Jump to content

Hey Guest, welcome to the NEW Buffalo Range.

The Bills, Sabres and Politics forum are ALL COMBINED into one convenient forum now.

To see how exactly this works CLICK HERE to watch a 1 minute video on how it works.

Ps, you can drag this sticky note around, or just click the "X" to dismiss it.

LiterateStylish LiterateStylish

BrewMan

Members
  • Content Count

    829
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About BrewMan

  • Rank
    Range Member
  • Birthday 03/15/1969
  1. Pats are 7-0 and have beaten teams that have combined for 12 wins and 32 losses so far. Bills are 5-1 and have beaten teams that have combined for 6 wins and 27 losses so far. Pats have totally destroyed the same teams the Bills have played so far (aside form the Pats/Bills matchup). Bills barely beat the Jets in week 1 and were held in much closer check by Miami and the Giants than the Pats were so when you compare the same teams both the Bills and Pats have played so far, cream puff schedule or not, the Pats have played at a much higher level than the Bills and much of that has to go to the defense.
  2. Riiiiiiiiight and New England doesn't give up a 2nd round pick for a WR who is a healthy scratch and hardly plays any downs. Foster has more upside than Sanu? Only on this board looking through rose colored glasses.
  3. In another thread Jungle says Foster is better than Sanu.................just unleashed another rose colored glasses comment.
×
×
  • Create New...