe Biden and 4,718 votes for Donald Trump

This report predicts what these vote updates would have looked like, had they followed the same pattern as the vast majority of the 8,950 others. We find that the extents of the respective anomalies here are more than the margin of victory in all three states — Michigan, Wisconsin, and Georgia — which collectively represent forty-two electoral votes.

Extensive mathematical detail is provided and the data and the code (for the data-curation, data transformation, plotting, and modeling) are all attached in the appendix to this document[1].

3a980650-648e-4a47-b7f5-46402740a24b_888

 

  • Like 1

Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For those who missed the Pennsylvania conference today on election fraud, here is a list of facts that was presented at the 3.5 hour conference from witness testimony:

 

  • 680,000 votes were counted without ANY observers whatsoever

  • Republican observers were barred despite having observer certificates because their certificates were marked orange (Dem certificates are light blue)

  • Observers were only allowed after a Federal judge ordered it

  • They were only allowed to observe from 6-20 feet away and the counters flashed the ballots for only 1 second

  • PA judge falsely claimed that being present in the election center was the same as observing

  • 1.8 million ballots were sent out on the state before the election and 2.5 million mail-in ballots were cast

  • Despite higher GOP voter registration in certain counties (ex. 12 thousand new Amish registrations in a county), and downsizing of Democrat registrations in said counties, Biden still outperformed Hilary even though more Dems registered to vote in 2016 than now

  • More non-downballot presidential votes were cast via mail-in ballots when it should have been the opposite (i.e. if you're in a rush on election day you only fill out president, but you don't do that when you have time at home) which means the opposite should have happened

  • Dems were allowed to "cure" ballots which is illegal

  • The legislature of Pennsylvania has the power to overturn the election and call in a second election

 

  • Like 2
  • Barf 1

Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SackMan518 said:

For those who missed the Pennsylvania conference today on election fraud, here is a list of facts that was presented at the 3.5 hour conference from witness testimony:

  • 680,000 votes were counted without ANY observers whatsoever

  • Republican observers were barred despite having observer certificates because their certificates were marked orange (Dem certificates are light blue)

  • Observers were only allowed after a Federal judge ordered it

  • They were only allowed to observe from 6-20 feet away and the counters flashed the ballots for only 1 second

  • PA judge falsely claimed that being present in the election center was the same as observing

  • 1.8 million ballots were sent out on the state before the election and 2.5 million mail-in ballots were cast

  • Despite higher GOP voter registration in certain counties (ex. 12 thousand new Amish registrations in a county), and downsizing of Democrat registrations in said counties, Biden still outperformed Hilary even though more Dems registered to vote in 2016 than now

  • More non-downballot presidential votes were cast via mail-in ballots when it should have been the opposite (i.e. if you're in a rush on election day you only fill out president, but you don't do that when you have time at home) which means the opposite should have happened

  • Dems were allowed to "cure" ballots which is illegal

  • The legislature of Pennsylvania has the power to overturn the election and call in a second election

Damning stuff.  Hope the light of day leads to something positive.  Our election system is in the SHITTER.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 11/24/2020 at 5:46 PM, jamsim67 said:

I'm not sure there are any real Republicans anymore

all thats left is an evil spawn that has no moral voice and is easily manipulated

cult of personality, with special emphasis on the word cult. youve been ensnared, True Believers. you need to follow the program and get to some TA meetings

  • Gay 1

One set of rules for all in the beloved community

"The word racism is like ketchup. It can be put on practically anything, and demanding evidence makes you a 'racist' " - Thomas Sowell

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Meathead said:

all thats left is an evil spawn that has no moral voice and is easily manipulated

cult of personality, with special emphasis on the word cult. youve been ensnared, True Believers. you need to follow the program and get to some TA meetings

LOL.  Wow.  Really, Meat?  Send up a flare when you get a clue.  Can't accuse you of making generalizations.  Eye roll.  And I'm an Independent, by the way.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, JoeFerguson said:

How can a president nominee win the election if no one, not one, showed up at his rallies? How is that even possible??

Answer: in reality, it's not possible.  The electorate is being forced to swallow a load of crap.  We cannot have another Presidential elcetion as fucked up and crooked as 2020.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, JoeFerguson said:

How can a president nominee win the election if no one, not one, showed up at his rallies? How is that even possible??

words cannot describe how stupid MAGATs are.  beyond parody.


lol

 

ECQKgbmW4AAkI5n.jpg:large

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
11 hours ago, Meathead said:

all thats left is an evil spawn that has no moral voice and is easily manipulated

cult of personality, with special emphasis on the word cult. youve been ensnared, True Believers. you need to follow the program and get to some TA meetings

The man who you claim to have immense respect for believes Dems are exactly what you claim Trump supporters are.

When will you wake up?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 minutes ago, Philly'sFinest said:

Also notice that nobody wants to respond to the actual evidence presented, but instead they choose weak attack lines and ignorance.

Just another example of how some here couldn't care less about the integrity of our election process, and likely many of our liberties and freedoms as well given the stance on this particular matter.

How anyone could ever take any one of these clowns posts as anything but utter stupidity or trolling is beyond me.

Talk about amateur hour

let us know when one of these conspiracy theories holds up in court.  


lol

 

ECQKgbmW4AAkI5n.jpg:large

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, Thebowflexbody said:

Reasonable dems have no future in their own party.  Just ask Jim Webb who was basically told not to run for President.  Dems don't even want moderates anymore.  Fine by me.  Hurts them.

Tulsi Gabbard too who got immediately attacked by the Clinton machine.


Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...