Jump to content

Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, FanBack said:

Oh, the cute little totalitarian socialists think they have a winning thread.

That is so sweet.

Listen, Low-Grade Mentality Nancy Boys, prove your assertion.  Do it.  Do it now!!  Or go sit in the corner.  Take your swings.  Them I'm coming and I'm leading with my prodigious brain.  

I love it. FanBack lives in a world where the accuser accuses and the accused is presumed innocent.

But FanBack (and his buds) level accusations of Obamagate (oh so clever) against a former president but refuses to say what they are.  And then he expects the accused's defenders to "prove your assertion...or go sit in the corner."

Prove what assertion?

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, Kelly's Heroes said:

I love it. FanBack lives in a world where the accuser accuses and the accused is presumed innocent.

But FanBack (and his buds) level accusations of Obamagate (oh so clever) against a former president but refuses to say what they are.  And then he expects the accused's defenders to "prove your assertion...or go sit in the corner."

Prove what assertion?

Youre giving them way more credit than they deserve.  SQUIRREL! lol

 

May 18, 2020 at 3:01 p.m. EDT

Attorney General William P. Barr said Monday that he did not expect the prosecutor he handpicked to review the 2016 FBI investigation into President Trump’s campaign would investigate former president Barack Obama or former vice president Joe Biden — an assertion likely to dismay Trump and his conservative allies.

 

 


lol

 

ECQKgbmW4AAkI5n.jpg:large

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, HipKat said:

HAHAHA!! You're so brainwashed. It's just naive to talk about Obama's presidency being "full of corruption" when we have this buffoon in office that truly HAS had a presidency full of non-stop corruption. I mean seriously. Stop pretending you're talking to an empty room

Huh, weird because all of the examples of corruption you guys managed to come up with over 3 years have either been blatant lies or highly exaggerated and very loose with the facts. For God's sake some of you are still whipping out that Charlottesville quote that's only been debunked 1,000 times. Meanwhile all of the stuff Obama has been accused of us has been backed up by a paper trail. Perhaps in the future you should strive more to be a citizen journalist rather than an MSM parrot? Trust me, you'll better about yourself.

  • Thanks 1

Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
28 minutes ago, Kelly's Heroes said:

I love it. FanBack lives in a world where the accuser accuses and the accused is presumed innocent.

But FanBack (and his buds) level accusations of Obamagate (oh so clever) against a former president but refuses to say what they are.  And then he expects the accused's defenders to "prove your assertion...or go sit in the corner."

Prove what assertion?

Huh, you still haven't figured out what ObaMAGAte is all all about yet? It's quite simply Watergate on steroids and one of the biggest political scandals in US history where the Intelligence Community and their willing assets were misused to spy upon a political opponent who was an American citizen at the time and then sicced on any Trump associates to jail them on plumped up process crimes. This isn't a Right Wing conspiracy, new documents are declassified each week that prove what real journalists have been talking about since Trump was sworn in. It's not our fault that you haven't been paying attention or just listening to mouthpieces telling you that...

Naked Gun Panic GIF


Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 minutes ago, SackMan518 said:

Huh, you still haven't figured out what ObaMAGAte is all all about yet? It's quite simply Watergate on steroids and one of the biggest political scandals in US history where the Intelligence Community and their willing assets were misused to spy upon a political opponent who was an American citizen at the time and then sicced on any Trump associates to jail them on plumped up process crimes. This isn't a Right Wing conspiracy, new documents are declassified each week that prove what real journalists have been talking about since Trump was sworn in. It's not our fault that you haven't been paying attention or just listening to mouthpieces telling you that...

Naked Gun Panic GIF

The president of the United States has a RESPONSIBILITY to investigate accusations that the nominee for president of a major political party conspired with a political enemy. The problem with your sweet little theory is that Obama did nothing to use any information or the fact that there was even an investigation to DAMAGE the nominee politically (in fact, the Comey headline re Hillary was in all the newspapers leading up to the election).

Lying under oath may be what you call a "process" crime, but in my book, it's just called a crime. And it's obstruction of justice in most cases. General Flynn lied about contacts with Russian leaders prior to the inauguration where Flynn, a private citizen, was telling Russia that the U.S. will relieve sanctions against Russia when Trump comes into office. He LIED. No way around it. So if that is not material, but Bill Clinton lying about sex with an intern is....

But I guess to Republicans these days, lying under oath to the FBI about illegal contacts with a foreign adversary is A-OKAY!

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Kelly's Heroes said:

The president of the United States has a RESPONSIBILITY to investigate accusations that the nominee for president of a major political party conspired with a political enemy. The problem with your sweet little theory is that Obama did nothing to use any information or the fact that there was even an investigation to DAMAGE the nominee politically (in fact, the Comey headline re Hillary was in all the newspapers leading up to the election).

Yeah, uh, get with the news... it's no longer a "theory." It's fact now the depth of which we don't even know yet. And hey, it's not legal to investigate a political candidate on the basis of a fictional document known as the Steele Dossier or Pee-Pee Tape which was paid for by the Democrat opposition. Maybe if you looked at the footnotes on that you'd realize that the named sources did not corroborate what was in that document which means they knew the whole thing was a pile of shit all along making it laughable in any sane FISA court that authorizes such surveillance powers.

While I agree with your initial statement that was not the case here and all the big players knew it.


Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, SackMan518 said:

Yeah, uh, get with the news... it's no longer a "theory." It's fact now the depth of which we don't even know yet. And hey, it's not legal to investigate a political candidate on the basis of a fictional document known as the Steele Dossier or Pee-Pee Tape which was paid for by the Democrat opposition. Maybe if you looked at the footnotes on that you'd realize that the named sources did not corroborate what was in that document which means they knew the whole thing was a pile of shit all along making it laughable in any sane FISA court that authorizes such surveillance powers.

While I agree with your initial statement that was not the case here and all the big players knew it.

Oh the Steele Dossier? You mean the one  that was written at the behest of Fusion GPS? Which had been hired in October 2015, Fusion GPS by the conservative political website The Washington Free Beacon to provide general opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates.

P.S. It does have Trump pee-pee tapes! Prove me wrong.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 5/14/2020 at 11:55 AM, Kelly's Heroes said:

You know you (Trumpers) are defending the most corrupt presidency we've ever seen. And trying to trash the least corrupt.

Sorry, Kelly's Heroes (I suspect that isn't your real name) for not being clear.

This is the assertion to which I was referring.  Least corrupt?

And this is where totalitarian socialists often make fools of themselves.  The overstating of their case to ludicrousness. 

Remember when the corrupt press called Hillary Clinton the 'most qualified person to ever run for the Presidency'.  Are you kidding me?  Better than Jefferson?  Lincoln?  Adams?

Of course when Trump beat her in a rigged (for her) election, everyone back-pedaled and said, 'she was a despicable candidate'.

So, how does this happen?  Firstly most totalitarian socialists have a surface superiority complex coupled with an inner inferiority complex.  They also overestimate their intelligence compared to the general population.  Then, they stir those ingredients in the echo chamber of their choice - Academia, Bloated Government Office, Network Newsroom, 12-step Recovery Program, etc.  From that they craft narratives that only the predisposed believers can buy.   

  • Thanks 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Why isn't Barr filing charges on Obama or anyone involved. I mean for such an open and shut case, this seems a little odd.


81Yi-LuxR2L._SY355_.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Kelly's Heroes said:

Oh the Steele Dossier? You mean the one  that was written at the behest of Fusion GPS? Which had been hired in October 2015, Fusion GPS by the conservative political website The Washington Free Beacon to provide general opposition research on Trump and other Republican presidential candidates.

P.S. It does have Trump pee-pee tapes! Prove me wrong.

Did you say you were a lawyer because you seem totally unfamiliar with how some aspects of investigations work like ECs, 302s, and Woods files. Also, as a skilled debater you would also know that the onus of proof is on the person who asserts something exists and not the person who doubts it. From page 187 of the December 2019 DOJ IG report on the FISA applications regarding the Pee-Pee/Russian prostitute allegations:

The Primary Sub-source was questioned again by the FBI beginning in March 2017 about the election reporting and his/her communications with Steele. The Washington Field Office agent (WFO Agent 1) who conducted that interview and others after it told the OIG that the Primary Sub-source felt that the tenor of Steele's reports was far more "conclusive" than was justified. The Primary Subsource also stated that he/she never expected Steele to put the Primary Subsource's statements in reports or present them as facts. According to WFO Agent 1, the Primary Sub-source said he/she made it clear to Steele that he/she had no proof to support the statements from his/her sub-sources and that "it was just talk." WFO Agent 1 said that the Primary Sub-source explained that his/her information came from "word of mouth and hearsay;" "conversation that [he/she] had with friends over beers;" and that some of the information, such as allegations about Trump's sexual activities, were statements he/she heard made in "jest. "341 The Primary Sub-source also told WFO Agent 1 that he/she believed that the other sub-sources exaggerated their access to information and the relevance of that information to his/her requests. The Primary Sub-source told WFO Agent 1 that he/she "takes what [sub-sources] tell [him/her] with 'a grain of salt."'

Here's a new development, remember when they said that Trump's transcript with the President of Ukraine was not authentic and edited to delete his alleged "quid pro quo" deal with investigating Biden and Adam Schiff went up and read a fictional version of it, mafia style, in front of Congress? And then it turned out that it actually was a true transcript of the call? Well, it looks like they were setting up to distract from Biden who just got nailed on that exact situation. There was a transcript of a call between Biden and Poroshenko with no mention of his desire to have Shokin fired for "corruption" and now audio has emerged that this was discussed, omitted from transcript, and it happened days before Shokin officially got the axe.

Would you like to back off now or should I own you a little more?

  • Thanks 2

Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
16 minutes ago, f8ta1ity54 said:

Why isn't Barr filing charges on Obama or anyone involved. I mean for such an open and shut case, this seems a little odd.

You must have missed his recent interview where he said that's not going to happen and let's be real here, politicians are rarely charged with these sorts of things and there are enough loopholes in the law to write it off merely as abuse of power and not anything to do with criminality. No President has ever served jail time. Even in my wildest dreams I know that Obama and Biden will never see a cell but it's very possible that their lackeys like Comey, Brennan, McCabe, Strozok, Page, Clapper, and others may do some time.

Plus there's the dual justice system here where Republicans serve hard time for process crimes while Democrats commit major ones that mysteriously are declined to prosecute.


Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

You must have missed his recent interview where he said that's not going to happen and let's be real here, politicians are rarely charged with these sorts of things and there are enough loopholes in the law to write it off merely as abuse of power and not anything to do with criminality. No President has ever served jail time. Even in my wildest dreams I know that Obama and Biden will never see a cell but it's very possible that their lackeys like Comey, Brennan, McCabe, Strozok, Page, Clapper, and others may do some time.

Plus there's the dual justice system here where Republicans serve hard time for process crimes while Democrats commit major ones that mysteriously are declined to prosecute.

So, Obamagate was over before it ever started. Interesting.

It would almost seem as though obamagate was a distraction from a botched covid response, and his goons gobbled it up because he knows they will. Just trying to get one less news cycle of covid.

Now what? 

Just when I thought trump had this in the bag, this election is wide open again. At least until the debates.

  • Thanks 1

81Yi-LuxR2L._SY355_.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

Huh, weird because all of the examples of corruption you guys managed to come up with over 3 years have either been blatant lies or highly exaggerated and very loose with the facts. For God's sake some of you are still whipping out that Charlottesville quote that's only been debunked 1,000 times. Meanwhile all of the stuff Obama has been accused of us has been backed up by a paper trail. Perhaps in the future you should strive more to be a citizen journalist rather than an MSM parrot? Trust me, you'll better about yourself.

The only people who debunked Charlottesville were entities that support Trump. Since then, he's shown much more of an attitude that matches what he was accused of ion Charlottesville than not.

What are you going to deny next, that he didn't ask about using disinfectant to treat CV? 

  • Disagree 1
  • Trump 1

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

 

Twitter: @HKTheResistance

 

HipKat, on *** other h***, is genuine, unapoli***tically nasty, and w**** his hea** on his ******. jc856

I’ll just forward them to Bridgett. comssvet11

Seek help. soflabillsfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, SackMan518 said:

Huh, you still haven't figured out what ObaMAGAte is all all about yet? It's quite simply Watergate on steroids and one of the biggest political scandals in US history where the Intelligence Community and their willing assets were misused to spy upon a political opponent who was an American citizen at the time and then sicced on any Trump associates to jail them on plumped up process crimes. This isn't a Right Wing conspiracy, new documents are declassified each week that prove what real journalists have been talking about since Trump was sworn in. It's not our fault that you haven't been paying attention or just listening to mouthpieces telling you that...

 

An American citizen that was running for President and was already being accused of accepting favors from Russia - which actually warrants an investigation. 

  • Disagree 1
  • Trump 1

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

 

Twitter: @HKTheResistance

 

HipKat, on *** other h***, is genuine, unapoli***tically nasty, and w**** his hea** on his ******. jc856

I’ll just forward them to Bridgett. comssvet11

Seek help. soflabillsfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, f8ta1ity54 said:

So, Obamagate was over before it ever started. Interesting.

It would almost seem as though obamagate was a distraction from a botched covid response, and his goons gobbled it up because he knows they will. Just trying to get one less news cycle of covid.

Now what? 

Just when I thought trump had this in the bag, this election is wide open again. At least until the debates.

Far from it, as I said this will be a big issue for the Intelligence Community henchmen who will take the fall and this has been ongoing for 3 years... it is not a recent development.


Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, HipKat said:

An American citizen that was running for President and was already being accused of accepting favors from Russia - which actually warrants an investigation. 

You're clearly not familiar with the Woods Procedures. Are you saying that only an accusal is needed with zero evidence? That's what happened. You must be a real patriot to love those totalitarian powers.

In other news, a new whistleblower has emerged!

The Treasury Department Spied on Flynn, Manafort, and the Trump Family, Says Whistleblower

 

President Barack Obama’s Treasury Department regularly surveilled retired Army Lt. Gen. Michael T. Flynn’s financial records and transactions beginning in December 2015 and well into 2017, before, during and after when he served at the White House as President Donald Trump’s National Security Director, a former senior Treasury Department official, and veteran of the intelligence community, told the Star Newspapers.

“I started seeing things that were not correct, so I did my own little investigation, because I wanted to make sure what I was seeing was correct” she said. “You never want to draw attention to something if there is not anything there.”

The whistleblower said she only saw metadata, that is names and dates when the general’s financial records were accessed. “I never saw what they saw.”

By March 2016, the whistleblower said she and a colleague, who was detailed to Treasury from the intelligence community, became convinced that the surveillance of Flynn was not tied to legitimate criminal or national security concerns, but was straight-up political surveillance among other illegal activity occurring at Treasury.

“When I showed it to her, what she said, ‘Oh, sh%t!’ and I knew right then and there that I was right – this was some shady stuff,” the whistleblower said.

“It wasn’t just him,” the whistleblower said. “They were targeting other U.S. citizens, as well.”

Only two names are listed in the whistleblower’s official paperwork, so the others must remain sealed, she said. The second name is Paul J. Manafort Jr., the one-time chairman of Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

The other names include: Members of Congress, the most senior staffers on the 2016 Trump campaign and members of Trump’s family, she said.

“Another thing they would do is take targeted names from a certain database – I cannot name, but you can guess – and they were going over to an unclassified database and they were running those names in the unclassified database,” she said.

This ruse was to get around using classified resources to surveil Americans, she said. Once the Treasury personnel had enough information about someone they were targeting from the black box, they would go to the white box for faster and more informed search.

It was routine for these searches that had no criminal nor national security predicate, merely a political predicate, she said.

Complaint filed with Treasury Inspector General

In March 2017, she filed a formal whistleblower complaint with Acting Treasury Inspector General Richard K. Delmar, who continues in that office today, she said. Beyond Delmar acknowledging receipt of the complaint, the inspector general never followed up on the matter.

This formal complaint was a follow-up to an August 2016 notification to Delmar that did not meet the full requirements of formal complaint, but it provided Delmar with the details of Treasury’s surveillance of Flynn, she said.

The whistleblower filed a subsequent complaint with the Office of Special Counsel May 2017, which is the permanent office established to work with whistleblowers and is not related to Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

This surveillance program was run out of Treasury’s Office of Intelligence Analysis, which was then under the leadership of S. Leslie Ireland. Ireland came to OIA in 2010 after a long tenure at the Central Intelligence Agency and a one-year stint as Obama’s daily in-person intelligence briefer.

The whistleblower said Treasury should never have been part of the unmasking of Flynn, because its surveillance operation was off-the-books. That is to say, the Justice Department never gave the required approval to the Treasury program, and so there were no guidelines, approvals nor reports that would be associated with a DOJ-sanctioned domestic surveillance operation.

“Accessing this information without approved and signed attorney general guidelines would violate U.S. persons constitutional rights and civil liberties,” she said.

“IC agencies have to adhere to Executive Order 12333, or as it is known in the community: E.O. 12-Triple-Three. Just because OIA does not have signed guidelines does not give them the power or right to operate as they want, if you want information on a U.S. person then work with the FBI on a Title III, if it is a U.S. person involved with a foreign entity then follow the correct process for a FISA, but without signed AG guidelines you cannot even get started,” she said. Title III refers to the FBI authority to electronically surveil Americans.

Top Obama Treasury officials among those who unmasked Flynn

Because the intercepts from Flynn’s Dec. 29, 2016 phone call with the Russian ambassador Sergei were captured by an entity other than Treasury, Patrick Conlon, the OIA director, who succeeded Ireland, was on the list of 37 Obama administration officials who either requested that Flynn’s name be unmasked or were shown the unmasked surveillance product.

Conlon accessed the Flynn file Dec. 14, 2016.

There must have been some kind of meeting that day. These are all of the other Treasury Department officials looking at Flynn that day: Secretary Jacob Lew, Acting Assistant Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis A. Daniel “Danny” McGlynn, Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary for Intelligence and Analysis Michael Neufeld, Deputy Secretary Sarah Raskin, Under Secretary Nathan Sheets and Acting Under Secretary Adam Szubin.

Lew is the only one who made the list again, this time Jan. 12, 2017 – and if his deputy’s name sounds familiar, Raskin is the wife of Rep. Jamin B. “Jamie” Raskin (D.-Md.), one of the House Prosecutors, who argued for the removal of Trump after his impeachment. The congressman’s wife was also an Obama-appointed Federal Reserve governor.

 

  • Thanks 1

Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, f8ta1ity54 said:

So, Obamagate was over before it ever started. Interesting.

It would almost seem as though obamagate was a distraction from a botched covid response, and his goons gobbled it up because he knows they will. Just trying to get one less news cycle of covid.

Now what? 

Just when I thought trump had this in the bag, this election is wide open again. At least until the debates.

I think you'd better worry about my post above; it applies to you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

But yet, we now know that Flynn was indeed engaged in nefarious activities with Russia.  And how do  we know? Because he admitted it!

  • Disagree 1

“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

 

Twitter: @HKTheResistance

 

HipKat, on *** other h***, is genuine, unapoli***tically nasty, and w**** his hea** on his ******. jc856

I’ll just forward them to Bridgett. comssvet11

Seek help. soflabillsfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 minutes ago, FanBack said:

I think you'd better worry about my post above; it applies to you.

Holy projection, batman!


81Yi-LuxR2L._SY355_.jpg

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
29 minutes ago, HipKat said:

But yet, we now know that Flynn was indeed engaged in nefarious activities with Russia.  And how do  we know? Because he admitted it!

Blatant lie, show us your source on that and don't say you heard it on the radio because that won't fly this time.


Sack "The Buffalo Range's TRUSTED News Source!"

“When a well-packaged web of lies has been sold gradually to the masses over generations, the truth will seem utterly preposterous and its speaker a raving lunatic.” ~ Dresden James

Parler @NYexile

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, SackMan518 said:

Blatant lie, show us your source on that and don't say you heard it on the radio because that won't fly this time.

But it's sirius, which means it's different than mainstream!  ;)


"I don't think I'm easy to talk about. I've got a very irregular head. And I'm not anything that you think I am anyway".

-Syd Barrett, founder of Pink Floyd. Rolling Stone, December 1971

 

https://oathkeepers.org/about/

 

Europa: The last Battle is possibly the most useful documentary in existence in terms of understanding how society came to be like it currently is: https://search.bitchute.com/renderer?use=bitchute-json&name=Search&login=bcadmin&key=7ea2d72b62aa4f762cc5a348ef6642b8&query=Europa+The+Last+Battle

 

https://nativeamericanchurches.org/

 

My Adopt A Bill is Stefon Diggs

My 2nd Adopt A Bill is Christian Wade(he gets an exemption and doesn't require a spot) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Thing about Sack that disturbs me the most is that usually I figure people are just ignorant and support Trump and I actually get it... No time to pay attention to politics IDK whatever... Sack is willingly ignorant which is so much worse.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, SackMan518 said:

Blatant lie, show us your source on that and don't say you heard it on the radio because that won't fly this time.

Did you already forget that controversy with AG Barr dropping the charges on him?  You know, it's hard to have a debate with someone who willingly ignores details that work against his support of the most corrupt President in modern history. Seriously, stop looking for any obscurity you can find to back your argument up and try taking the obvious things at face value. 


“There he goes. One of God's own prototypes.

A high-powered mutant of some kind, never even considered for mass production.

Too weird to live, and too rare to die.”

 

Twitter: @HKTheResistance

 

HipKat, on *** other h***, is genuine, unapoli***tically nasty, and w**** his hea** on his ******. jc856

I’ll just forward them to Bridgett. comssvet11

Seek help. soflabillsfan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

A person generally does not write a cover your butt letter out of boredom.  This could be interesting.

 

 

BREAKING: Susan Rice Letter To Self Declassified, Pg One Released (Embedded) DOJ Reviewing Rest

Seemed To Cover Obama Administration About General Flynn

by Jeff Dunetz | May 19, 2020 | Crime/Corruption

Susan Rice letter declassified
  •  

Thanks to a request by Sen. Ron Johnson (R-WI) and action by acting DNI Rick Grenell the full infamous Susan Rice letter was declassified. Written in January 2017 as President Trump was being inaugurated, the letter served the purposes of covering her arse about Russiagate, the first page has been released (embedded below) and the DOJ is reviewing the rest and it should be released soon.

On January 5th, 2017  President Barack Obama and VP Biden met with, FBI Director James Comey,  Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, CIA Director John Brennan, Director of National Intelligence James Clapper and Susan Rice regarding Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election.  According to the documents that were part of the DOJ brief about dropping the Michael Flynn charges, at this meeting Sally Yates “learned of the information about Flynn” and his conversation with Russia’s ambassador about sanctions. Not mentioned in the document was Susan Rice’s CYA (cover her ass) memo to herself about that meeting, literally written as Donald Trump was being sworn in as President.

Fifteen minutes after Donald Trump was sworn in as the 45th President of the United States Susan Rice, who had just become the former National Security Adviser sent out her last email using her official White House email account.  It was a strange email, about a meeting fifteen days before. The meeting was about Russian interference in the 2016 Presidential election. And according to Sen.Grassley (R-IA) included a discussion of the Steele Dossier.

Trending: Pelosi Knew About COVID-19 During Impeachment Trial-Then Why Didn’t She Act? (Video)

The purpose of the email seemed to be to get on the record that the Obama administration did nothing wrong in the Russian investigation. She noted repeatedly how Obama emphasized during the meeting on Russian that he wanted every aspect of the issue handled “by the book.”

take our poll - story continues below
  • Why wait until November 3? Show all of America who you're voting for in 2020  

Prior to today, only part of one page of the letter was released to the public. Now the full page one has been released and the DOJ is looking at the rest before it is sent back to Congress for release. Below is page one and this post will be updated once the rest is approved by DOJ for full release.

The letter begins with a review of who was there, then it tried to provide cover for President Obama the national security team.

“President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities ‘by the book’.  The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective.  He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.”
Looking back on the next sentence it seemed like a call for omerta.
“From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.”
The part of page one that was classified before today spoke about former FBI Director Comey and his “worries” about General Flynn:

“Director Comey affirmed that he is proceeding ‘by the book’ as it relates to law enforcement,” From a national security perspective, Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador Kislyak. Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing sensitive information. President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn. Comey replied ‘potentially.’ He added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that ‘the level of communication is unusual.’ The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said that he would.”

Frequently? Flynn had two phone calls with Kislyak, that’s not frequent or unusual. Truth is, President Obama and his national security staff had it in for the General because he spoke the truth about the administration’s weak effort in Iraq and warned about the development of ISIS.

Read the entire page one release below:

1-9ee362f414.jpg

https://lidblog.com/susan-rice-letter-declassified/

 


"I don't think I'm easy to talk about. I've got a very irregular head. And I'm not anything that you think I am anyway".

-Syd Barrett, founder of Pink Floyd. Rolling Stone, December 1971

 

https://oathkeepers.org/about/

 

Europa: The last Battle is possibly the most useful documentary in existence in terms of understanding how society came to be like it currently is: https://search.bitchute.com/renderer?use=bitchute-json&name=Search&login=bcadmin&key=7ea2d72b62aa4f762cc5a348ef6642b8&query=Europa+The+Last+Battle

 

https://nativeamericanchurches.org/

 

My Adopt A Bill is Stefon Diggs

My 2nd Adopt A Bill is Christian Wade(he gets an exemption and doesn't require a spot) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

For anyone needing a bit more context(or a refresher) to understand the significance of the last post.  Maybe now some of the wise guys can see the levee beginning to crack.  Give it a bit more time, this isn't a fast food order.

 

 

 

Declassified Susan Rice email conflicts with her statement to Congress from 2018

 

Rice needs to clear up these questions

 
Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images
 
 
 

A newly declassified email from former Obama official Susan Rice appears to conflict with the statement her lawyer gave to Congress about that email in 2018.

 

 

The email was sent by Rice to herself on the day of President Donald Trump's inauguration in order to document her notes about a meeting of Obama officials about incoming national security advisor Mike Flynn.

The newly un-redacted portion of the email involves the warning from former FBI Director James Comey that Flynn had an unusual number of interactions with a Russian ambassador.

Director Comey affirmed that he is proceeding "by the book" as it relates to law enforcement. From a national security perspective, Comey said he does have some concerns that incoming NSA Flynn is speaking frequently with Russian Ambassador Kislyak. Comey said that could be an issue as it relates to sharing sensitive information.

President Obama asked if Comey was saying that the NSC should not pass sensitive information related to Russia to Flynn. Comey replied, 'potentially.' He added that he has no indication thus far that Flynn has passed classified information to Kislyak, but he noted that the 'level of communication is unusual.'

But in a statement sent in 2018 from her attorney Kathryn Ruemmler to Congress, Rice indicated that she had no knowledge about any investigation by the FBI into Trump officials colluding with Russian officials.

While serving as National Security Advisor, Ambassador Rice was not briefed on the existence of any FBI investigation into allegations of collusion between Mr. Trump's associates and Russia, and she later learned of the fact of this investigation from Director Comey's subsequent public testimony.

The letter goes on to claim that Rice didn't know about any FISA applications made during the investigation into alleged collusion:

Ambassador Rice was not informed of any FISA applications sought by the FBI in its investigation, and she only learned of them from press reports after leaving office.

This appears to conflict with the declassified portion of her self-email that show Comey discussed the communications that the FBI had obtained between Flynn and the Russian ambassador.

 

 

Rice responds

Rice released a statement through her spokesperson Erin Pelton in response to the release of the declassified email.

The statement denies that the meeting had anything to do with an FBI investigation and decries "dishonest accusations" making such claims.

Ambassador Rice's email makes clear that no discussion of law enforcement matters or investigations took place, despite dishonest accusations to the contrary. The email clearly states that President Obama stressed that he was "not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective."

The statement goes on to ask that the Director of National Intelligence release the "unredacted transcripts of all Kislyak-Flynn calls."

Anything else?

In the wake of the release of the declassified email, a resurfaced video of Rice's claims was circulated on social media to further corroborate the claim that she had been dishonest about the unmasking of Trump officials. The video comes from an interview on PBS in March 2017.

"During the transition, after President Trump uh, had been elected, he and the people around him may have been caught up in surveillance of foreign individuals and that their identities may have been disclosed," said PBS host Judy Woodruff. "Do you know anything about this?"

"I know nothing about this," claimed Rice.

Here's the video of Rice from PBS in 2017:

 

 

https://www.theblaze.com/news/susan-rice-email-statement-conflict-fisa

 


"I don't think I'm easy to talk about. I've got a very irregular head. And I'm not anything that you think I am anyway".

-Syd Barrett, founder of Pink Floyd. Rolling Stone, December 1971

 

https://oathkeepers.org/about/

 

Europa: The last Battle is possibly the most useful documentary in existence in terms of understanding how society came to be like it currently is: https://search.bitchute.com/renderer?use=bitchute-json&name=Search&login=bcadmin&key=7ea2d72b62aa4f762cc5a348ef6642b8&query=Europa+The+Last+Battle

 

https://nativeamericanchurches.org/

 

My Adopt A Bill is Stefon Diggs

My 2nd Adopt A Bill is Christian Wade(he gets an exemption and doesn't require a spot) :)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Sign in to follow this  

×
×
  • Create New...